Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

0.57s

  • Daniels

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 20, 2026

    Apr. 2, 2015) (awarding 2 $375,000 in fees where plaintiffs filed a complaint that ultimately brought defendant’s transaction 3 into legal compliance); Hr’g Tr. at 33-34, 39, Browne v. Layfield, C.A. … Feuer v. 25 Thompson, No. 10-cv-00279-YGR, 2013 WL 2950667 at *4 (N.D. Cal. June 14, 2013).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Barno v. Padilla

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 6, 2020

    See West v. … Ct., 42 Cal. 4th 730, 741-42 (Cal. 2007) -- requires a person to present his claim to 25 the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board (“Board”) before he may file 26 an action for damages against a

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rivera Giorges v. Kaiser

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 10, 2025

    See Acord v. … Demore v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Avenmarg v. Humboldt County

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 29, 2020

    See Board of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 24 691. … Lane v. Franks, 573 U.S. 228, 231 (2014) 25 (quoting Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty., 391 U.S. 563, 26 568 (1968)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. 412.715 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.

    53 F. Supp. 143 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 13, 1943

    In Matthews v. … United States v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. Four M's Construction & Backhoe, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 23, 2024

    Operating Eng’rs Pension Trust v. … Adm’rs, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Paul

    244 F. Supp. 452 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 14, 1965

    After the decision in Paul v. … The state cites Parker v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jouan v. The Leland Stanford Junior University

    District Court, N.D. California · Nov 14, 2023

    Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL 10 DISMISSAL 11 Re: ECF 59 THE BOARD … See Kokkonen v. Guardian 22 || Life Ins. Co.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Achal v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.

    114 F. Supp. 3d 781 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 14, 2015

    Brown v. Lucky Stores, 246 F.3d 1182, 1188 (9th Cir.2001). Once aware, the employer has an affirmative duty to reasonably accommodate, which is not extinguished by one effort. Swanson v. Morongo Unified Sch. … Comm’n v.

    Cited 91 timesPublished
  • Sattar v. Unocal Corp.

    829 F. Supp. 331 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 12, 1993

    . § 2000e(i) as encompassing an administrative board. … See also Morgan v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Goodworth Holdings Inc. v. Suh

    239 F. Supp. 2d 947 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 20, 2002

    Lujan v. … Twomey v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • B.W.

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 17, 2026

    B.W. nonetheless 18 argues that there is a genuine dispute for trial on the issue of causation, id. at 25, which is a 19 necessary element of his sole claim for negligence, see Brown v. … Sanderson v. Int’l Flavors & Fragrances, Inc., 950 F. Supp. 981, 1002 (C.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Manufactured Home Communities, Inc. v. City of San Jose

    358 F. Supp. 2d 896 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 18, 2003

    MHC did not first seek determination by the Rental Dispute Board or state court that the subject mobilehome sites were exempt. (ComplA 77, 84.) … (See generally, Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board (1997) 16 Cal.4th 761, 770-772 , 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 672 , 941 P.2d 851 .) Id. at 2.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Dillingham Tug & Barge Corp. v. Collier Carbon & Chemical Corp.

    548 F. Supp. 691 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 11, 1981

    See, Creole Shipping v. Diamandis Pateras, 1977 AMC 189 , Navieros Oceanikos v. Mobile Trader, 1977 AMC 749 ; Hanover Ins. v. Puerto Rico Lighterage Co., 553 F.2d 728 ; Griffith v. … S. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • California Primary Care Association, et al. v. Shirley N Weber, PH.D., et al.

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 7, 2026

    to Defend Affirmative Action v. Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1133–34 (9th Cir. 2012). The latter are permitted under Ex parte Young. See Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 276–77 (1986). … See FDA v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wilson v. Kijakazi

    District Court, N.D. California · Dec 21, 2022

    Brown-Hunter v. 14 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492-93 (quoting Lingenfelter v. Astrue, 504 F.3d 1028, 1036 (9th 2 Cir. 2007)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Panuwat

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 8, 2024

    U.S. v. … Cal. 2009); Brown v. China Integrated Energy 4 Inc., 2014 WL 12576643, at *7-8 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2014); and Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Int’l 5 Pension Fund v. Credit Suisse Sec.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gusman v. County of San Mateo

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 25, 2021

    DiCampli-Mintz v. … Driscoll v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bratton v. Broomfield

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 25, 2023

    Plaintiff asserts that on 14 May 23, 2020, he had a parole board hearing during which an unidentified "board-member 15 “made a snide remark about an attack by gang Hispanic inmates on [Plaintiff] in 1994.” 16 Id … Estate of Clark v. Walker, 865 F.3d 544, 553 (7th Cir. 2017; Maney v. Brown, No. 16 6:20-cv-00570-SB, 2020 WL 7364977 at *5, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 235447 at *17 (D. 17 Or.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Clark v. Social Security Administration

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 27, 2023

    C 22-5557 JSC; Clark v. Ahern, et al., No. C 22-6171 JSC; Clark v. Board of Equalization, No. C 22-6169 JSC; Clark v. … C 22-6173 JSC; Clark v. Medical Board of California, et al., No. C 22-6174 JSC; Clark v. Commission on Judicial Performance, et al., No. C 22-6204 JSC; Clark v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.