Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
1.19s
District Court, N.D. California · Nov 30, 2020
See Zichko v. … See Martinez v. Johnson, 104 F.3d 769, 772 (Sth Cir. 18 1997) (Rule 41(b) applicable in habeas cases). 19 5.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Dec 1, 2025
See, e.g., Jimenez v. Haxton Masonry, Inc., No. 18-cv-07109-SVK, 2019 WL 9573762, at *2-3 (N.D. Cal. May 10, 2019); see also Widevine Techs., Inc. v. … See Brown v. Newsom, No. 23-cv-04040-RFL, 2024 WL 2853978, at *3 (N.D. Cal. May 1, 2024). Moreover, each side cites statistics favoring its preferred forum. Accordingly, this factor is neutral.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jul 10, 2025
See Soto v. … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Oct 31, 2025
parties. 3 Second, the Court orders Sunrise to respond to RFP No. 26, which seeks documents showing 4 the number of employees who were unable to serve a tour of duty on board … Friends of Hope Valley v. Frederick 2 Co., 268 F.R.D. 643, 650-51 (E.D. Cal. 2010) (citation omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknownCertain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Argonaut Insurance
264 F. Supp. 2d 914 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2003
As noted in Teradyne Inc. v. … Morrison Knudsen Corp. v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedOceanic California, Inc. v. City of San Jose
497 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 21, 1980
Board of Supervisors, San Diego County, 65 Cal.App.3d 723 , 135 Cal.Rptr. 588 (1977). See generally, Perry, Local “General Plan” in California, 9 San Diego L.Rev. 1 (1971). … In Andrus v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Feb 14, 2023
Khoja v. … Louis v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCalifornia River Watch v. Fluor Corp.
119 F. Supp. 3d 1108 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 7, 2015
For example, in Kotrous v. Goss-Jewett Co. of N. … See, e.g., Axel Johnson, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAiyahnna Johnson, et al. v. Alameda County Social Services Agency, et al.
District Court, N.D. California · Apr 10, 2026
McHenry v. … See Bautista v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDali Wireless, Inc. v. Corning Optical Communications LLC
District Court, N.D. California · May 5, 2022
Read Corp. v. Portec, Inc., 970 F.2d 816, 826-27 (Fed. … The SAC contains factual by sending a representative to Finjan's board meetings and attending 1 a presentation.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAmerican Baptist Churches v. Thornburgh
760 F. Supp. 796 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 31, 1991
If your case is on appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), and you want ABC benefits, YOU MUST WRITE THE BIA at 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2400, Falls Church, Virginia 22041 and ask them to close your case. … FEDERAL COURT CASES: Zacarías v. INS, No. 88-7507 (9th Cir.) Canas-Segovia v. INS, No. 88-7444 (9th Cir.) Aguilera-Cota v. INS, No. 88-7389 (9th Cir.) Ramirez-Rivas v. INS, No. 88-7463 (9th Cir.)
Cited 98 timesPublishedSenne v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Corp.
105 F. Supp. 3d 981 · District Court, N.D. California · May 20, 2015
(quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, — U.S.-,-, 131 S.Ct. 2846, 2851 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011) (quotations and citations omitted)). … (citing Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, — U.S.-,-, 131 S.Ct. 2846, 2851 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011), Tuazon v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 433 F.3d 1163, 1169 (9th Cir.2006)).
Cited 19 timesPublished10 F. Supp. 3d 1062 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 3, 2014
Bates v. … Hernandez v.
Cited 24 timesPublishedCTIA—The Wireless Ass'n v. City & County of San Francisco
827 F. Supp. 2d 1054 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 27, 2011
On July 26, 2011, the Board unanimously enacted the amended ordinance. It has three main requirements. … This case is unlike Farina v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBarajas v. City of Rohnert Park
159 F. Supp. 3d 1016 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 5, 2016
Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (citations omitted). … Brown, 520 U.S. at 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 . Moreover, “a local governmental body may be liable if it has a policy of inaction and such inaction amounts to a failure to protect constitutional rights.” Oviatt v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedIn re California Bail Bond Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California · Mar 11, 2025
United States v. … For example, Holtschneider 6 and Southey shared the substance of Hogeboom’s advice ahead of the November 9 ABC board 7 meeting, and also indicated an intent to discuss his advice with third parties at the board meeting
Cited 0 timesUnknownTransfresh Corp. v. Ganzerla & Assoc., Inc.
862 F. Supp. 2d 1009 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 23, 2012
California Milk Producers Advisory Board, 125 Cal. App.4th 871 , 22 Cal.Rptr.3d 900, 902 (2005) (noting that Cal. … Putnam v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Mar 9, 2022
Brown v. Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 443 (9th Cir. 1983). 6 Here, the ALJ set forth the applicable law under the required five-step sequential 7 evaluation process. AR at 16-17. … (citing 23 Smolen v. Chater, 80 F.3d 1273, 1288 (9th Cir. 1996)). This duty to develop the record is 24 incumbent and applicable even when claimants are represented by counsel. Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown713 F. Supp. 2d 871 · District Court, N.D. California · May 4, 2010
In Hassan v. … The Board of Immigration Appeals has similarly held — in unpublished opinions cited by Defendants' — that paragraph (i) does “not place upon USCIS a requirement that the actual documents be provided to a petitioner in order
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Nov 21, 2022
Delaye v. Agripac, Inc., 39 F.3d 235, 237 (9th Cir. 1994). … Claims are determined by a Committee “consisting of 5 at least three persons appointed by and serving at the pleasure of the Board of Directors of the 6 || Company.” Plan § 3.)
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna