Case law

Barahona-Gomez v. Ashcroft

243 F. Supp. 2d 1029 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 18, 2002

of Immigration Appeals — is issuing this Advisory Statement to inform the public about the settlement agreement in the Barahoma-Gomez v. … In cases of eligible class members currently pending before the Board of Immigration Appeals, the Board will remand the case to the Immigration Judge to schedule a hearing for renewed suspension.

Haas v. Freight, Construction, General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local No. 287

832 F. Supp. 283 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 27, 1993

The decision was appealed to the General Executive Board. The Executive Board, in turn, affirmed the Joint Council’s decision. … Bise v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 618 F.2d 1299 , 1305-06 (9th Cir.1979); Christopher v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 476 F.Supp. 950, 955 (E.D.Tex.1979), aff'd 644 F.2d 467 (5th Cir. 1981), and Ross v.

Allstate Insurance v. Miller

743 F. Supp. 723 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 19, 1990

Brown, 18 Cal.App.3d 98, 103 , 95 Cal.Rptr. 742 (1971). *728 Even when pleaded as an independent cause of action, as in the Merlino Complaint, the claim for emotional distress is barred. In the recent case of Kruse v. … Grenell v. City of Hermosa Beach, 103 Cal.App.3d 864 , 163 Cal.Rptr. 315 (1980); Clar v. Board of Trade of San Francisco, 164 Cal.App.2d 636 , 331 P.2d 89 (1958). 8 . Bagdasarian v.

Pallazhco v. Acevedo

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 30, 2022

See West v. Atkins, 22 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988). 23 CDCR is not a “person” subject to suit under Section 1983. See Brown v. … Amendment immunity.”); Maldonado v.

Smith v. Ricks

798 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 15, 1992

Austin v. McNamara, 731 F.Supp. 934, 939 (C.D.Cal.1990). a. … This finding of the Court is premised on the analysis set out above, v.

In Re McKesson HBOC, Inc. ERISA Litigation

391 F. Supp. 2d 812 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 9, 2005

See, e.g., U.S. v. … See, e.g., West v.

Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. Kidwell

716 F. Supp. 1315 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 10, 1989

In May, 1983, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (“FHLBB”) issued 12 C.F.R. § 545.2 , which provides that the Board’s regulations “are promulgated pursuant to the plenary and exclusive authority of the Board to regulate all … Similar reasoning was present in United Services Automobile Ass’n v. Foster, 680 F.Supp. 712, 717 (M.D.Pa.1987), aff'd in part and rev’d in part, Ford Motor Co. v.

Hernandez v. Veterans Administration

339 F. Supp. 913 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 8, 1972

Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961); Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 , 83 S.Ct. 1790 , 10 L.Ed.2d 965 (1963). … See Braunfeld v. Brown, supra.

Hart v. Curry

716 F. Supp. 2d 863 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 2010

See Gzikowski v. Dexter, No. … In focusing on the narrow holding in Greenholtz, the government overlooks a more relevant rule established in Greenholtz and a subsequent case, Board of Pardons v.

Esquivel v. San Francisco Unified School District

630 F. Supp. 2d 1055 · District Court, N.D. California · May 16, 2008

Dist. v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260, 266 , 108 S.Ct. 562 , 98 L.Ed.2d 592 (1988). In Rosenberger v. … In the same vein, in Rust v.

Hungerford v. United States

192 F. Supp. 581 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 1961

Brown, 348 U.S. 110 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 ). … Brown, supra, applies to the instant case.

The Carriso

27 F.2d 1015 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 2, 1928

Armour & Co., Ltd., v. Walford, 28 Com. Cases, 37. Libelants cannot recover, therefore, unless the bill of lading clause in question is invalid. Armour & Co., Ltd., v. … Lawrence v. Minturn, 17 How. (58 U. S.) 100, 15 L. Ed. 58 . Such stipulation is not expressly barred by terms of the statute.

Yost v. United States

212 F. Supp. 410 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 7, 1963

In the case of Brown v. … Phillips Waste Oil Pick-up & Road Oil Service, D.C., 17 F.R.D. 495 ; and Kuhn v. Yellow Transit Freight Lines, D.C., 12 F.R.D. 252 . The attempt of United States to differentiate Brown v.

Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. Musacchio

695 F. Supp. 1053 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 17, 1988

Until the Columbus Board of Directors (“Board”) terminated his employment in late 1985, the defendant served as Columbus’ president. … In FSLIC v.

United States v. Allen

349 F. Supp. 749 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 11, 1972

As stated in Verdugo v. … It should bo noted that by this time the jet Allen intended to board had departed.

Lesbian/Gay Freedom Day Committee, Inc. v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service

541 F. Supp. 569 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 17, 1982

In Boutilier v. … In Kleindienst v.

Gresham v. Franklin

315 F. Supp. 850 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 29, 1970

Ross v. McLaughlin, 308 F.Supp. 1019,1024 (E.D.Va.1970). … Morton v. McBee, 310 F.Supp. 328, 332 (N.D.I11.1970).

United States v. Guevara

745 F. Supp. 2d 1039 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 28, 2010

United States v. Blom, 242 F.3d 799, 808 (8th Cir.2001); United States v. Lemons, 153 F.Supp.2d 948, 959-960 (E.D.Wis. 2001). … Similarly, the government cites United States v.

The Board of Trustees, et al. v. Pipe-Net, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 13, 2026

Cripps v. Life Ins. Co. of N. … Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 10 (2011)).

McCormick-Morgan, Inc. v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.

765 F. Supp. 611 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 19, 1991

Weil v. Investment/Indicators, Research & Management, 647 F.2d 18 , 24 (9th Cir.1981). … Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson, 413 F.Supp. 926, 929 (N.D.Cal.1975). The rationale has been extended to attempts to limit discovery to the time period prior to the voluntary waiver. Smith v.