Case law

Baiocchi v. Ewing

87 F. Supp. 520 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 8, 1949

Grace v. Magruder, 80 U.S.App. 53, 148 F.2d 679 ; Latimer v. U. S., D.C., 52 F.Supp. 228 ; Burger v. Social Security Board, D.C., 66 F.Supp. 619 . … Social Security Board v. Nierotko, 327 U.S. 358 , 66 S.Ct. 637 , 90 L.Ed, 718, 162 A.L.R. 1445 .

Swany v. San Ramon Valley Unified School District

720 F. Supp. 764 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 28, 1989

Board of Curators of University of Mo v. … Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 572-73 , 95 S.Ct. 729, 735 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975), citing Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Environmental Protection Information Center v. Pacific Lumber Co.

430 F. Supp. 2d 996 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 28, 2006

Board approves the NOT. … Idaho v.

In Re MIPS Technologies, Inc. Derivative Litigation

542 F. Supp. 2d 968 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 11, 2008

Compare Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 812 (Del.1984) with Rales v. Blasband, 634 A.2d 927, 933-34 (Del.1993). … See Anderson v. Seeman, 252 F.2d 321, 325-26 (5th Cir.1958); see also Desi-mone v.

Northern California District Council of Laborers v. Strauss Construction Co.

672 F. Supp. 430 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 27, 1987

United Brotherhood of Carpenters, Local 2247 v. Endicott Enterprises, Inc., 806 F.2d 918, 922 (9th Cir.1986); Operating Engineers Pension Trust v. Beck Engineering & Surveying Co., 746 F.2d 557, 561 (9th Cir.1984). … Celotex Corp. v. Catrell, 477 U.S. 317 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986).

In re Naturalization of Rodrigues

193 F. Supp. 150 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 8, 1961

and filed with his Draft Board his Application for Relief from Military Service; thereafter, on December 12, 1942, he was granted such relief by said Draft Board, and placed in Class IV-C, that of a neutral requesting relief … Moser v.

Elem Indian Colony of Pomo Indians of the Sulphur Bank Rancheria v. Ceiba Legal, LLP

230 F. Supp. 3d 1146 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 2, 2017

Newsham v. … In Makaeff v.

United States v. Juda

797 F. Supp. 774 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 11, 1992

However, every person on board Malekula has standing to challenge the legality of its stop. Rakas v. … This was a “seizure” of Malekula and her crew, whatever the commander’s subjective intent about boarding. See, United States v.

Bank of China v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.

92 F. Supp. 920 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 17, 1950

Insurance Companies, 1874, 22 Wall. 99 , 89 U.S. 99 , 22 L.Ed. 810 ; Baldy v. Hunter, 1898, 171 U.S. 388 , 18 S.Ct. 890 , 43 L.Ed. 208 ; Russian Reinsurance Co. v. … Note the somewhat similar situation in Russian Reinsurance Co. v. Stoddard, 1925, 240 N.Y. 149 , 147 N.E. 703 , and Andre v. Beha, 2d Dep’t 1925, 211 App.

Solis v. Webb

931 F. Supp. 2d 936 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 26, 2012

Donovan v. … Other Ninth Circuit and district court cases follow Batchelor in assigning this duty to members of a Board of Directors. See e.g. Johnson v.

Cuevas v. Wilson

264 F. Supp. 65 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 19, 1966

Cf., Boydston v. Wilson, 365 F.2d 238 (9th Cir. August 23,1966). 8 . Compare Browning v. … Carpenter v. Crouse, 358 F.2d 701 (10th Cir. 1966); See Browning v. Crouse, 356 F.2d 178 (10th Cir. 1966). 9 . Even if the teaching of McNally v.

Panah v. State of California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 2020

July 3, 2018) (same); 1 Brown v. County of L.A., No. CV-15-2162-DDP(FFM), 2018 WL 5907186, at *3-*4 (C.D. 2 Cal. … under the PLRA); Brown v.

Meyerhoff v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

728 F. Supp. 613 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 9, 1990

Long v. United States Internal Revenue Service, 742 F.2d 1173, 1179 (9th Cir.1984). … See Public Citizen v. United States Dept. of Justice, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 2558, 2563 , 105 L.Ed.2d 377 (1989); Physicians’ Education Network, Inc. v.

Botta v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 26, 2021

To further this watchdog function, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) have issued detailed auditor independence rules. … See Van Asdale v. Int’l Game Tech., 577 F.3d 989, 1000 (9th Cir. 2009) (articulating these requirements).

Federal Express Corp. v. California Public Utilities Commission

723 F. Supp. 1379 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 11, 1989

Federal Express relies on Brown-Forman Distillers v. … However, Brown-Forman and Healy involved entirely different facts than are presented here.

Grigorescu v. Board of Trustees of the San Mateo County Community College District

District Court, N.D. California · May 24, 2024

She made comments at a District Board of Trustees (“Board”) meeting and submitted a letter 21 to the Board expressing her appreciation of the gardens and nature. … See Skelly v. State Personnel Board, 15 Cal.3d 194, 194 (1975). It ensures 25 that the employee has due process rights. Ms. Grigorescu and Mr. Whitlock were present.

Bancroft—Whitney Co. v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.

61 F. 213 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 17, 1894

Jur. 185; Griswold v. The Nevada, 2 Sawy. 145 , Fed. Gas. No. 5,839; Willard v. Dorr, 3 Mason, 91 , Fed. Cas. No. 17,679; Brown v. Jones, *216 2 Gall. 480 , Fed. Cas. No. 2,017. … This was likewise held by Judge Brown in The Crapeshot, 22 Fed. 123 . Judge Brown says: “By the law of both countries [America and England] negligence in a common carrier is a tort as well as a breach of contract.”

Yturbide v. United States

30 F. Cas. 889 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 15, 1857

S. v. Marvin, 3 How. [44 U. … [Poultney v. City of La Fayette] 12 Pet. [37 U. S.] 472; [Saltmarsh v. Tuthill] 12 How. [53 U. S.] 389; [Bank of Alabama v. Dalton] 9 How. [50 U. S.] 522. .

Bogolub

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 30, 2026

FORMA PAUPERIS AND SCREENING PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 10 BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, … See Venable v. Meyers, 500 F.2d 1215, 1216 (9th Cir. 1974) (citations omitted). 24 Here, the Court has considered Plaintiff’s affidavit and finds that it satisfies the requirements of 25 Section 1915(a)(1).

MacKay v. Rafferty

321 F. Supp. 1177 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 24, 1970

be certified as a teacher in the public schools of the State of California unless he has subscribed to a “loyalty oath”, the terms of which are set forth below. 1 The oath is attacked on the grounds discussed in Baggett v. … The oath or affirmation shall be subscribed before any person authorized to administer oaths or before any member of the governing board of a school district or of any county board of education and filed with the State Board