Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.09s

  • AM Trust v. UBS AG

    78 F. Supp. 3d 977 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 29, 2015

    Daimler AG v. Bauman, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 746, 751 , 187 L.Ed.2d 624 (2014) (citing Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. … Brown, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2846, 2851 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011)); see Int’l Shoe, 326 U.S. at 316-20 , 66 S.Ct. 154 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Playground AI LLC v. Mighty Computing, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2024

    Conservation Force 4 v. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 7 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Allen v. United States

    52 F. 575 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 1892

    A drawback of seventy-five cents per ton shall be allowed on all bituminous coal imported into the United States which is afterwards used for fuel on board of vessels propelled by steam which are engaged in the coasting trade … Law,- § 72; Thornley v. U. S., 113 U. S. 313 , 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 491. The laws existing at the time of the passage of the act of October 1, 1890, allowing drawbacks, were not uniform.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. v. Victor

    43 F. Supp. 3d 1026 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 28, 2014

    Dkt. 39 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIMS SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, United States District Judge Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. … Folgelstrom v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Lawrence v. City & County of San Francisco

    258 F. Supp. 3d 977 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 15, 2017

    Block v. … (quoting Board of Cty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997))).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Moss v. Infinity Insurance Co.

    197 F. Supp. 3d 1191 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 14, 2016

    See Moore v. … Lindsey Mor-den Claims Servs., Inc., 72 Cal.App.4th 249, 254 , 84 Cal.Rptr.2d 799 (1999) (“negligence is not among the theories of recovery generally available against insurers”) (emphasis in original); Brown v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Barno v. Padilla

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 6, 2020

    See West v. … Ct., 42 Cal. 4th 730, 741-42 (Cal. 2007) -- requires a person to present his claim to 25 the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board (“Board”) before he may file 26 an action for damages against a

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Levin v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America

    33 F. Supp. 2d 1179 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 27, 1998

    Gibson v. Prudential Ins. … In re Witwer, 148 B.R. 930, 935 (citing the Sure-Tan, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 467 U.S. 883, 891 , 104 S.Ct. 2803 , 81 L.Ed.2d 732 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Siegel v. Regents of the University of California

    308 F. Supp. 832 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 19, 1970

    Esteban v. Central Missouri State College, 415 F.2d 1077 (8th Cir. 1969); Jones v. … Plaintiff also relies largely on Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, supra; Burnside v. Byars, 363 F.2d 744 (5th Cir. 1966), and Dickey v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Langlois v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

    833 F. Supp. 2d 1182 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 2011

    Rodrigo Munoz, a board certified psychiatrist and neurologist. Langlois Decl. ¶ 20; AR 603. On January 8, 2010, plaintiff went to urgent care at Metro Comprehensive Medical Center after experiencing heart palpitations. … Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Huffman v. Fiola

    850 F. Supp. 833 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 6, 1994

    See Rizzo v. … Vaughn v. Trotter, 516 F.Supp. 886, 894 (M.D.Tenn.1980) (citing Mt. Healthy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977)).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Anderson Power Products, Inc. v. Bizlink Technology, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 12, 2025

    ECF 59. 5 On November 24, 2024, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) issued its Decision 6 Granting Inter Partes Review of claims 1-4 and 7-12 of the ’017 patent. … statement shall apprise the Court of the 24 PTAB’s decision and describe the parties’ respective positions regarding whether the stay should 25 continue in light of the remaining steps before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. Four M's Construction & Backhoe, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 23, 2024

    Operating Eng’rs Pension Trust v. … Adm’rs, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fowler v. Aetna Life Insurance

    615 F. Supp. 2d 1130 · District Court, N.D. California · May 15, 2009

    Lawrence Blumberg, who is board certified in orthopedic surgery. On November 28, 2007, based on a document review only, Dr. … Abatie v. Alta Health Insurance Co., 458 F.3d 955, 959 (9th Cir.2006). While this decision pre-dated Glenn , this aspect of earlier Ninth Circuit law still seems to be viable. See Nolan v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re Clear Lake Beach Co.

    12 F. Supp. 250 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 9, 1935

    Haugeberg v. Clear Lake Beach Company, a copartnership composed of R. J. Palmer and L. M. … Y. v. Lewis State Bank (C. C. A.) 58 F.(2d) 559, 560 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re Lyft Inc. Securities Litigation

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 20, 2021

    Zinser v. … Valentino v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Smith v. Medtronic, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 28, 2023

    Brown v. Superior Court, 44 Cal. 3d 16 1049, 1056 (1988). Rather, the burden of proof is eased under a under strict liability theory. … See Brown¸ 44 Cal. 3d at 1061 (“It is 27 well established that a manufacturer fulfills its duty to warn if it provides adequate warning to the 1 negligence theories. See Zetz v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • D.J. v. Walnut Creek School District

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 6, 2025

    Mark H. v. … Wanamaker v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Schaulis v. CTB/McGraw-Hill, Inc.

    496 F. Supp. 666 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 15, 1980

    Board of Trustees v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24, 25 , 99 S.Ct. 295, 296 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978); Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 577-78 , 98 S.Ct. 2943, 2949-2950 , 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978). See also Lim v. … Neutral application of an across-the-board policy does not constitute discrimination; it constitutes equal treatment. See Chavez, supra, 565 F.2d at 1094-95.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Gusman v. County of San Mateo

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 25, 2021

    DiCampli-Mintz v. … Driscoll v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.