Case law

Pham v. Board of Regents UCSF

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 2023

Saundra Brown Armstrong 26 concerning Dr. Song. See id. at 2:25-3:4. I also reviewed the deposition testimony of Drs. … Cal. 2009) (citing Mendiondo v. 22 Centinela Hosp. Med. Ctr., 521 F.3d 1097, 1105 (9th Cir. 2008)); see also Armin v. Riverside 23 Cmty. Hosp., 5 Cal. App. 5th 810, 830 (Cal. Ct.

Nolan v. Clelandq

482 F. Supp. 668 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 20, 1979

Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). Plaintiff’s other jurisdictional allegations must therefore be stricken. … Furthermore, Title VII is the exclusive remedy for discrimination in federal employment, Brown v. General Services Administration, supra, and employees must be held to the requirements of implementing regulations.

Pham v. Board of Regents UCSF

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 15, 2023

v. … Yanowitz v. 23 L’Oreal USA, Inc., 36 Cal. 4th 1028, 1054 (Cal. 2005); see also Light v. Dep’t of Parks & 24 Recreation, 14 Cal. App. 5th 75, 92 (Cal. Ct.

Hicks v. Board of Parole Hearings

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 21, 2022

14 BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, 15 … See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(2) (stating that a petition should be 25 heard in the district of confinement if it challenges the manner in which the sentence is 26 carried out); see also Tucker v.

Clark v. Medical Board of California

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 2023

C 22-4972 JSC; Clark v. Marin County District Attorney, et al., No. C 22-5557 JSC; Clark v. Board of 26 Equalization, No. … Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 237-38 (1985); see, e.g., 1 Firearms entitled to 11th Amendment immunity); Brown v. Cal.

Salfi v. Weinberger

373 F. Supp. 961 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 22, 1974

Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632 , 94 S.Ct. 791 , 39 L.Ed.2d 52 (decided January 21, 1974); Vlandis v. Kline, 412 U.S. 441 , 93 S.Ct. 2230 , 37 L.Ed.2d 63 (1973); Stanley v. … In Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur, supra, the Court struck down a requirement that pregnant teachers go on maternity leave several months prior to the expected birth.

Brown

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 13, 2026

See United States v. … Ashcroft v.

Scannell

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 7, 2026

Turrett Steel Corp. v. Manuel Int’l Inc., 612 F. Supp. 387, 390 (W.D. Pa. 1 WL 2076991, at *6 n.6 (N.D. Cal. … See, e.g., ECF No. 15 at 3 (citing Hanson v.

Scannell

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 18, 2026

Jackson v. Santander Consumer 9 USA, No. 2:24-cv-09492-SRM-SK, 2025 WL 3152241, at *2 n.2 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2025) (citing 10 Costlow v. … Utilities Grp. v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for W.

Yosemite Park & Curry Co. v. Collins

20 F. Supp. 1009 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 25, 1937

S. v. … Defendants, by analogy to State Board of Equalization v.

Arnheiter v. Ignatius

292 F. Supp. 911 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 22, 1968

See, Brown v. Gamage, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 269 , 377 F.2d 154 (1967); Kennedy v. Commandant, 258 F.Supp. 967 (D. Kan.1966). See also, Sohm v. … See, Brown v. McNamara, 387 F.2d 150 (3rd Cir. 1967); Chavez v. Ferguson, 266 F.Supp. 879 (N.D.Cal.1967); Gilliam v. Reaves, 263 F.Supp. 378 (W.D.La.1966); In re Kanewske, 260 F.Supp. 521 (N.D. Cal.1966).

United States v. McFadden

309 F. Supp. 502 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 20, 1970

See Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599, 605-607 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961). … See McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420, 450-452 , 81 S.Ct. 1101 , 6 L.Ed.2d 393 (1961); Braunfeld v. Brown, supra, 366 U.S. at 608-609, 81 S.Ct. 1144 , 6 L.Ed.2d 563 (1961). Here numerous alternatives are available.

Gamage v. United States

217 F. Supp. 381 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 4, 1962

Count III alleges an action in defamation resulting from a report delivered by Doe Sixteen through Doe Twenty to the Physical Evaluation Board of the Base. … Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 , 71 S.Ct. 153 , 95 L.Ed. 152 ; United States v. Brown, 348 U.S. 110 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 ; Layne v. United States, 7 Cir., 295 F.2d 433 ; Callaway v.

Wininger v. SI Management L.P.

32 F. Supp. 2d 1144 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 4, 1997

Against Registration and the Draft v. Governing Board of Grossmont Union High School Dist., 790 F.2d 1471 , 1473 n. 3 (9th Cir.1986)). … In Smallwood , the board of directors of a corporation sent a letter to its shareholders describing a proposed merger that the board had just approved.

Roling v. ETrade Securities LLC

279 F.R.D. 522 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 24, 2012

Most notably, in Scalp & Blade, Inc. v. … Fairbanks v.

Gage v. Wexler

82 F.R.D. 717 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 14, 1979

Agency v. Gage, No. 643316 (Sup.Ct.1972) (eviction from Redevelopment Agency property located at 1250 McAllister Street); Agency v. … Reese v. Nixon, 347 F.Supp. 314, 316 (C.D.Cal.1972). .

Board of Trustees of the Ken Lusby Clerks & Lumber Handlers Pension Fund v. Piedmont Lumber & Mill Co.

132 F. Supp. 3d 1175 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 16, 2015

Co. v. … See Vaughn v.

Allstate Insurance v. Tankovich Ex Rel. Ahl

776 F. Supp. 1394 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 3, 1991

British Airways Board v. Boeing Co., 585 F.2d 946, 950-52 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 1790 , 60 L.Ed.2d 241 (1979). … Co. v. Browning, 598 F.Supp. 421, 424 (D.C.Ore.1983). In Browning , the insured’s son harassed a black family by “burning a cross in their front yard and shouting racial epithets at them.” Id. at 422 .

Nathanson v. Polycom, Inc.

87 F. Supp. 3d 966 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 3, 2015

despite leaving Polycom four months before Brown became CFO). … Hence, Plaintiff’s claims against Kourey and Brown are DISMISSED. 3.

Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust Fund v. Jones

646 F. Supp. 228 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 24, 1986

Cal.Civ.Code §. 4452; Brown v. Devine, 574 F.Supp. 790, 793 (N.D.Cal.1983). The court finds that Karen is Earl’s putative spouse. Cal.Civ.Code § 4401 voids “from the beginning” bigamous marriages. … Chirmside v. Board of Administration, 143 Cal.App.3d 205, 211 , 191 Cal.Rptr. 605 (1983), citing, Henn v.