Case law

In Re FP Newport Corporation

137 F. Supp. 58 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 23, 1955

. § 67 , sub. c; In re Finkelstein, D.C.Pa.1925, 3 F.2d 1006 ; California State Board of Equalization *60 v. Sampsell, 9 Cir., 1952, 196 F.2d 252 . The petition for review is signed by Newport’s attorney. … Leavenworth State Bank, 9 Cir., 1950, 184 F.2d 498, 501 ]; Weil v. Neary, 1929, 278 U.S. 160, 172-174 , 49 S.Ct. 144 , 73 L.Ed. 243 ; Crutcher v. Logan, 5 Cir., 1939, 102 F.2d 612 ; Cox v.

Jenks v. Saul

District Court, S.D. California · Dec 7, 2021

Pl.’s Mot. at 10 (citing Brown-Hunter v. … Nichols 7 v. Saul, 2019 WL 6252934, at *10 (S.D. Cal., Nov. 22, 2019) (quoting Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d 8 at 495).

In Re C & P Co.

63 F. Supp. 400 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 14, 1945

See Bowman v. … Brown, District Attorney of Humboldt County, Nevada, whom they had used as their nominee to secure the Bernard lease.

Green v. Hughes Aircraft Co.

630 F. Supp. 423 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 22, 1985

Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171 , 87 S.Ct. 903 , 17 L.Ed.2d 842 (1967); Fristoe v. Reynolds Metals Co., 615 F.2d 1209, 1212 (9th Cir.1980). … Those decisions consider preemption under the National Labor Relations Board’s primary jurisdiction over unfair labor practices.

Unigard Insurance v. Department of the Treasury

997 F. Supp. 1339 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 5, 1997

McDonnell v. … See National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132 , 95 S.Ct. 1504, 1513 , 44 L.Ed.2d 29 (1975). It is also irrelevant, that ATF agents in Utah knew that Mr. Lynch represents Unigard.

Anderson

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 24, 2026

See Ladd v. County of San Mateo, 12 Cal. 4th 913, 917 (1996). “[A] 11 plaintiff must establish the defendant owed a legal duty of care.” Brown v. USA 12 Taekwondo, 11 Cal. 5th 204, 209 (2021). … Weyer v.

Wilson v. Poulos

697 F. Supp. 2d 1192 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 2, 2010

Coverdell v. … See Patterson v.

Beaver v. Tarsadia Hotels

29 F. Supp. 3d 1323 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 29, 2014

“Congress may amend a statute to establish new law, but it also may enact an amendment ‘to clarify existing law, to correct a misinterpretation, or to overrule wrongly decided cases.’ ” Brown v. … Id. at 1284 ; see also Brown, 374 F.3d at 259 .

National Battery Co. v. Western Molded Products Co.

39 F. Supp. 954 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 23, 1941

Evr-Klean Seat Pad Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 8 Cir., 118 F.2d 600 ; Hotchkiss et al. v. Greenwood, 11 How. 248 , 13 L.Ed. 683 ; Brown v. District of Columbia, 130 U.S. 87 , 9 S.Ct. 437 , 32 L.Ed. 863 . … Rubber Tip Pencil Co. v. Howard, 20 Wall. 498 , 22 L.Ed. 410 ; Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co. v. Jorgensen [2 Cir.] 290 F. 184 ; Thomas A. Edison, Inc., v. Waterbury Battery Co. [2 Cir.] 287 F. 320 ; Way v.

Pulse Electronics, Inc. v. U.D. Electronic Corp.

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 30, 2020

of claim construction as explored in Phillips 19 v. … Curtiss-Wright Flow 4 Control Corp. v. Velan, Inc., 438 F.3d 1374, 1380 (Fed.

Chaudry v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 20, 2022

California v. … See Martinez v.

Borrego Community Health Foundation v. Hebets

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 25, 2024

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). … U.S. v. Dunkel, 927 F.2d 955, 956 (7th Cir. 1991).

The Canadian Farmer

297 F. 500 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 25, 1924

Libelant sues for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered while working on board the Canadian Farmer, in port at San Pedro, in the early part of December, 1921. … The boom stay h .1 i q < 'en way at its lower fastening by the breaking of a Sc-inch rope, tier boom stay in its complete form, as carried as a part of the ship V\ equipment, was made up first of a wire rope (called a pennant

In Re Ringnalda

48 F. Supp. 975 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 19, 1943

In People v. … Board of Registration of Medicine, 1930, 128 Me. 523 , 149 A. 153 ), or impeachment of a witness (People v. Mackay, supra, Crawford v. United States, supra, Dial v.

United States v. Petersen

91 F. Supp. 209 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 22, 1950

Their application for a federal permit was refused by the regional director, but defendants hold a seasonal on-sale liquor license from the California State Board of Equalization. … See Johnson v. Morrill, 1942, 20 Cal.2d 446 , 126 P.2d 873, 877 ; Standard Oil Co. of California v. Johnson, 1938, 10 Cal.2d 758 , 76 P.2d 1184, 1188 ; cf. Fort Leavenworth R. Co. v.

Zinser-Furby, Inc. v. San Diego County District Council

516 F. Supp. 952 · District Court, S.D. California · May 15, 1981

See Rehart v. Clark, 448 F.2d 170, 174 (9th Cir. 1971); Colden v. Asmus, 322 F.Supp. 1163, 1165 (S.D.Cal.1971); 4 S. Williston, Contracts § 628 (3d ed. 1961). … (Note: The Joint Conference Board provisions of Master Labor Agreements are an example of Provisions peculiarly applicable only to signatories to that Agreement.) Plaintiffs Exhibit 6.

Turner v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 3, 2020

Ashcroft v. … Monell, 436 U.S. at 690; Board of the 15 County Commissioners v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 402-04 (1997); Navarro v. Block, 72 16 F.3d 712, 714 (9th Cir. 1995).

In re Wentworth Civil Rights Cases

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 4, 2022

Clark 4/16/2021 11 3:2021-cv-00692-BAS-AGS Wentworth et al v. Brown 4/16/2021 12 3:2021-cv-00693-BAS-AGS Hudson v. … Vista Unified School 33 3:2021-cv-00718-BAS-AGS 4/16/2021 District Board of Trustees et al 34 3:2021-cv-00719-BAS-AGS

McKinnie v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 9, 2024

Brown, 520 U.S. at 403; City of Canton v. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 6 520 U.S. 397, 398 (1997).

Southwest Center for Biological Diversity v. Bartel

470 F. Supp. 2d 1118 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 15, 2006

Ex. 4 (Sept.1999 BiOp on Brown Field). The Court hesitated to consider this information because it was created after FWS issued the City’s ITP. Fund for Animals v. … Marsh v.