Case law

Gradetech, Inc. v. City of San Jose

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 16, 2021

Id. at 4-5. 19 Thus, Defendants were entitled to qualified immunity on this claim. Id. at 5. … The Ninth 20 Circuit did not instruct the Court to grant leave to amend finding that amendment would be 21 futile “given the lack of clearly established law.”

Calhoun

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 20, 2026

, (2) CIF has state-action immunity under Parker v. … The court held these rules to be 22 immune. An injury that an immune, independent restraint would inflict regardless of the 23 challenged rule is not antitrust injury. L.A.

Shabazz v. Broomfield

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 25, 2023

ASSIGNED ISSUES 2 AND 3: PREP ACT IMMUNITY AND QUALIFIED 1 IMMUNITY 2 In an Order dated July 15, 2022 (Dkt. … June 7, 2022). 10 This immunity is well-established.

Mills v. Broomfield

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 25, 2023

ASSIGNED ISSUES 2 AND 3: PREP ACT IMMUNITY AND QUALIFIED 1 IMMUNITY 2 In an Order dated July 15, 2022 (Dkt. … June 7, 2022). 10 This immunity is well-established.

Dotsenko

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 2026

The second amended complaint 18 should clearly delineate each legal claim and state facts indicating the nature and grounds for each 19 claim. … Judicial Immunity 22 Even if the part of the lawsuit was not barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, Defendant 23 contends that a state judge is absolutely immune from

Marshall

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 11, 2026

AC Transit 7 also argues that that Hursh is entitled to qualified immunity for any claim that the complaint could 8 be construed to allege against him. Id. at 15. … His only response on the topic of qualified immunity is a header that states “The 11 Existence of Any Qualified Immunity Goes to the Issues of Individual Liability and Damages, Not 12 to Michael Hursh’s Role as Defendant

Collins v. County of Alameda

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 25, 2024

Potter, 422 F.3d 347, 352 (6th Cir. 2005) (stating that the 11 defense of qualified immunity “is not available to municipalities”); Ying Jing Gan v. … Clearly, then, there is 26 a time bar: Mr.

Phillips v. Diaz

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 27, 2023

ASSIGNED ISSUES 2 AND 3: PREP ACT IMMUNITY AND QUALIFIED 1 IMMUNITY 2 In an Order dated July 15, 2022 (Dkt. … June 7, 2022). 9 This immunity is well-established.

Bolden v. Allison

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 27, 2023

ASSIGNED ISSUES 2 AND 3: PREP ACT IMMUNITY AND QUALIFIED 1 IMMUNITY 2 In an Order dated July 15, 2022 (Dkt. … June 7, 2022). 9 This immunity is well-established.

Ulep v. Allison

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 27, 2023

ASSIGNED ISSUES 2 AND 3: PREP ACT IMMUNITY AND QUALIFIED 1 IMMUNITY 2 In an Order dated July 15, 2022 (Dkt. … June 7, 2022). 9 This immunity is well-established.

Fa' Aita v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 21, 2023

S. 603, 609 (1999) (qualified immunity analysis same under 16 Bivens and § 1983). Accordingly, when reviewing a Bivens action for which there is no 17 case on point, § 1983 cases may be applied by analogy. … United States, 18 511 F.3d 839, 844 (9th Cir. 2007) (applying § 1983 cases to analysis of Bivens claim that 19 officers used excessive force under Fourth Amendment, and of qualified immunity defense 20 to same claim

Smith v. State of California

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 27, 2023

ASSIGNED ISSUES 2 AND 3: PREP ACT IMMUNITY AND QUALIFIED 1 IMMUNITY 2 In an Order dated July 15, 2022 (Dkt. … June 7, 2022). 9 This immunity is well-established.

Watson v. Allison

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 27, 2023

ASSIGNED ISSUES 2 AND 3: PREP ACT IMMUNITY AND QUALIFIED 1 IMMUNITY 2 In an Order dated July 15, 2022 (Dkt. … June 7, 2022). 9 This immunity is well-established.

Petition of Agustin

62 F. Supp. 832 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 10, 1945

The question for decision is: Has the petitioner served in the military forces of the United States dtmng the present war, so as to qualify him for American citizenship? … I stated in the Petition of Delgado, D.C., 57 F.Supp. 460 , at page 462— “It was clearly the intent of Congress in adopting §' 701 to follow the historic course of granting the boon of citizenship to loyal aliens engaging

Guerra v. Montage Health

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 1, 2025

Disputed Facts Regarding Qualifying Disability 4 All of Plaintiff’s claims require that she establish a qualifying disability. … is no dispute that Defendants are a qualifying public entity for purposes of 16 the CDPA and a qualifying business establishment for purposes of the Unruh Act. 17 Third, there are genuine disputes of material

Narcisse v. Tafesse

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 16, 2019

immunity issue and held that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the officers were entitled qualified immunity for 27 the alleged unreasonable search and seizure. … Qualified Immunity 2 Because this Court decides this motion on the stated grounds, it will not address the 3 qualified immunity arguments. 4 IV.

Marshall

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 13, 2026

AC Transit 8 also argues that that Hursh is entitled to qualified immunity for any claim that the complaint could 9 be construed to allege against him. Id. at 15. … His only response on the topic of qualified immunity is a header that states “The 12 Existence of Any Qualified Immunity Goes to the Issues of Individual Liability and Damages, Not 13 to Michael Hursh’s Role as Defendant

Apex Directional Drilling, LLC v. SHN Consulting Engineers & Geologists, Inc.

119 F. Supp. 3d 1117 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 2015

Relying on SHN’s representations regarding conditions at the project site, Apex Directional Drilling, LLC (“Apex”), a leading HDD contractor, submitted the lowest qualifying bid (approximately $3.6 million) and entered into … Yet, as SHN conceded at oral argument, Ratcliff did not establish any bright-line rule that participants in construction projects are categorically immune from tort liability to one another. 88 Cal.App.4th at 607 , 106 Cal

O'Neal v. Allison

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 25, 2023

ASSIGNED ISSUES 2 AND 3: PREP ACT IMMUNITY AND QUALIFIED 1 IMMUNITY 2 In an Order dated July 15, 2022 (Dkt. … June 7, 2022). 10 This immunity is well-established.

Bryant Jr. v. Davis

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 25, 2023

ASSIGNED ISSUES 2 AND 3: PREP ACT IMMUNITY AND QUALIFIED 1 IMMUNITY 2 In an Order dated July 15, 2022 (Dkt. … June 7, 2022). 10 This immunity is well-established.