Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
0.72s
District Court, N.D. California · Jun 14, 2020
(relying on Becerra, 2012 WL 6115627, at 11 *5); Brown v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., 2015 WL 9690357, at *14 (C.D. Cal. … Brown, 2015 WL 9690357, at *15.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPersonalWeb Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc.
69 F. Supp. 3d 1022 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 24, 2014
If the PTO grants a petition for inter partes review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) must complete the inter partes review within one year. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 (a)-(c), 316(a)(11). B. … For example, in KLA-Tencor Corp. v.
Cited 50 timesPublishedKlink v. ABC Phones of North Carolina, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Aug 20, 2021
Rosenthal v. Great W. Fin. Sec. … For example, in Gonzalez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Sep 4, 2024
Balistreri v. … West v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Oct 29, 2020
No. 23 (“FAC”) at ¶ 1. 20 Defendant Pinterest, Inc. is an online platform that allows users to create their own virtual 21 “pinboards” or “boards,” by “pinning” images to their boards. See id. at ¶ 14. … See Harrington III v. 17 Pinterest, Inc., No. 4:20-cv-05290-EJD (N.D. Cal.).
Cited 0 timesUnknownCounty of Santa Clara v. Trump
275 F. Supp. 3d 1196 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 20, 2017
Mathews v. … See Califano v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedUnited States v. Arteaga-Centeno
365 F. Supp. 3d 1023 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 4, 2019
Under the Ninth Circuit's recent opinion in Karingithi v. … Karingithi v. Whitaker , 913 F.3d 1158 (9th Cir. 2019).
Cited 1 timesPublishedDeneau v. Coastal Home Care Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Aug 12, 2024
Lim v. … Pinnacle 10 Museum Tower Ass’n v. Pinnacle Mkt. Dev. (US), LLC, 55 Cal. 4th 223, 236 (2012) (citing Craig 11 v. Brown & Root, Inc., 84 Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMehr v. Féderation Internationale de Football Ass'n
115 F. Supp. 3d 1035 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 16, 2015
Brown, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2846, 2851 , 180 L.Ed.2d 796 (2011)); see Int’l Shoe, 326 U.S. at 316-20 , 66 S.Ct. 154 . 2. … See Sanders v. Brown, 504 F.3d 903, 910 (9th Cir.2007).
Cited 11 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Nov 8, 2019
SULLIVAN, et al., Case No. 19-cv-03187-MMC 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' 9 v. … Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011), or, alternatively, that the instant 2 action “arise[s] out of” any such defendant’s “contacts with [said] forum,” see Bristol- 3 || Myers Squibb v. Superior Court, 137 S.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJewish Legal News, Inc. v. Alameda Unified School District, et al.
District Court, N.D. California · Mar 3, 2026
Stockton v. 22 Brown, 152 F.4th 1124, 1135 (9th Cir. 2025). … Stockton v. Brown, 152 F.4th 1124, 24 1147 (9th Cir. 2025) (quoting Pennsylvania Fam. Inst., 489 F.3d at 165 (3d. Cir.) and In re 25 Application of Dow Jones & Co., Inc., 842 F.2d 603, 608 (2d Cir. 1988)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Feb 6, 2024
Brown v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., No. 4:13-CV-05205 25 YGR, 2014 WL 715082, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2014). … Gherebi v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · May 31, 2024
Kamakana v. … For example, in Exhibit II, it states 10 “Xpanse leadership will propose a one-time funding proposal to be presented to the Board of 11 Directors of Xpanse (“Board”) by the end of Q1 2021 to cover Xpanse operations
Cited 0 timesUnknownRobin Berman v. Microchip Technology Incorporated
District Court, N.D. California · Jul 29, 2022
26 McDaniel v. … See Cree v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSender v. Franklin Resources, Inc.
931 F. Supp. 2d 959 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2013
See Brown v. Walgreens Income Prot. Plan for Store Mgrs., No. 10-14442, 2012 WL 1060093 , at *2 (E.D.Mich. Mar. 29, 2012). That case is not binding authority on this Court and, in any event, is not persuasive. … Fund v.
Cited 0 timesPublished783 F. Supp. 1245 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 6, 1991
McQuillion v. Rushen, 639 F.Supp. 420, 424 (N.D.Cal.1986). … In its support, the State cites People v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedBailey v. LinkedIn Corporation
District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 2021
Oneok, Inc. v. … Armas v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., No. 5:17-CV-06909-EJD, 2019 WL 3323057, at *2 18 (N.D. Cal. July 24, 2019) (citing Ammons v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownE&B Natural Resources Management Corporation v. County of Alameda
District Court, N.D. California · Jun 8, 2020
Club v. … In Mobil 2 Oil Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown690 F. Supp. 2d 1011 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 4, 2010
Weiss declares that she has discussed the circumstances of Plaintiffs leave of absence and termination only with the evaluating physicians and their assistants, the California Board of Registered Nurses and EMC management … Weiss admittedly made statements about Plaintiffs mental health to EMC’s management and counsel and to the Board of Registered Nurses. Because these parties are interested persons as defined by the statute, Ms.
Cited 11 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Feb 27, 2024
Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). 8 Federal courts “‘leave it to the ALJ to determine credibility, resolve conflicts in the testimony, and 9 resolve ambiguities in the record.’” Id. … (quoting Treichler v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna