Case law

Coho Salmon v. Pacific Lumber Co.

61 F. Supp. 2d 1001 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 22, 1999

Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996) (quoting Warth, 422 U.S. at 511 , 95 S.Ct. 2197 ); Automobile Workers v. … Sierra Club v.

Blue Bottle Coffee, LLC v. Liao

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 16, 2023

See Bergen v. … Cooper v. Brown, 510 F.3d 870, 942 (9th Cir. 2007).

Hooker v. Atchley

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 22, 2022

Chades v. Hill, 976 F.3d 1055, 1056-57 (9th Cir. 2020). … Brown v. Muniz, 889 F.3d 661, 667 (9th Cir. 2018). In 2011, Hooker filed a habeas petition challenging the same 2008 Santa Clara criminal judgment that he challenges in this petition.

Starratt v. Fermented Sciences, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 2023

Brown v. Natures Path Foods, Inc., No. 21-CV-05132-HSG, 2022 WL 4 717816, at *6, n.15 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2022). … See Brown, 2022 WL 717816, at *6, n.15. 10 C.

Mitsui & Co. (USA), Inc. v. C&H Refinery, Inc.

492 F. Supp. 115 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 10, 1980

Cavac Companía Anonima Venezolana de Administracion y Comercio v. Board, 189 F.Supp. 205, 209 (S.D.N.Y.1960). However, they do not necessarily preclude a late stay. … This is illustrated vividly in Demsey & Assocs., Inc. v. S.S.

Hajro v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services

900 F. Supp. 2d 1034 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 15, 2012

See Rosenfeld v. … Brown, 805 F.Supp.2d 918, 921 (N.D.Cal.2011); Valdivia v. Brown, 848 F.Supp.2d 1141, 1143 (C.D.Cal.2011). . Cf. Hiken v. Dep’t of Defense, Case No. C 06-02812, 2012 WL 3686747 , at *5 (N.D.Cal.

Mou v. SSC San Jose Operating Company LP

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 22, 2019

Brown v. Hain Celestial Grp., Inc., 913 F. 3 Supp. 2d 881, 888 (N.D. Cal. 2012); see also Thorpe v. Abbott Labs., Inc., 534 F. Supp. 2d 1120, 4 1125 (N.D. Cal. 2008). … See Rees v.

Cabrera

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 25, 2026

West v. … Cal. 1997) (finding that 14 due process requires no more than notice and a post-deprivation grievance process); Torres v. 15 Brown, 2016 WL 524804, at *3 (E.D.

Kampe v. Volta Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 21, 2024

Corp. v. … Sys. v.

RUSSELL BY RUSSELL v. Jefferson School Dist.

609 F. Supp. 605 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 16, 1985

The scope of this court’s review under that section has been circumscribed by the United States Supreme Court in Board of Education v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 , 102 S.Ct. 3034 , 73 L.Ed.2d 690 (1982). … V. IT IS ORDERED that this matter is remanded to the defendant district, for the following proceedings to be conducted immediately: 1.

Betty Hussein-v-Marin General Hospital

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 9, 2025

Navarro v. … Plaintiff complains that going before the 13 Adjustment Board means there is no option of arbitration, but a party can still choose to either go 14 to the Adjustment Board or arbitration. (Pl.’s Opp’n at 1-2.)

Hill v. Workday, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 14, 2024

Brown believed she was having problems with her manager because of her race and inquired 8 about whether Ms. Brown might be interviewed for the open role. Id. … Brown, and Defendant 10 Hauck determined that Ms. Brown “would not be a good fit.” Id. Upon information and belief, Ms. 11 Brown’s employment with Workday ended shortly thereafter. Id.

Kevin Barry Fine Art Associates v. Ken Gangbar Studio, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 14, 2020

See Myers v. … Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. 9 v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011) (quoting Int’l Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316 10 (1945)) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Walden v.

B. v. City of Oakland

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 2021

Gov’t Code § 945.4; Harlow v. Cty. of Riverside, 295 F. … “The board 11 shall grant or deny the application within 45 days after it is presented to the board.” Cal. Gov’t 12 Code § 911.6(a).

Passantino v. Kilakazi

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 11, 2024

Brown-Hunter v. 20 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492.

McKinney v. Oakland Unified School District

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 1, 2020

See Romano v. … (Compl. ¶¶ 18-19, 20, 24); see Cabesuela v. Browning- 3 Ferris Industries of California, Inc., 68 Cal.

Gofron v. Picsel Technologies, Inc.

804 F. Supp. 2d 1030 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 25, 2011

Plaintiffs allege that Jabbar was the chairman of PTI’s board of directors and that Khand was an officer of the company. Jabbar denies that he was an officer, director or employee of PTI. … Hale v. Arizona, 967 F.2d 1356, 1363 (9th Cir.1992).

JMA Enterprises LLC v. Taylor

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 27, 2022

Clair v. City of Chico, 880 F.2d 199, 201 (9th Cir. 1989); see also 2 Savage v. Glendale Union High Sch. Dist. … Brown v. HTR 15 Props. LLC, No. 17-CV-00829-WHO, 2017 WL 3453354, at *2 (N.D. Cal.

Mental Health & Wellness Coalition v. Stanford University

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 29, 2019

Lewis v. Vision Value, LLC, Case No. 11-cv-01055-LJO, 2012 WL 2930867, 10 at *4 (E.D. Cal. July 18, 2012). … Richards v. Safeway, Inc. 2015 WL 163393, Case No. 13-cv-4317-JD at *2 (N.D. 17 Cal. Jan. 12, 2015).

Mazor v. Shelton

637 F. Supp. 330 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 18, 1986

Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632, 639-40 , 94 S.Ct. 791, 796 , 39 L.Ed.2d 52 (1974). … In Whelehan v.