Case law

In Re Extreme Networks, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation

573 F. Supp. 2d 1228 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 23, 2008

Johnson v. … The board in place at the time Grucel filed suit was not the same as the board in place between 1999 and 2003. Accordingly, the court applies the Rales standard to decide whether demand is excused. Accord Desimone v.

Phillips

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 7, 2025

(quoting 8 Schneider v. Cal. … See Franchise 12 Tax Bd. of California v. Hyatt, 587 U.S. 230, 249 (2019); O’Neal v. Allison, No. 22-cv-07367-JD, 5 13 || 2023 WL 1071645, at *2 (N.D. Cal.

M.H. v. County of Alameda

62 F. Supp. 3d 1049 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2014

Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)). … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Old. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

Escalante v. San Francisco Community College District, and Board of Trustees

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 11, 2021

Corp. v. … Ashcroft v.

United States v. Bulger

338 F. Supp. 629 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 2, 1972

This Court is bound by United States v. … Note that in United States v.

United States v. Bower

307 F. Supp. 1094 · District Court, N.D. California · May 12, 1969

Boswell v. United States, 390 F.2d 181 (1969), is urged on this Court as controlling. Unlike the present case, in the Boswell case the court did not have the completed form 150 before it. … This Court is ruled by Blades v.

Shanko v. Lake County

116 F. Supp. 3d 1055 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 27, 2015

Lujan v. … Conner v.

Paulekas v. Clark

291 F. Supp. 606 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 30, 1968

Selective Service Local Board No. 16, 284 F.Supp. 749 (Conn.1968); Carpenter v. Hendrix, 277 F.Supp. 660 (N.D.Ga.1967); Moskowitz v. … Selective Service Local Board No. 5 (2 Cir. 1968), stay of induction denied 391 U.S. 930 , 88 S.Ct. 1831 , 20 L.Ed.2d 849 , May 27, 1968; Zigmon v.

Johnson v. Hui

752 F. Supp. 909 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 21, 1990

(See Starrels v. … The two eases cited in Greenspun and reviewed in Lewis v. Sporck support this conclusion. Heit v.

Mooney v. Holohan

7 F. Supp. 385 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 27, 1934

The case of Urquhart v. Brown, 205 U. S. 179, 181 , 27 S. Ct. 459, 460 , 51 L. … The Circuit Court (Brown v. Urquhart, 139 F. 846 ) adopted that view and discharged the appellee, but the Supreme Court reversed the judgment.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. United Parcel Services, Inc.

149 F. Supp. 2d 1115 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 12, 2000

Raymond Brown 195. Raymond Brown has been employed by UPS as a full-time mechanic in Dothan, Alabama, since 1976. The issue with Mr. Brown is different from the other *1156 claimants. … Here is why: The “direct threat” clause derives from School Board of Nassau County v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273, 287-88 , 107 S.Ct. 1123 , 94 L.Ed.2d 307 (1987).

Repetti v. Jamison

131 F. Supp. 626 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 2, 1955

Oil Fields v. … In Maxwell v.

Berman v. Resor

302 F. Supp. 1200 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 1969

Bolger v. Marshall, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 30 , 193 F.2d 37 (1951); Babcock v. Koepke, 175 F.2d 923 (9th Cir. 1949). … Petitioner has not exhausted his administrative remedies in that he has not received a decision from the Board for the Correction of Military Records before which his case is currently pending. Craycroft v.

Kindem v. City of Alameda

502 F. Supp. 1108 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 11, 1980

Butts v. Nichols, 381 F.Supp. 573, 580-82 (S.D.Ia.1974) (three-judge district court) (discussing a similar across-the-board “felon ban”). 9 . E. g., Thompson v. … Accord, Clark v. Whiting, 607 F.2d 634 , 641 n. 17 (4th Cir. 1976); Sullivan v. Brown, 544 F.2d 279, 282 (6th Cir. 1976); Weathers v. West Yuma County School Dist. R-J-I, 530 F.2d 1335, 1340-41 (10th Cir. 1976); Buhr v.

MetroPCS, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco

259 F. Supp. 2d 1004 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 25, 2003

Sprint Spectrum L.P. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Brookhaven, 244 F.Supp.2d 108, 117 (E.D.N.Y.2003). … USCOC of Virginia RSA#3, Inc. v. Montgomery County Board of Supervisors, 245 F.Supp.2d 817, 827 (W.D.Va.2003).

American President Lines, Ltd. v. United States

208 F. Supp. 573 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 1961

See e. g., Reardon Smith Line Ltd. v. Australian Wheat Board, 1956 Appeal Cases 266; Companía Naviera Maropan v. Bowaters, 2 Q.B. 68 (1955); G. W. Grace & Co., Ltd. v. … Dougherty Co. v. Bader Coal Co., 244 F. 267 (D.C.Mass.1917); The Northman, 189 F. 33 (2 Cir. 1911). 2 . Reardon Smith Line Ltd. v. Australian Wheat Board, 1956 Appeal Cases 266; Compañía Naviera Maropan v.

Hardy v. Leonard

377 F. Supp. 831 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 26, 1974

Jenkins v. United Gas Corp., 400 F.2d 28 (5th Cir. 1968); Cypress v. Newport News General Hospital, 375 F.2d 648 (4th Cir. 1967); Buckner v. County School Board of Greene County, 332 F.2d 452 (4th Cir. 1964). … Buckner v. County School Board of Greene County, supra, is inapposite.

Rupp v. Teets

117 F. Supp. 376 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 21, 1953

Consult Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 . Accordingly, the order to show cause herein is discharged and the petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. . Cf. Thomas v. … Justice Carter, People v.

United States v. Yee Ngee How

105 F. Supp. 517 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 12, 1952

Landau v. … Ash Sheep Co. v.

Badham v. March Fong Eu

694 F. Supp. 664 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 1988

Brown, Jr., a Democrat, signed A.B. 301 into law on September 16, 1981. … On December 29, A.B. 2X, a previously-passed Board of Equalization reapportionment bill, was withdrawn from Governor Brown's desk and amended to include new congressional districts, allegedly based on the rejected A.B. 301