Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.17s

  • Hawkins v. Zoegall

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 20, 2022

    See Bishop Creek Lodge v. Scira, 46 Cal. … See LiMandri v. 9 || Judkins, 52 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Altmann v. Television Signal Corp.

    849 F. Supp. 1335 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 1994

    Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board, 424 U.S. 507, 513 , 96 S.Ct. 1029, 1033 , 47 L.Ed.2d 196 (1976). The government’s general regulation of a private industry is not enough, in itself, to establish state action. … Viacom International, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 828 F.Supp. 741, 744 (N.D.Cal1993) (citing San Diego Committee v. Governing Board, 790 F.2d 1471 (9th Cir.1986)).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • R.C. v. Sussex Publishers, LLC

    District Court, N.D. California · Jun 23, 2025

    Tavernetti v. … For example, Defendant claims certain “facts” are undisputed and cites Brown v. 14 Google LLC, 685 F. Supp. 3d 909, 919 (N.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • OneBeacon Insurance v. Haas Industries, Inc.

    567 F. Supp. 2d 1138 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 11, 2008

    Spray-Tek, Inc. v. Robbins Motor Tramp., Inc., 426 F.Supp.2d 875, 883 (W.D.Wis.2006) (plaintiff was consignee as well as owner); Banos v. … See e.g., Hath v. Alleghany Color Corp., 369 F.Supp.2d 1116 (D.Ariz.2005); Schweitzer Aircraft Corp. v. Landstar Ranger, Inc., 114 F.Supp.2d 199 (W.D.N.Y.2000); Jackson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Diem v. City and County of San Francisco

    686 F. Supp. 806 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 8, 1988

    Padway v. … Counts IV, V, and VII — Title VII.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Acme Breweries v. Brannan

    109 F. Supp. 116 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 30, 1952

    In United States v. … Johnson Co. v. Securities & Exchange Comm., 2 Cir., 198 F.2d 690 , 693; Irwin v. Simmons, 2 Cir., *118 140 F.2d 558, 560 ; Andrews v. Com’r of Internal Revenue, 2 Cir., 135 F.2d. 314, 317 ; Hoffman v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Eden Environmental Citizen's Group, LLC v. American Custom Marble, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 13, 2020

    Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 373 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. 2004) (citing White 19 v. … Levitt v. Yelp!

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sillah

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 11, 2026

    See Perry v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 582 U.S. 420, 425–26 (2017). window. … Drevaleva v. Dep’t of Veterans Affs., 835 F. App’x 221, 223 (9th Cir. 2020); see also White v. Gen. Servs.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Berry v. Sonoma County

    791 F. Supp. 1395 · District Court, N.D. California · May 1, 1992

    Defendants are Sonoma County; Sonoma County Board of Supervisors; Richard Michaelson, Sonoma County Sheriff, and Janet Nicholas, James Harberson, Tim Smithy, Nick Esposti, and Ernest Carpenter, members of the Board of Supervisors … Co. v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Berry v. County of Sonoma, 30 F.3d 1174 (1994)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Lucasarts Entertainment Co. v. Humongous Entertainment Co.

    815 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 3, 1993

    See e.g., Johnson Controls, Inc. v. … Dow Jones & Co. v. Board of Trade, 546 F.Supp. 113, 117 (S.D.N.Y.1982); Marisa Christina, Inc. v. Bernard Chaus, Inc., 808 F.Supp. 356, 358 (S.D.N.Y.1992); Life Music, Inc. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co. v. United States

    115 F. Supp. 655 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 22, 1953

    The resolution of the board of directors of *658 Victoria Land Company specifically directed that “all the assets of said corporation, real and personal wherever situated and of whatever character, whether tangible or intangible … Co. v. U. S., 268 U.S. 271 , 45 S.Ct. 503 , 69 L.Ed. 951 ; Kingan & Co. Inc., v. U. S., 44 F.2d 447 , 71 Ct.Cl. 19 ; Consolidated Paper Co. v. U. S., 59 F.2d 281 , 75 Ct.Cl. 215 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • West Coast Construction Co. v. Oceano Sanitary District

    311 F. Supp. 378 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 8, 1970

    In Flast v. … Concedediy, the District Board of Directors could be forced into increasing the tax rate in order to meet the District’s financial obligations.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Shainwald v. Lewis

    69 F. 487 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 1895

    In Owings v. … In Shields v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Pacific Steel Group v. Commercial Metals Company

    District Court, N.D. California · Jul 3, 2024

    were then pending; 12 WHEREAS, on July 2, 2024, the Court directed the Parties to meet and confer and 13 reconsider their sealing requests in light of the “compelling reasons” standard under Kamakana v. … Brown (SBN 202545) Email: david.costigan@dechert.com Daniel McCuaig (pro hac vice) 9 Nathaniel D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Datagate, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

    672 F. Supp. 1288 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 31, 1987

    Barry, 805 F.2d at 871 (quoting NCAA v. Board of Regents 468 U.S. 85 , 109-10 n. 39, 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 2964 n. 39, 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984)). … Wilson Industries, Inc. v. Chronicle Broadcasting Co., 794 F.2d 1359, 1363 (9th Cir.1986) (quoting Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Ass’n v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Allan v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding

    730 F. Supp. 2d 1071 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 27, 2010

    See, e.g., Collins v. FMHAUSDA, 105 F.3d 1366, 1367-68 (11th Cir.1997); Urbina v. Homeview Lending Inc., 681 F.Supp.2d 1254, 1259 (D.Nev.2009); Bloom v. … See Brown v. Option One Mortg. Corp., No. C 09-5705 MHP, 2010 WL 1267774 , at *4 (N.D.Cal. Apr. 1, 2010) (Patel, J.). The court therefore declines to toll the statute of limitations on Allan’s RE SPA claim.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hernandez v. Kijakazi

    District Court, N.D. California · Dec 2, 2021

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492-93 (9th 1 findings are insufficient.” Id. at 493 (quoting Reddick v. Chater, 157 F.3d 715, 722 (9th 2 Cir. 1998)). … Robbins v. Soc. Sec.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Roe v. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 13, 2022

    Norcia v. Samsung Telecomms. America, LLC, 845 F.3d 1279, 1283 (9th Cir. 19 2017) (quotations and citations omitted). … See Craig v. 20 Brown & Root, Inc., 84 Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lorenz v. Safeway, Inc.

    241 F. Supp. 3d 1005 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 13, 2017

    Tibbie I, 729 F.3d at 1121 (quoting Brown v. Am. Life Holdings, Inc., 190 F.3d 856, 859 (8th Cir. 1999)). … Brown v. Owens Corning Inv.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Bynum v. City of Pittsburg

    622 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 27, 1985

    In Haygood v. … Rutledge v. Arizona Board of Regents, 660 F.2d 1345 (9th Cir.1981), aff'd on other grounds sub nom Kush v. Rutledge, 460 U.S. 719 , 103 S.Ct. 1483 , 75 L.Ed.2d 413 (1983).

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.