Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

0.67s

  • United States v. Tetra Tech EC, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · May 7, 2025

    P. 26(b). 7 V. … TETRA TECH BOARD MATERIALS 18 Five Point and CP request that the Court compel the production of the Board-related 19 materials they requested from Tetra Tech, because it “defies

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • People ex rel. Foxx v. Facebook (In re Facebook, Inc., Consumer Privacy User Profile Litig.)

    354 F. Supp. 3d 1122 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 29, 2019

    ."); LG Display Co. v. … In re Korean Air Lines , 642 F.3d at 699 -700 & n.12 ; Menowitz v. Brown , 991 F.2d 36 , 40 (2d Cir. 1993) ; In re Korean Air Lines Disaster of Sept. 1, 1983 , 829 F.2d 1171 , 1176 (D.C. Cir. 1987), aff'd sub nom.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Castillo-Antonio v. Deumah

    District Court, N.D. California · Dec 6, 2022

    Savage v. Glendale Union High School, 343 F.3d 1036, 1039 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2003). … See, e.g., Whitaker v. Panama Joes Investors LLC, 840 F. App’x 961, 963 (9th Cir. 2021); Whitaker v. Tesla Motors, Inc., 985 F.3d 1173, 1179 (9th Cir. 2021).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • English v. AM Resorts

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 1, 2021

    See Ranza v. … Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011) (quoting Int’l Shoe, 7 326 U.S. at 317).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Reyes v. Bakery & Confectionery Union

    170 F. Supp. 3d 1239 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 22, 2016

    Defendants include the Pension Fund, its Board of Trustees, and individually named Trustees. Id. ¶¶ 15-17. … Mertens v. Kaiser Steel Ret. Plan, 829 F.Supp. 1158, 1163 (N.D.Cal. 1992); Richards v. Union Labor Life Ins. Co., 804 F.Supp. 1101, 1103-05 (D.Minn. 1992); see also Bourns, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • JW Gaming Development, LLC v. James

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 7, 2021

    See Kowalski v. Tesmer, 543 U.S. 125, 21 130 (2004). … See e.g., United States v. Conces, 507 F.3d 22 1028, 1040 (6th Cir. 2007) (quoting Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. LeGrand, 43 F.3d 163, 172 (5th 23 Cir. 1995)); see also Comerica Bank v. Esshaki, 314 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Taylor v. Gipson

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 2021

    West v. … Malik v. 10 Brown, 16 F.3d 330, 333 (9th Cir. 1994) (cited with approval in Shakur, 514 F.3d at 884). 11 Plaintiff professes to be an adherent of “Thelema” and expresses his beliefs through 12 consumption of

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • League of Women Voters of Cupertino-Sunnyvale v. City of Cupertino

    District Court, N.D. California · May 1, 2023

    Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (citing 9 Papasan v. … Turner Board. Sys. v. 21 FCC, 512 U.S. 622, 657-58 (1994). The reporting and disclosure requirements do not 22 “substantially interfere with the ability of the lobbyist to raise his voice.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tech. Credit Corp. v. N.J. Christian Acad., Inc.

    307 F. Supp. 3d 993 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 2018

    Shinn is the founder of NJCA and the current Chairman and Director of the Board (Shinn Decl. ¶ 3), and the prefix before his name indicates that Dr. Shinn is highly educated. … ."); Akers Biosciences, Inc. v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Devlin

    District Court, N.D. California · May 26, 2026

    See Sanders v. Brown, 20 504 F.3d 903, 910 (9th Cir. 2007). The court may consider matters that are properly the subject of 21 judicial notice, Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1076 (9th Cir. 2005); Lee v. … Sparling v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fullove v. Fullove

    District Court, N.D. California · Dec 2, 2024

    Defendant suggested Plaintiff join the HOA Board. … See, e.g., White Lighting Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • GS Holistic, LLC v. Abbasi

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 18, 2024

    See 11 Mason v. Genisco Tech. … Ltd. v. Tong Soo Chung, 725 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kokal v. Massanari

    163 F. Supp. 2d 1122 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 18, 2001

    See Holohan v. … See Brown v. Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 443 (9th Cir.1983).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • The Pioneer

    78 F. 600 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 5, 1897

    See, also, Hough v. Railway Co., 100 U. S. 213 ; Railroad Co. v. Herbert, 116 U. S. 642 , 6 Sup. Ct. 590; Mullin v. Horseshoe Co., 105 Cal. 77 , 38 Pac. 535 , and cases there cited; Eingartner v. Steel Co. (Wis.) 68 N. … Hermann v. Mill Co., supra; Cheeney v. Steamship Co. (Ga.) 19 S. E. 33 . The case of Hermann v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • MaxPower Semiconductor, Inc. v. Rohm Semiconductor USA, LLC

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 29, 2021

    Rohm nonetheless continues to pursue invalidation of MaxPower’s patents before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). … See, e.g., Circuit City Stores, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Soucek v. Roblox Corporation

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 19, 2024

    Brown v. USA Taekwondo, 11 Cal. 5th 204, 214 (Cal. 2021) (quoting Lugtu v. California Highway Patrol, 26 Cal. 4th 703, 716 (Cal. 2001)). … Kyablue v. Watkins, 210 Cal. App. 4th 1288, 1292 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012) (quoting Tri-Q, Inc. v. Sta-Hi Corp., 63 Cal. 2d 199, 218-19 (Cal. 1965)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Consol. Pretrial Proceedings in Air West

    436 F. Supp. 1281 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 6, 1977

    E. g., Conti v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners, 1 Cal.3d 351, 356-62 , 82 Cal.Rptr. 337 , 461 P.2d 617 (1969). … Air West Incorporated, et al.; C-74-2475 AJZ, Beecher, et al. v. Lummis, et al.; C-75-0945 AJZ, Silverstein, et al. v. Lummis, et al.; C-75-1681 AJZ, Lanier, et al. v. Lummis, et al.; C-74-2444 AJZ, Sipiora v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Faizi v. Temori

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 12, 2022

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). … Clegg v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. City and County of San Francisco

    23 F. Supp. 40 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 1938

    Ruddy v. … In re Sachs, D.C.1929, 31 F.2d 799 ; Ferry & Co. v. Hall, 1914, 188 Ala. 178 , 66 So. 104 , L.R.A.1917B, 620; Coweta Fertilizer Co. v. Brown, 6 Cir., 1908, 163 F. 162 ; Peoria Mfg. Co. v.

    Reversed by City & County of San Francisco v. United States, 106 F.2d 569 (1939)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Raskin v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 12, 2025

    See Sanders v. Brown, 21 504 F.3d 903, 910 (9th Cir. 2007). The court may consider matters that are properly the subject of 22 judicial notice, Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 1076 (9th Cir. 2005); Lee v. … Sparling v. Daou, 411 F.3d 1006, 1013 (9th Cir. 1 B.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.