Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.31s

  • United States v. Ailemen

    710 F. Supp. 2d 960 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 30, 2008

    See Mullins, 315 F.3d at 453 (“It cannot be permissible trial strategy, regardless of its merits otherwise, for counsel to override the ultimate decision of a defendant to testify contrary to his advice.”); Brown v. … Although claims of court interference should probably be treated as structural error (see Mullins, 315 F.3d at 452 (citing United States v. Brown, 217 F.3d 247, 258-59 (5th Cir.2000); United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Boriga v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 20, 2024

    Ashcroft v. 7 Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). … Co. v. Space 13 Sys.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Doe v. City Of Concord

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2022

    See Olsen v. … See Zucco Partners, LLC v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Guerra v. KIND, LLC

    District Court, N.D. California · May 11, 2023

    See Brown v. 19 Van’s Int’l Foods, Inc (“Van’s I”)., No. 22-CV-00001-WHO, 2022 WL 1471454, at *6 (N.D. … See Brown v. Van’s Int’l 7 Foods, Inc., No. 22-CV-00001-WHO, 2022 WL 3590333, at *4 (N.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 5, 2023

    See Brown v. Bank of Am., 26 N.A., 660 F. … By way of 23 example, Brown relied on Lerman v. Joyce Int’l, Inc., 10 F.3d 106 (3d Cir. 1993).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • White v. City of Richmond

    559 F. Supp. 127 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 8, 1982

    Builders, Inc. v. … Board of Education of Memphis City Schools, 611 F.2d 624, 636-37 (6th Cir.1979); Gagne v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Raya v. Maryatt Industries

    829 F. Supp. 1169 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 26, 1993

    In Bradley v. … Richmond School Board, 416 U.S. 696, 711 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2016 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974), the Court held that “a court is to apply the law in effect at the time it renders its decision, unless doing so would result in manifest

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Alexander Capital Ventures, LLC v. Bolt Financial Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 6, 2026

    See Davis v. … See Lectrodryer v. SeoulBank, 16 77 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Elkins v. Novato Police Department

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 4, 2022

    Lopez v. … No. 47 at 6 (Order Granting MTD FAC) 19 (quoting Board of County Comr's of Bryan County, Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Malloy v. Regents of the University of California

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 6, 2020

    M.M. v. Lafayette Sch. 16|| Dist., 681 F.3d 1082, 1091 (9th Cir. 2012) (citing Adams v. Cal. Dep’t of Health Servs., 17|| 487 F.3d 684, 688-89 (9th Cir. 2007)). … Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n.2 7 (9th Cir. 1995).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wright v. Enomoto

    462 F. Supp. 397 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 21, 1978

    See Spain v. Procunier, 408 F.Supp. 534 (N.D.Cal.1976); Clutchette v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 481-82 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 , 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972).

    Cited 98 timesPublished
  • Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Ass'n v. Secretary of Commerce

    494 F. Supp. 626 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 4, 1980

    See NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 292 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965). … Arnett v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Navarro-Aispura v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    842 F. Supp. 392 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 6, 1993

    Petitioner seeks habeas corpus review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ [“BIA”] order of exclusion. On November 24, 1993, the Court heard respondent’s motion for summary judgment. Alberto E. … I.N.S. v. Elias Zacarias, -U.S.-,-, 112 S.Ct. 812, 815 , 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992); Desir v. Ilchert, 840 F.2d 723, 726 (9th Cir.1988). Respondent argues that the substantial evidence standard should apply in this instance.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kinzli v. City of Santa Cruz

    620 F. Supp. 609 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 29, 1985

    State Board of Equalization, 22 Cal.3d 208, 245-46 , 149 Cal.Rptr. 239 , 583 P.2d 1281 (1978). There is sufficient room on the face of the ordinance to allow for interpretation. … Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982)).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Perry v. Watts

    520 F. Supp. 550 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 17, 1981

    In People v. … U.S. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Pinterest, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 9, 2021

    No. 56 (“SAC”) at ¶ 12. 21 Defendant is an online platform that allows users to create their own virtual image boards or 22 “boards,” by “pinning” images to their boards. See id. at ¶¶ 2, 23. … Ashcroft v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Tom Yum

    64 F. 485 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 15, 1894

    Martin v. Mott, 12 Wheat. 19, 31 ; Railroad Co. v. Stimpson, 14 Pet. 448 . 458; Benson v McMahon, 127 U. S. 457 , 8 Sup. Ct. 1240; In re Luis Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330 , 10 Sup. Ct. 1031. … Murray v. Improvement Co., 18 How. 272 ; Hilton v. Merritt, 110 U. S. 97 , 3 Sup. Ct. 548.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carter v. Spiegel

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 11, 2022

    See Roberts, 217 Cal. 15 App. 4th at 833; Frog Creek Partners, LLC v. Vance Brown, Inc., 206 Cal. App. 4th 515, 531 16 (2012). … See Turner v. Schultz, 175 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cub Club Investment, LLC v. Apple, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 16, 2022

    Rentmeester v. Nike, Inc., 883 F.3d 1111, 1117 (9th Cir. 2018), overruled on other grounds by Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin, 952 F.3d 1051 (9th Cir. 2020). … And the range of colors that could be chosen is similarly narrow—only realistic skin colors (hues of brown, black, and beige, rather than purple or blue) fall within the scope of the idea.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kokkoros

    District Court, N.D. California · May 1, 2026

    See Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 20 127 (2014); see also Brown v. … Brown 12 v. Lockheed Martin Corp., 814 F.3d 619, 627 (2d Cir. 2016).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.