Case law

Mallonee v. Fahey

122 F. Supp. 472 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 10, 1954

(Moore v. Fletcher), 7 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d 139 . There the court held that Section 1919 of Title 28 U. S. … In Noxon Chemical Products Co. v. Leckie, 3 Cir., 1930, 39 F.2d 318, 321 , certiorari’ denied, Robb v.

United States v. Peppa

13 F. Supp. 669 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 13, 1936

S. v. Lacher (1890) 134 U.S. 624 , 10 S.Ct. 625 , 33 L.Ed. 1080 ; Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co. (1904) 196 U.S. 1 , 25 S.Ct. 158 , 49 L.Ed. 363 ; Gooch v. U. S., 56 S.Ct. 395 , 80 L.Ed. 418 . … Making, forging, or counterfeiting Farm Credit Board Notes; subsequently distinctly specified altering. 12 U.S.C.A. § 1138d.

Doe

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 10, 2025

v. … .”); Vazquez v. Feeley, 12 || No. 2:25-cv-01542-RFB-EJY, 2025 WL 2676082, at *11 (D. Nev. Sept. 17, 2025) (same); 13 ||see also Rodriguez v.

Borrego Community Health Foundation v. Inland Valley Investments, LLC

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 13, 2023

Swartz v. … Sanford v.

Green Truck Sales, Inc. v. Høegh Lines

179 F. Supp. 562 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 4, 1960

With minor exceptions (not here involved) it was lifted from the vessel by a derrick barge and loaded on board lighters. The unloading occurred shortly before a scheduled strike of longshoremen. … Compare for applications of this “tackle to tackle” test prior to loading, Krawill Machinery Corp. v. Robert C. Herd & Co., 7 and Mackey v.

Sabirov

District Court, S.D. California · Jun 16, 2026

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 525 (2004). “[T]he traditional function of the writ is to secure release from illegal custody.” Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484 (1973). … See Rodriguez-Acurio v. Almodovar, 811 F. Supp. 3d 274, 320-21 & nn.19-20 (E.D.N.Y. 2025) (collecting cases); Martinez v. McAleenan, 385 F. Supp. 3d 349, 373 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Weitsman v. Levesque

District Court, S.D. California · May 5, 2025

Hartunian further 26 explains that Donald Brown and Misa Eiritz from Manatt will continue to serve as counsel 27 of record for Plaintiffs. … Lopez v. Glob. 1 || Bus. Consultants., No. 20-cv-1281-AJB (LL), 2021 WL 148064, at *1 (S.D. Cal Jan. 15, 2 || 2021) (citing Darby v. City of Torrance, 810 F. Supp. 275, 276 (C.D. Cal. 1992)).

Jing Li v. Chertoff

482 F. Supp. 2d 1172 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 2, 2007

.”); Safadi v. … Brown, 36 F.Supp.2d 922, 932 (D.N.M.1999) (“[B]y necessary implication the adjudication must occur within a reasonable time. A contrary position would permit the INS to delay indefinitely.

Settrini v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 25, 2023

United States v. … In Brown v. Grinder, Case No. 2:13- 15 cv-01007-KJM-KJN, 2019 WL 2337107 (E.D. Cal.

Alhawari v. Kijakazi

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 2, 2023

Ghanim v. Colvin, 763 F.3d 1154, 1163 (9th Cir. 2014) 15 (quoting Vasquez v. … Astrue, 572 F.3d 586, 591 (9th Cir. 2009)); see also Brown-Hunter v. 16 || Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015) (rejecting an ALJ adverse-credibility 17 ||determination when she merely listed medical

Beaver v. Tarsadia Hotels

978 F. Supp. 2d 1124 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 16, 2013

Brown v. Superior Court, 34 Cal.2d 559, 568 , 212 P.2d 878 (1949); see also Foley v. Interactive Data Corp., 47 Cal.3d 654, 683 , 254 Cal.Rptr. 211 , 765 P.2d 373 (1988) (citing Rest.2d Contracts § 205). … Co. v. Gladstone Holmes, Inc., 135 Cal.App.3d 973, 977 , 186 Cal.Rptr. 6 (1982) (contract not illusory where contract conditioned on board approval).

Clines v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 3, 2021

Com’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 23 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997) (referencing Monell, 436 U.S. at 689–92). … (quoting Board of County Commissioners v.

United States v. Telink, Inc.

681 F. Supp. 1454 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 24, 1988

See United States v. Runnels, 833 F.2d 1183, 1186 (6th Cir.1987). The following Term, however, the Supreme Court again interpreted the mail fraud statute. In Carpenter v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). Thus, a property right that exists in California may not exist in other states.

Alvernaz v. Ratelle

831 F. Supp. 790 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 9, 1993

See also Hill v. … The [parole] board may find a prisoner unsuitable for parole, however, on a variety of grounds.... In recent years the board has consistently found the vast majority of life prisoners to be unsuitable for parole.

Orthopaedic Hospital v. DJO Global, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 22, 2020

See Larson v. Harrington, 11 F. Supp. 2d 1198, 1200–01 (E.D. … P. 26(b)(5); see also Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs.

Sweeney v. Bert Bell NFL Player Retirement Plan

961 F. Supp. 1381 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 21, 1997

The Board did not attribute much weight to the doctors’ reports submitted by Plaintiff or requested by the Board. Dr. James H. … by the Board.

United States v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 17, 2025

Leite v. … See Campbell v.

Ghianni

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 24, 2026

Stanz 1 v. Brown, No. 22-CV-1164-GPC-JLB, 2025 WL 417935, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2025) 2 (citing Beard, 2008 WL 410694, at *2). “Failure to pay attorney’s fees can be a valid 3 ground for withdrawal.” … Leatt Corp. v. Innovative Safety Tech., LLC, No. 09-CV-1301- 4 IEG (POR), 2010 WL 444708, at *2 (S.D. Cal.

M&E Brothers, LLC v. The Estate of Barbara Hortman et al.

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 18, 2024

Eminence Cap., LLC v. … See Kupetz v. Wolf, 845 F.2d 842, 847 n.7 (9th Cir. 13 1988); Mejia v. Reed, 31 Cal. 4th 657, 664 (2003); Severance v.

Rogers v. United States Navy

223 F.R.D. 533 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 12, 2004

evaluate the nature and extent of Plaintiffs alleged injuries resulting from the incident, as well as the causation of such injuries and the reasonableness and necessity of Plaintiffs medical treatment, the government retained board-certified … Persuasive authority, however, is provided by the case of Behler v. Hanlon, 199 F.R.D. 553 (D.Md.2001). In Behler , the Plaintiff sought extensive private financial information regarding the defendant’s medical expert.