Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.70s

  • Simulados Software, Ltd. v. Photon Infotech Private, Ltd.

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 4, 2020

    Brown Bark III, L.P. v. Haver, 219 Cal. 21 App. 4th 809, 821 (2013) (alterations in original). 22 III. Discussion 23 a. … Exxess 11 Electronixx v. Heger Realty Corp., 64 Cal. App. 4th 698, 708-09 (1998) (citing Santisas v. 12 Goodin, 17 Cal. 4th 599, 608 (1998)); see also Brown Bark III, 219 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ayers v. Burton

    District Court, N.D. California · May 20, 2022

    In Swarthout v. … Pearson, 639 F.3d at 1191; Roberts v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bolgaev v. City and County of San Francisco

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 2, 2020

    See Edwards v. … a M4 AUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRO 15 Senior United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ward v. Goossen

    71 F. Supp. 3d 1010 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 15, 2014

    Chiron Corp. v. Ortho Diagnostic Sys., Inc., 207 F.3d 1126, 1130 (9th Cir.2000). … (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); Volt Information Sciences Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Columbia Insurance Co. v. Simpson Strong-Tie Company Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 12, 2024

    Simpson now moves to stay these 18 proceedings pending a post-grant review (PGR) institution decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal 19 Board (PTAB) regarding the ‘339 patent. … Ethicon, Inc. v. Quigg, 849 F.2d 1422, 1426–27 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hickson v. Broomfield

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 2023

    Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S. 521, 533-34 (2011) (quoting Wilkinson v. 14 Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 82 (2005)); Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973). … Thornton v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Starkes v. Greene

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 17, 2024

    Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). “The ‘paradigm’ for 1 Anchor Semiconductor, Inc., 20-cv-06846-EJD, 2021 WL 3037701, at *7 (N.D. Cal. … See Sinatra v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Stafford v. Matteson

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 2020

    Petitioner challenges a decision by the Board of Parole Z 18 Hearings. … See Habeas 20 L.R. 2254-3(b)(2); see also Dunne v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Schaulis v. CTB/McGraw-Hill, Inc.

    496 F. Supp. 666 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 15, 1980

    Board of Trustees v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24, 25 , 99 S.Ct. 295, 296 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978); Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 577-78 , 98 S.Ct. 2943, 2949-2950 , 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978). See also Lim v. … Neutral application of an across-the-board policy does not constitute discrimination; it constitutes equal treatment. See Chavez, supra, 565 F.2d at 1094-95.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Evans v. Bloomfield

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 23, 2021

    Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1 counted as strikes for section 1915(g) purposes. See id. … Plaintiff is now given notice that the Court 17 believes the following federal district court dismissals may be counted as dismissals for purposes 18 of section 1915(g): (1) Evans v. Brown, et al., No.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Columbia Export Terminal, LLC v. ILWU-PMA Pension Fund

    District Court, N.D. California · May 16, 2023

    Lazy Y Ranch LTD v. … See, e.g., 16 McCleskey v. DLF Const., Inc., 689 F.3d 677, 679 (7th Cir. 2012); Board of Trustees of the Sign 17 pictorial and Display Indus. Welfare and Pension Trust Funds v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • New York City Employees' Retirement System v. Berry

    616 F. Supp. 2d 987 · District Court, N.D. California · May 15, 2009

    To implement this backdating scheme, Juniper used two Stock Option Plans, both of which provided that the exercise price of a stock option would be set by the Board of Directors or a Board-designated committee. … Nelson v. Serwold, 576 F.2d 1332, 1337 (9th Cir.1978).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Public Utilities Commission of Cal.

    141 F. Supp. 168 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 30, 1956

    On the contrary, in Panitz v. … In McCulloch v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. United States

    289 F. Supp. 126 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 1968

    C. v. Jersey City, 322 U.S. 503 , 512, 64 S.Ct. 1129 , 88 L.Ed. 1420 (1944); Waite v. United States, 161 F.Supp. 856, 860 (W.D.Pa.1958). … Co. v. United States, 279 F.Supp. 316, 351 (S.D.N.Y.1967).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States of America v. Sutter Health

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 18, 2021

    , 22 Stanford University, the Board of Trustees of Stanford University, and Does 1–10. … , 25 Stanford University, the Board of Trustees of Stanford University, and Does 1–10.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Martinez v. Napa State Hospital

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 20, 2024

    Dworkin v. … Ct., 42 Cal. 23 4th 730, 741-42 (2007) -- requires a person to present her claim to the California Victim 24 Compensation and Government Claims Board (“Board”) before she may file an action for damages

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Raquel Chavez v. WYNAR

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 8, 2019

    Between March 2013 and December 2015, Life Savers 6 assigned all of its acquired rights to Larry Brown (“Brown”). Id. ¶¶ 4, 5. … Wynar 2 became irate when Wynar learned that Brown had contacted Rito. Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ginochio v. Surgikos, Inc.

    864 F. Supp. 948 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 22, 1994

    Brown v. Medtronic, Inc., 852 F.Supp. 717, 721 (S.D.Ind.1994); Murray v. Medtronic, Inc., No. 93-1196, (minute entry) 1993 WL 515741 , 1993 U.S.Dist. Lexis 17476 (E.D.Lou. Dec. 2, 1993). … In Reiter v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Dizdar

    District Court, N.D. California · Jan 20, 2021

    Hearst v. West, 31 F. App’x 366, 368 (9th Cir. 2002). 13 Plaintiff has failed to show good cause. … See, e.g., Sebastian Brown Prods., LLC v. Muzooka, Inc., 143 F. Supp. 3d 1026, 5 1036 (N.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Chapman v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.

    456 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 1, 1978

    Export Ass’n. v. … EEOC v. Datapoint, 412 F.Supp. 406 (W.D.Tex.1976); Sabala v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.