Case law

Russo v. Federal Medical Services, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 5, 2025

Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 28 Cal. App. 5th 824, 19 836 (2018) (citations omitted). … v.

Hayer v. Liverant

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 22, 2022

HAYER, Case No. 22-cv-05420-VC Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. … Fellowship of Christian Athletes v. San Jose Unified School District Board of Education, 46 F.4th 1075, 1091 (9th Cir. 2022). Hayer has done at least this much.

Manasen v. California Dental Services

424 F. Supp. 657 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 4, 1976

Any such nonprofit corporation shall be subject to supervision by the particular professional board under which its members are licensed and shall also be subject to Section 9505.” 3 . … In People v.

U.A. Local No. 343 of the United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices v. Nor-Cal Plumbing, Inc.

797 F. Supp. 767 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 22, 1992

Seymour v. Hull & Moreland Engineering, 605 F.2d 1105, 1111 (9th Cir.1979). Although plaintiff need only establish injustice or fraudulent intent in addition to disregard of the corporate identity, Board of Trustees v. … Winterrowd v. David Freedman & Co., 724 F.2d 823, 826 (9th Cir.1984) (citations omitted); see also Cox v. Eichler, 765 F.Supp. 601 (N.D.Cal.1990); Kuntz v.

Daniels

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 20, 2026

Apr. 2, 2015) (awarding 2 $375,000 in fees where plaintiffs filed a complaint that ultimately brought defendant’s transaction 3 into legal compliance); Hr’g Tr. at 33-34, 39, Browne v. Layfield, C.A. … Feuer v. 25 Thompson, No. 10-cv-00279-YGR, 2013 WL 2950667 at *4 (N.D. Cal. June 14, 2013).

Taylor v. Martinez

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 28, 2022

Skinner v. Switzer, 562 U.S. 521, 533-34 (2011) 7 (quoting Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 82 (2005)); see Calderon v. Ashmus, 523 U.S. 8 740, 747 (1998); Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 648 (1997); Preiser v. … Thornton v. Brown, 757 F.3d 834, 841 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing 17 Preiser, 411 U.S. at 500).

Pierce

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 3, 2026

Fleming v. … if the Board is unable to reach 3 a majority decision and elects to send the matter to arbitration.

Rivera Giorges v. Kaiser

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 10, 2025

See Acord v. … Demore v.

Goodworth Holdings Inc. v. Suh

239 F. Supp. 2d 947 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 20, 2002

Lujan v. … Twomey v.

Avenmarg v. Humboldt County

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 29, 2020

See Board of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 24 691. … Lane v. Franks, 573 U.S. 228, 231 (2014) 25 (quoting Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty., 391 U.S. 563, 26 568 (1968)).

United States v. 412.715 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.

53 F. Supp. 143 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 13, 1943

In Matthews v. … United States v.

United States v. Paul

244 F. Supp. 452 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 14, 1965

After the decision in Paul v. … The state cites Parker v.

Dos Santos v. People of California

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 8, 2021

McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849, 856 (1994). … Thornton v.

Achal v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.

114 F. Supp. 3d 781 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 14, 2015

Brown v. Lucky Stores, 246 F.3d 1182, 1188 (9th Cir.2001). Once aware, the employer has an affirmative duty to reasonably accommodate, which is not extinguished by one effort. Swanson v. Morongo Unified Sch. … Comm’n v.

Sattar v. Unocal Corp.

829 F. Supp. 331 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 12, 1993

. § 2000e(i) as encompassing an administrative board. … See also Morgan v.

Nat'l Educ. Ass'n v. Devos

379 F. Supp. 3d 1001 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 26, 2019

O'Neill and Idaho Wool Growers Association v. … After deciding on its recommendation, the Board directly notified each almond handler of the proposed assessment rate. Id.

B.W.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 17, 2026

B.W. nonetheless 18 argues that there is a genuine dispute for trial on the issue of causation, id. at 25, which is a 19 necessary element of his sole claim for negligence, see Brown v. … Sanderson v. Int’l Flavors & Fragrances, Inc., 950 F. Supp. 981, 1002 (C.D.

MN Investment Inc. et.al. v. Nguyen

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 31, 2022

Nguyen because, as Amour’s sole 6 board member and the holder of every officer position in Amour, Mr. Nguyen was the “guiding 7 spirit” behind Amour’s acts. See, e.g., Matsunoki Grp., Inc. v. … Lou v.

Manufactured Home Communities, Inc. v. City of San Jose

358 F. Supp. 2d 896 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 18, 2003

MHC did not first seek determination by the Rental Dispute Board or state court that the subject mobilehome sites were exempt. (ComplA 77, 84.) … (See generally, Kavanau v. Santa Monica Rent Control Board (1997) 16 Cal.4th 761, 770-772 , 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 672 , 941 P.2d 851 .) Id. at 2.

California Primary Care Association, et al. v. Shirley N Weber, PH.D., et al.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 7, 2026

to Defend Affirmative Action v. Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1133–34 (9th Cir. 2012). The latter are permitted under Ex parte Young. See Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 276–77 (1986). … See FDA v.