Case law

Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 18, 2024

David Savitz, MS, Ph.D., is a Professor of Epidemiology at Brown 6 University School of Public Health, a Professor of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology at Brown University Medical School … See, e.g., E.E.O.C. v. Farmer Bros.

Singh v. Stellantis N.V.

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 26, 2023

See Adoma v. Univ. of Phoenix, Inc., 711 10 F. Supp. 2d 1142, 1147-48 (E.D. Cal. 2010) (citing Ross v. U.S. Bank Nat. Ass’n, 542 F. … Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011). 1 Because all three factors have been satisfied and transfer to the District of Delaware is 2 || proper, the Court finds it appropriate to apply the first-to-file

Markt v. Ro-Mart, Inc.

471 F. Supp. 1292 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 1, 1979

National Labor Relations Board v. Hershey Foods Corp., 513 F.2d 1083 (9th Cir. 1975). … The parties agree that the four elements of estoppel are correctly set forth in Safway Steel Products, Inc. v.

United States v. Sidorenko

102 F. Supp. 3d 1124 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2015

In United States v. … In the relevant time period, Sidorenko was the Chairman of EDAPS's Advisory Council and effectively controlled EDAPS, and Vassiliev was EDAPS's Chairman of the Board. Id. ¶ 7-8. .

Hardwick v. US

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 19, 2020

See 7 Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008). 8 Here, the Tribe has failed to show irreparable harm threatened by a BIA decision. … Council v.

Ding, Ph.D. v. Structure Therapeutics, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 5, 2025

See Golston-Green v. City of 8 New York, 123 N.Y.S.3d 656, 670 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020); see also Mihalik v. Credit Agricole 9 Chevrequx N. … Diaz-Roa v.

Ford v. State of California

District Court, N.D. California · May 12, 2025

See United States v. … Ashcroft v.

Stemmelin v. Matterport, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 17, 2022

STEMMELIN, Case No. 20-cv-04168-WHA (TSH) 8 Plaintiff, DISCOVERY ORDER 9 v. … Pioneer Drive, LLC v. 13 Nissan Diesel America, Inc., 262 F.R.D. 552, 559-60 (D. Mont. 2009).

AbCellera Biologics Inc. v. Berkeley Lights, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 26, 2021

Defendant 20 states that it has timely filed three petitions for IPRs with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board 21 (“PTAB”) at the U.S. … Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1032, 1035 4 (N.D. Cal. 2015) (quoting Ethicon, Inc. v. Quigg, 849 F.2d 1422, 1426–27 (Fed.

Nichols v. Guidetoinsure, LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 15, 2024

Daimler AG v. … Dole Food Co., Inc. v.

California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Shiloh Group, LLC

268 F. Supp. 3d 1029 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 24, 2017

Exhibit U is the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board (“NCRWB”) Order No. … Council, Inc. v.

Montara Water & Sanitary District v. County of San Mateo

598 F. Supp. 2d 1070 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 26, 2009

The County refused, and on April 19, 2007, Montara’s board adopted a resolution authorizing eminent domain proceedings to obtain title to the property comprising the wells. … See 263.5 Acres of Land, 54 F.Supp. at 693 -94 (citing exclusively to In re Wilkey's Estate, 337 Pa. 129 , 10 A.2d 425 (1940), In re Board of Supervisors of Chenango County, 6 N.Y.S.2d 732 (N.Y.Co.Ct.1938), and State v.

Jacobsen v. Marin General Hospital

963 F. Supp. 866 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 16, 1997

Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 101-02 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); Fidelity Financial Corp. v. … Lyon v. United States, 843 F.Supp. 531, 536 (D.Minn.1994).

Cataphora Inc. v. Parker

848 F. Supp. 2d 1064 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 24, 2012

See Cabrales v. … post-judgment interest shall be governed as per section 1961(a), calculated “from the date of the entry of the judgment, at a rate equal to the weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board

In Re NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS LITIGATION

633 F. Supp. 2d 892 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 24, 2007

After AT&T and Verizon failed to comply with the request, VtDPS petitioned the Vermont Public Service Board (VtPSB) to open investigations of the carriers, Id. ¶¶ 33-34, and eventually ordered the carriers to respond. … Board of Commissioners, 276 Cal.App.2d 221 , 80 Cal.Rptr. 800 (1969) (invalidating a California Buy American statute because it had “more than ‘some incidental or indirect effect in foreign countries’ and * * * great potential

Brill v. Northern California Savings & Loan Ass'n

555 F. Supp. 566 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 7, 1982

In Cannon v. … See, e.g., Universities Research Ass’n v.

Barnes-Perrilliat v. South of Market Health Center

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 19, 2020

Huggins v. Longs 13 Drug Stores California, Inc., 6 Cal. 4th 124, 129 (1993); see Burgess v. … Janken v. GM Hughes Elect, 46 Cal.

Barker v. McFerran

District Court, N.D. California · May 6, 2024

Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 23 U.S. 820, 832 (1976); Sommatino v. United States, 255 F.3d 704, 707 (9th Cir. 2001) (citing 42 24 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c)); Leorna v. … See Faragher v.

P2I LTD. v. FAVORED TECH USA CORPORATION, et al.

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 10, 2025

The case proceeded as to the 4 remaining causes of action for both asserted patents. 5 Defendant Favored filed a petition for inter partes review at the Patent Trial and Appeal 6 Board (“PTAB … Web Techs., LLC v.

Mullins v. International Brotherhood Teamsters

District Court, N.D. California · May 23, 2025

at 26-27) (stating that “[c]ourts have reached different conclusions as to whether § 184 . 15 . . gives individual employees (and not just the union) the right to take a grievance to the 16 appropriate adjustment board … See Parker v. Cnty. of Riverside, No. 22 EDCV 21-1280 JGB (KKx), 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111195, at *6-7 (C.D. Cal.