Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
1.99s
Stem, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
District Court, N.D. California · Jul 20, 2020
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 18 U.S. 662, 697 (2009) (citing Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Tellabs, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownValley Community Bank v. Progressive Casualty Insurance
854 F. Supp. 2d 697 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 22, 2012
In KW Bancshares, Inc. v. … Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 168 Cal.App.4th 938, 958-59 , 85 Cal.Rptr.3d 817 (2008). Here, Plaintiff had the opportunity to read the Bond, including the Anti-Bundling clause.
Cited 6 timesPublishedCitizens for a Better Environment v. Deukmejian
746 F. Supp. 976 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 28, 1990
CBE v. Deukmejian, 731 F.Supp. at 1458. … CBE v. Deukmejian, 731 F.Supp. at 1461 .
Cited 14 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Nov 30, 2020
See Zichko v. … See Martinez v. Johnson, 104 F.3d 769, 772 (Sth Cir. 18 1997) (Rule 41(b) applicable in habeas cases). 19 5.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Dec 1, 2025
See, e.g., Jimenez v. Haxton Masonry, Inc., No. 18-cv-07109-SVK, 2019 WL 9573762, at *2-3 (N.D. Cal. May 10, 2019); see also Widevine Techs., Inc. v. … See Brown v. Newsom, No. 23-cv-04040-RFL, 2024 WL 2853978, at *3 (N.D. Cal. May 1, 2024). Moreover, each side cites statistics favoring its preferred forum. Accordingly, this factor is neutral.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBoston Scientific Corp. v. Cordis Corp.
422 F. Supp. 2d 1102 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 1, 2006
Consistent with the truism that: “that which infringes if later anticipates if earlier,” Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 1352 (Fed.Cir.2001), “every prior art reference must be considered together with the knowledge of one of … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Mar 9, 2022
Brown v. Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 443 (9th Cir. 1983). 6 Here, the ALJ set forth the applicable law under the required five-step sequential 7 evaluation process. AR at 16-17. … (citing 23 Smolen v. Chater, 80 F.3d 1273, 1288 (9th Cir. 1996)). This duty to develop the record is 24 incumbent and applicable even when claimants are represented by counsel. Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNatural Resources Defense Council v. Evans
243 F. Supp. 2d 1046 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 17, 2003
Peacock v. … Miles & Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedOceanic California, Inc. v. City of San Jose
497 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 21, 1980
Board of Supervisors, San Diego County, 65 Cal.App.3d 723 , 135 Cal.Rptr. 588 (1977). See generally, Perry, Local “General Plan” in California, 9 San Diego L.Rev. 1 (1971). … In Andrus v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedJW Gaming Development, LLC v. James
District Court, N.D. California · Jun 7, 2021
See Kowalski v. Tesmer, 543 U.S. 125, 21 130 (2004). … See e.g., United States v. Conces, 507 F.3d 22 1028, 1040 (6th Cir. 2007) (quoting Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. LeGrand, 43 F.3d 163, 172 (5th 23 Cir. 1995)); see also Comerica Bank v. Esshaki, 314 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Oct 31, 2025
parties. 3 Second, the Court orders Sunrise to respond to RFP No. 26, which seeks documents showing 4 the number of employees who were unable to serve a tour of duty on board … Friends of Hope Valley v. Frederick 2 Co., 268 F.R.D. 643, 650-51 (E.D. Cal. 2010) (citation omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknownCertain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Argonaut Insurance
264 F. Supp. 2d 914 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2003
As noted in Teradyne Inc. v. … Morrison Knudsen Corp. v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedAiyahnna Johnson, et al. v. Alameda County Social Services Agency, et al.
District Court, N.D. California · Apr 10, 2026
McHenry v. … See Bautista v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Feb 14, 2023
Khoja v. … Louis v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDali Wireless, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications LLC
District Court, N.D. California · May 5, 2022
Read Corp. v. Portec, Inc., 970 F.2d 816, 826-27 (Fed. … The SAC contains factual by sending a representative to Finjan's board meetings and attending 1 a presentation.
Cited 0 timesUnknown10 F. Supp. 3d 1062 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 3, 2014
Bates v. … Hernandez v.
Cited 24 timesPublishedCTIA—The Wireless Ass'n v. City & County of San Francisco
827 F. Supp. 2d 1054 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 27, 2011
On July 26, 2011, the Board unanimously enacted the amended ordinance. It has three main requirements. … This case is unlike Farina v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBarajas v. City of Rohnert Park
159 F. Supp. 3d 1016 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 5, 2016
Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (citations omitted). … Brown, 520 U.S. at 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 . Moreover, “a local governmental body may be liable if it has a policy of inaction and such inaction amounts to a failure to protect constitutional rights.” Oviatt v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSenne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.
105 F. Supp. 3d 981 · District Court, N.D. California · May 20, 2015
(quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, — U.S.-,-, 131 S.Ct. 2846, 2851 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011) (quotations and citations omitted)). … (citing Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, — U.S.-,-, 131 S.Ct. 2846, 2851 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011), Tuazon v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 433 F.3d 1163, 1169 (9th Cir.2006)).
Cited 19 timesPublished
Ask Donna