The opinion
1
2
3
4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7 RICHARD SHELBY BOGOLUB, Case No.26-cv-06164-ASK
8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
9 v. FORMA PAUPERIS AND SCREENING
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
10 BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, Re: Dkt. No. 2
11
Defendant.
12
13 On June 22, 2026, Plaintiff Richard Shelby Bogolub filed this civil action and an
14 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. See generally Dkts. 1, 2. Pursuant to the in forma
15 pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the Court assesses the Application (Dkt. 2) and screens the
16 Complaint (Dkt. 1), as follows.
17 Ordinarily, a plaintiff bringing a civil action in federal court must pay a filing fee. See 28
18 U.S.C. § 1914(a). But a federal court “may authorize the commencement” of a civil suit without
19 prepayment of fees if the plaintiff submits an affidavit which “includes a statement of all assets”
20 and which shows that the plaintiff is “unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” 28 U.S.C.
21 § 1915(a)(1). The IFP statute does not provide further instruction with respect to assessing
22 indigency, which leaves the granting or denying of IFP status “within the sound discretion of the
23 district court.” See Venable v. Meyers, 500 F.2d 1215, 1216 (9th Cir. 1974) (citations omitted).
24 Here, the Court has considered Plaintiff’s affidavit and finds that it satisfies the requirements of
25 Section 1915(a)(1). See generally Dkt. 2. The Court accordingly GRANTS Plaintiff’s Application
26 to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.
27 The IFP statute also provides for dismissal if at any time the Court determines that the
] claim on which relief may be granted; or (111) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is
2 |} immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see Pratt v. Sumner, 807 F.2d 817, 819 (9th
3 Cir. 1987) (recognizing the general proposition that a complaint should be dismissed as frivolous
4 || on Section 1915 review where subject matter jurisdiction is lacking).
5 The Court has screened Plaintiff's Complaint pursuant to Section 1915(e)(2)(B). The Clerk
6 of Court SHALL issue the summons. Furthermore, the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of
7 || California SHALL serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the Complaint, any amendments
8 or attachments, and this Order upon Defendants.
9 While this case is pending, Plaintiff must promptly inform the Court of any change of
10 || address. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action. Because Plaintiff is unrepresented,
11 he may wish to contact the Federal Pro Bono Project’s Help Desk—a free service for
12 || unrepresented litigants—for assistance by calling (415) 782-8982 to make an appointment. While
13 || the Help Desk does not provide legal representation, a licensed attorney there may assist Plaintiff
14 || 1 preparing his case. Plaintiff may also wish to consult a handbook and other resources that the
3 15 Court has developed to assist unrepresented litigants, which may be accessed at:
16 https://cand.uscourts.gov/pro-se-litigants/.
17 IT IS SO ORDERED.
18 || Dated: July 30, 2026
19 : .
20 AY SN{RISHNAN
21 United States Magistrate Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28