Case law

Security People, Inc. v. Medeco Security Locks, Inc.

59 F. Supp. 2d 1040 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 8, 1999

Dillon v. Board of Pension, 18 Cal.2d 427, 430 , 116 P.2d 37 (1941). SPI relies on cases which involved installment contracts. But the 1989 non-disclosure agreement is not analogous to an installment contract. … Kamilche Co., v. United States, 53 F.3d 1059, 1062 (9th Cir.1995).

Gusman v. County of San Mateo

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 25, 2021

DiCampli-Mintz v. … Driscoll v.

VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel Corporation

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 7, 2023

Kamakana v. City & Cty. Of 22 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 23 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). … (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. 25 Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)).

Riley v. Quantumscape Corp.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 15, 2023

Brown Bark III, L.P. v. … Camacho v.

City of S.F. v. Sessions

372 F. Supp. 3d 928 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 4, 2019

See Murphy v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Valoff , 422 F.3d 926 , 933 n.9 (9th Cir. 2005) (taking judicial notice of government administrative bulletin); Fed. R. Evid. 201(b).

Sadozai v. Defense Language Institute

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 7, 2021

.”); Munshower v. City of Lodi, 2016 WL 6875905, at *2 (E.D. Cal. … See Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 835 (1976). 21 Title VII and tort claims against federal employees can only be brought in federal court. 22 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1); Bullock v.

Aguilar v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 17, 2021

See O’Sullivan v. … See ° id.; Brown v. Maass, 11 F.3d 914, 915 (9th Cir. 1993). ° If available state remedies have not been exhausted as to all claims, the district court must ’ dismiss the petition. Rose v.

Mendoza v.City of San Jose

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 17, 2020

Brown v. 26 Stored Value Cards, Inc., 953 F.3d 567, 574 (9th Cir. 2020) (quoting Moss v. U.S. Secret Serv., 27 572 F.3d 962, 972 (9th Cir. 2009)) (internal citation omitted). … Desertrain v. City of Los Angeles, 754 F.3d 1147, 1154 (9th Cir. 2014) (quoting 3 Johnson v. Buckley, 356 F.3d 1067, 1077 (9th Cir. 2004)).

Browning v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 16, 2021

Browning, Mr. and Ms. Wescott, Mr. Yong, and Mr. … Davidson v.

Bolukgiray

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 3, 2026

See Chairez v. … In Hassan v.

United States v. Shates

915 F. Supp. 1483 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 5, 1995

In United States v. … See, United States v.

Waters v. Heublein, Inc.

485 F. Supp. 110 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 9, 1979

See, e. g., Prandini v. National Tea Co., 585 F.2d 47, 53-54 (3rd Cir. 1978); Stanford Daily v. … See generally, Social Security Board v. Nierotko, 327 U.S. 358 , 66 S.Ct. 637 , 90 L.Ed. 718 (1946); Rev.Rul. 341, 1972- 2 C.B. 32 ; Rev.Rul. 55, 1957- 1 C.B. 304 , amplified in Rev.Rul. 64, 1975- 1 C.B. 16 .

Sullivan v. Chase Investment Services of Boston, Inc.

434 F. Supp. 171 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 25, 1977

. § 79z(b)); Brown v. Bullock, 194 F.Supp. 207, 225-226 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d en banc, 294 F.2d 415 (2 Cir. 1961) (§ 47(b) of Investment Company Act, 15 U.S.C. § 80a-46(b)); Kardon v. … In Brown v. Bullock, 294 F.2d 415, 421-22 (2 Cir. 1961) (en banc), the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit disagreed with the holding in Brouk as to the Investment Company Act.

Brockman v. City of Monterey

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 19, 2020

The officers then spoke with a resident of 22 11 Portola named John Brown, who reported having heard no gunshots that day. … . ¶ 28. 12 John Brown told the officers that Todd Brockman lived at 30 Portola Avenue. Id.

Kirola v. City of San Francisco

74 F. Supp. 3d 1187 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 26, 2014

CLASS ACTION FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, United States District Judge I. … Access Board published Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way, thus implying that the Board intended the current guidelines to be limited to newly constructed buildings and

Drevaleva v. Alameda Health System

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 7, 2022

V. Scanlon, 17 473 U.S. 234, 237–38 (1985). Eleventh Amendment immunity extends to suits against a state 18 agency. See Brown v. Cal. … Dep’t of Corrs., 554 F.3d 747, 725 (9th Cir. 2009) (California 19 Department of Corrections and California Board of Prison Terms entitled to Eleventh Amendment 20 immunity).

Payton

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 1, 2026

board member] it had elected not 10 to repurchase the unvested shares”). … Exchange v. 21 Zerin, 53 Cal.

Conroy v. Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc.

325 F. Supp. 2d 1049 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 8, 2004

Meyers, 143 F.Supp.2d at 1048-49 ; see also, Board of Trustees of Teachers’ Retirement Sys., of State of Illinois v. Worldcom, Inc., 244 F.Supp.2d 900, 903 (N.D.Ill.2002). … See Coker v.

The VPS Companies, Inc. v. Arch Specialty Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. California · May 1, 2025

Galen v. … Sharing executive officers or board 22 members, as it appears VPS and CSS do, also “does not mean that these entities’ interests 23 were interchangeable.” Mid-Century Ins. Co. v. AMCO Ins.

East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Biden

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 23, 2023

Proposed amici are a group of former 3 15 || immigration judges and former members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, ECF No. 172, and a 16 || National Citizenship and Immigration Services Council 119, ECF No. … Miller- 20 Wohl Co., Inc. v. Comm’r of Lab. and Indus. State of Mont., 694 F.2d 203, 204 (9th Cir. 1982). 21 Accordingly, the Court grants both motions for leave to file.