Case law

The Munrio

11 F.2d 900 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 1, 1926

A. 32 ; Lie v. San Francisco & Portland Steamship Co., 37 S. Ct. 270 , 243 U. S. 291, 296 , 61 L. Ed. 726 ), and with which during a space of 17 minutes admittedly no attempt whatever was made to comply. … It is further contended that the evidence fails to disclose that a lookout was on duty on board the Munrio at the time of the accident, and it is admitted that efforts to produce him were unavailing.

Olivera v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.

689 F. Supp. 2d 1218 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 22, 2010

Congress delegated the responsibility of developing regulations to carry out the purposes of TILA to the Federal Reserve Board (“Board”). 15 U.S.C. § 1604 (a). … In response, the Board promulgated “Regulation Z,” 12 C.F.R. § 226.1 , and published its interpretation of Regulation Z in the “Official Staff Interpretation,” 12 C.F.R. pt. 226 Supp. I. McCoy v.

Gonzales v. Costle

463 F. Supp. 335 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 26, 1978

Brown, Jr. and State Water Resources Control Board, and cross motions have been brought for summary judgment by plaintiffs and defendants EPA and ABAG. … See Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727 , 92 S.Ct. 1361 , 31 L.Ed.2d 636 (1972), and United States v. SCRAP, 412 U.S. 669 , 93 S.Ct. 2405 , 37 L.Ed.2d 254 (1973).

Brown

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 9, 2025

See Balistreri v. … Clegg v.

Jasso v. Money Mart Express, Inc.

879 F. Supp. 2d 1038 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 13, 2012

The Board held in D.R. … See, e.g., Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 197 Cal.App.4th 489, 499 , 128 Cal.Rptr.3d 854 (2011); Urbino v. Orkin Services of California, Inc., 849 F.Supp.2d 902, 912-14 , 2011 WL 4595249, *10-11 (C.D.Cal.2011). .

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Fremont Christian School

609 F. Supp. 344 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 16, 1984

of the Church upon the recommendation of the school board. … E.g., Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 [ 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 ] (1961) (state law prohibiting retail sales on Sunday).” Pacific Press, supra, 626 F.2d at 1280 .

Kaplan v. Burroughs Corp.

426 F. Supp. 1328 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 4, 1977

Whitten, Jr., Inc. v. … See Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., and George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc. v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc., both supra.

Brown

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 21, 2025

Given that “[t]he Ninth Circuit has long held that nonparties subject to discovery requests deserve extra protection from the courts,” Lemberg Law LLC v. Hussin, No. 16-mc- 80066, 2016 WL 3231300, at *5 (N.D. Cal. … P. 26(b)(2)(C)(i); see also Soto v. Castlerock Farming & Transp., Inc., 282 F.R.D. 492, 505 (E.D.

Larry P. v. Riles

495 F. Supp. 926 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 16, 1979

Penick, supra; Dayton Board of Education v. Brinkman, supra. Both cases affirmed appellate court decisions that school boards had operated dual school systems at the time of Brown v. … See, e. g., United States v. Texas Education Agency, 579 F.2d 710 (5th Cir. 1978); Stark v. Shell Oil Co., 450 F.2d 994 (5th Cir. 1971). Since Brown v.

Chau

District Court, N.D. California · May 12, 2026

Brown Act and Sunshine Ordinance 19 The Brown Act requires “[a]ll meetings of the legislative body of a local agency” to “be 20 open and public,” and that meeting agendas “provide an … The Board of Supervisors held an open meeting on January 14th, 2025 where ] Board of Supervisors website.

Nanavati v. Adecco USA, Inc.

99 F. Supp. 3d 1072 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 13, 2015

Id. at 362 ; see Richards v. Ernst & Young, LLP, 744 F.3d 1072 , 1075 n. 3 (9th Cir.2013) (observing number of federal courts that have rejected Horton I); see also Brown v. … Eisenstein v.

Operating Engineers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California v. Precision Drilling, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2025

Brown Decl., Ex. … Co. v.

Lerwill v. Inflight Services, Inc.

379 F. Supp. 690 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 24, 1974

Case Co. v. … Western Addition Community Organization v. N. L. R. B., 158 U.S.App.D.C. 138 , 485 F.2d 917, 937 (1973); Bryant v. International Union, U.M.W. of America, 467 F.2d 1 , 2-3, n. 1 (6th Cir. 1972); Brown v.

Pinkston v. Lamarque

247 F. Supp. 2d 1145 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 18, 2003

In Andrade v. Att *1148 orney General, 270 F.3d 743 (9th Cir.2001), ce rt. granted, Lockyer v. … See United States v. Bland, 961 F.2d 123, 128-29 (9th Cir.1992); see also United States v.

Holly v. Jewell

196 F. Supp. 3d 1079 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 11, 2016

Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 825 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … (citing Brown, 425 U.S. at 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 ). But see Arnold v.

Williford v. People of California

217 F. Supp. 245 · District Court, N.D. California · May 7, 1963

Pierce v. La Vallee, 2 Cir., 293 F.2d 233 ; Sewell v. Pegelow, 4 Cir., 291 F.2d 196 ; 4 Cir., 304 F.2d 670 ; Fulwood v. Clemmer, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 184 , 295 F.2d 171 ; D.C., 206 F.Supp. 370 ; Brown v. … McGinley, 366 U.S. 582 , 81 S.Ct. 1135 , 6 L.Ed.2d 551 ; Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 : and Gallagher v.

Chinatown Neighborhood Ass'n v. Harris

33 F. Supp. 3d 1085 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 25, 2014

Hamilton denied the motion, Chinatown Neighborhood Ass‘n v. Brown, No. 12-cv-3759 PJH, 2013 WL 60919 (N.D.Cal. … Jan. 2, 2013) {“Brown I”), and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed that decision on August 27, 2013, Chinatown Neighborhood Ass’n v. Brown, 539 Fed.Appx. 761 (9th Cir.2013) (“Brown II”).

The Board of Trustees v. Empire Engineering & Construction, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 7, 2024

Watts, 10 Cal. 4th at 749 n.5 3 (citation omitted); see Kott v. Super. Ct., 45 Cal. App. 4th 1126, 1137-38 (1996). … Code § 415.50(a)(1); Hernandez v. Srija, Inc., No. 19-1813-LB, 2019 WL 4417589, at 15 *2 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 2019); Cummings v. Brantley Hale, No. 15-cv-4723-JCS, 2016 WL 16 4762208, at *2 (N.D. Cal.

Jones

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 22, 2025

Clegg v. … Brown v. 6 || California Department of Corrections, 554 F.3d 747, 752 (9th Cir. 2009). 7 Jones’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. (Dkt.

Garrett v. Governing Board of Oakland Unified School District

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 4, 2022

Ashcroft v. … Groten v.