Case law

Browning v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 16, 2021

Browning, Mr. and Ms. Wescott, Mr. Yong, and Mr. … Davidson v.

Gore v. Newsom

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 22, 2021

Ashcroft v. … Thornton v.

Bolukgiray

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 3, 2026

See Chairez v. … In Hassan v.

United States v. Shates

915 F. Supp. 1483 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 5, 1995

In United States v. … See, United States v.

Waters v. Heublein, Inc.

485 F. Supp. 110 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 9, 1979

See, e. g., Prandini v. National Tea Co., 585 F.2d 47, 53-54 (3rd Cir. 1978); Stanford Daily v. … See generally, Social Security Board v. Nierotko, 327 U.S. 358 , 66 S.Ct. 637 , 90 L.Ed. 718 (1946); Rev.Rul. 341, 1972- 2 C.B. 32 ; Rev.Rul. 55, 1957- 1 C.B. 304 , amplified in Rev.Rul. 64, 1975- 1 C.B. 16 .

Kirola v. City of San Francisco

74 F. Supp. 3d 1187 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 26, 2014

CLASS ACTION FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, United States District Judge I. … Access Board published Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way, thus implying that the Board intended the current guidelines to be limited to newly constructed buildings and

Anthony C. Lustig v. AzGen Scientific Holdings PLC

District Court, N.D. California · May 21, 2020

Roth v. … S.E.C. v.

Worrell v. Uniforms To You & Co.

655 F. Supp. 246 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 27, 1987

In Zipes v. … Nor does Malone v.

Conroy v. Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc.

325 F. Supp. 2d 1049 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 8, 2004

Meyers, 143 F.Supp.2d at 1048-49 ; see also, Board of Trustees of Teachers’ Retirement Sys., of State of Illinois v. Worldcom, Inc., 244 F.Supp.2d 900, 903 (N.D.Ill.2002). … See Coker v.

Aguilar v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 17, 2021

See O’Sullivan v. … See ° id.; Brown v. Maass, 11 F.3d 914, 915 (9th Cir. 1993). ° If available state remedies have not been exhausted as to all claims, the district court must ’ dismiss the petition. Rose v.

Brockman v. City of Monterey

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 19, 2020

The officers then spoke with a resident of 22 11 Portola named John Brown, who reported having heard no gunshots that day. … . ¶ 28. 12 John Brown told the officers that Todd Brockman lived at 30 Portola Avenue. Id.

Fibrogen, Inc. v. Hangzhou Andao Pharmaceutical LTD.

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 20, 2024

Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters 10 v. NASA Servs., Inc., 957 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir. 2020); see Jacobs v. Freeman, 104 Cal. … as from time to time 20 requested by said Board, resubmit for approval a detailed statement thereof.”

East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Biden

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 23, 2023

Proposed amici are a group of former 3 15 || immigration judges and former members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, ECF No. 172, and a 16 || National Citizenship and Immigration Services Council 119, ECF No. … Miller- 20 Wohl Co., Inc. v. Comm’r of Lab. and Indus. State of Mont., 694 F.2d 203, 204 (9th Cir. 1982). 21 Accordingly, the Court grants both motions for leave to file.

Wescott v. Beresford Corporation

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 8, 2022

Manning v. City of Rohnert Park, No. 5 C 06-03435 SBA, 2007 WL 1140434, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2007); see also Brown v. County 6 of Kern, No. 1:06-CV-00121OWWTAG, 2008 WL 544565, at *17 (E.D. Cal. … See Chrysler Corp. 17 v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 316 (1979).

Columbia Export Terminal, LLC v. ILWU-PMA Pension Fund

District Court, N.D. California · May 16, 2023

Lazy Y Ranch LTD v. … See, e.g., 16 McCleskey v. DLF Const., Inc., 689 F.3d 677, 679 (7th Cir. 2012); Board of Trustees of the Sign 17 pictorial and Display Indus. Welfare and Pension Trust Funds v.

Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. United States

289 F. Supp. 126 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 1968

C. v. Jersey City, 322 U.S. 503 , 512, 64 S.Ct. 1129 , 88 L.Ed. 1420 (1944); Waite v. United States, 161 F.Supp. 856, 860 (W.D.Pa.1958). … Co. v. United States, 279 F.Supp. 316, 351 (S.D.N.Y.1967).

Kaiser

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 9, 2025

However, Rodriguez Diaz v. … Denial is without prejudice to re-raising the issue if the government takes the position that no material change in circumstances is required or if the Board of Immigration Appeals overturns Matter of Sugay, 17 I. & N.

D.J. v. Walnut Creek School District

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 6, 2025

Mark H. v. … Wanamaker v.

United States v. Public Utilities Commission of Cal.

141 F. Supp. 168 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 30, 1956

On the contrary, in Panitz v. … In McCulloch v.

Fiuza

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 5, 2026

ECF No. 24 at 13 (quoting Robinson v. Board of Regents of the University of 7 || Colorado, 390 F. Supp. 2d at 1020-23 (D. … Khoja v. 2A Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc., 899 F.3d 988, 998 (9th Cir. 2018).