Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
1.70s
Simulados Software, Ltd. v. Photon Infotech Private, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California · Jun 4, 2020
Brown Bark III, L.P. v. Haver, 219 Cal. 21 App. 4th 809, 821 (2013) (alterations in original). 22 III. Discussion 23 a. … Exxess 11 Electronixx v. Heger Realty Corp., 64 Cal. App. 4th 698, 708-09 (1998) (citing Santisas v. 12 Goodin, 17 Cal. 4th 599, 608 (1998)); see also Brown Bark III, 219 Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · May 20, 2022
In Swarthout v. … Pearson, 639 F.3d at 1191; Roberts v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBolgaev v. City and County of San Francisco
District Court, N.D. California · Jun 2, 2020
See Edwards v. … a M4 AUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRO 15 Senior United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Cited 0 timesUnknown71 F. Supp. 3d 1010 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 15, 2014
Chiron Corp. v. Ortho Diagnostic Sys., Inc., 207 F.3d 1126, 1130 (9th Cir.2000). … (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); Volt Information Sciences Inc. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedColumbia Insurance Co. v. Simpson Strong-Tie Company Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Nov 12, 2024
Simpson now moves to stay these 18 proceedings pending a post-grant review (PGR) institution decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal 19 Board (PTAB) regarding the ‘339 patent. … Ethicon, Inc. v. Quigg, 849 F.2d 1422, 1426–27 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 2023
Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S. 521, 533-34 (2011) (quoting Wilkinson v. 14 Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 82 (2005)); Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973). … Thornton v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Sep 17, 2024
Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). “The ‘paradigm’ for 1 Anchor Semiconductor, Inc., 20-cv-06846-EJD, 2021 WL 3037701, at *7 (N.D. Cal. … See Sinatra v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 2020
Petitioner challenges a decision by the Board of Parole Z 18 Hearings. … See Habeas 20 L.R. 2254-3(b)(2); see also Dunne v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSchaulis v. CTB/McGraw-Hill, Inc.
496 F. Supp. 666 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 15, 1980
Board of Trustees v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24, 25 , 99 S.Ct. 295, 296 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978); Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 577-78 , 98 S.Ct. 2943, 2949-2950 , 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978). See also Lim v. … Neutral application of an across-the-board policy does not constitute discrimination; it constitutes equal treatment. See Chavez, supra, 565 F.2d at 1094-95.
Cited 26 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jul 23, 2021
Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1 counted as strikes for section 1915(g) purposes. See id. … Plaintiff is now given notice that the Court 17 believes the following federal district court dismissals may be counted as dismissals for purposes 18 of section 1915(g): (1) Evans v. Brown, et al., No.
Cited 0 timesUnknownColumbia Export Terminal, LLC v. ILWU-PMA Pension Fund
District Court, N.D. California · May 16, 2023
Lazy Y Ranch LTD v. … See, e.g., 16 McCleskey v. DLF Const., Inc., 689 F.3d 677, 679 (7th Cir. 2012); Board of Trustees of the Sign 17 pictorial and Display Indus. Welfare and Pension Trust Funds v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNew York City Employees' Retirement System v. Berry
616 F. Supp. 2d 987 · District Court, N.D. California · May 15, 2009
To implement this backdating scheme, Juniper used two Stock Option Plans, both of which provided that the exercise price of a stock option would be set by the Board of Directors or a Board-designated committee. … Nelson v. Serwold, 576 F.2d 1332, 1337 (9th Cir.1978).
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States v. Public Utilities Commission of Cal.
141 F. Supp. 168 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 30, 1956
On the contrary, in Panitz v. … In McCulloch v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedConsolidated Freightways Corp. v. United States
289 F. Supp. 126 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 1968
C. v. Jersey City, 322 U.S. 503 , 512, 64 S.Ct. 1129 , 88 L.Ed. 1420 (1944); Waite v. United States, 161 F.Supp. 856, 860 (W.D.Pa.1958). … Co. v. United States, 279 F.Supp. 316, 351 (S.D.N.Y.1967).
Cited 4 timesPublishedUnited States of America v. Sutter Health
District Court, N.D. California · Aug 18, 2021
, 22 Stanford University, the Board of Trustees of Stanford University, and Does 1–10. … , 25 Stanford University, the Board of Trustees of Stanford University, and Does 1–10.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMartinez v. Napa State Hospital
District Court, N.D. California · Jun 20, 2024
Dworkin v. … Ct., 42 Cal. 23 4th 730, 741-42 (2007) -- requires a person to present her claim to the California Victim 24 Compensation and Government Claims Board (“Board”) before she may file an action for damages
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Nov 8, 2019
Between March 2013 and December 2015, Life Savers 6 assigned all of its acquired rights to Larry Brown (“Brown”). Id. ¶¶ 4, 5. … Wynar 2 became irate when Wynar learned that Brown had contacted Rito. Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknown864 F. Supp. 948 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 22, 1994
Brown v. Medtronic, Inc., 852 F.Supp. 717, 721 (S.D.Ind.1994); Murray v. Medtronic, Inc., No. 93-1196, (minute entry) 1993 WL 515741 , 1993 U.S.Dist. Lexis 17476 (E.D.Lou. Dec. 2, 1993). … In Reiter v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jan 20, 2021
Hearst v. West, 31 F. App’x 366, 368 (9th Cir. 2002). 13 Plaintiff has failed to show good cause. … See, e.g., Sebastian Brown Prods., LLC v. Muzooka, Inc., 143 F. Supp. 3d 1026, 5 1036 (N.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownChapman v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
456 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 1, 1978
Export Ass’n. v. … EEOC v. Datapoint, 412 F.Supp. 406 (W.D.Tex.1976); Sabala v.
Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna