Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
0.78s
391 F. Supp. 3d 946 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 17, 2019
Given the USPTO Director has instituted review of Apple's first two petitions, and given that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") must now issue final written decisions as to every ground raised in the instituted petition … See Knievel v.
Cited 19 timesPublished843 F. Supp. 1329 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 2, 1994
City of Los Angeles v. … V. Plaintiffs’ State Law Claims Dr.
Cited 55 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jun 20, 2024
(quoting Leite v. … Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Feb 3, 2022
Corp. v. … , motor starters, motor controllers . . . asbestos arc chutes, ebony 10 board, phenolic materials, paper, wire and cable[,] . . . pumps, valves, and turbines.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Apr 22, 2022
Consequently, any decision by the Board or a state court denying him counsel or 20 an expert for his parole hearings does not afford him grounds for federal habeas relief. … Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 3 484 (2000).
Cited 0 timesUnknownLam Research Corp. v. Schunk Semiconductor
65 F. Supp. 3d 863 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 22, 2014
See Brown v. Toscano, 630 F.Supp.2d 1342, 1346 (S.D.Fla.2008) (“Defendants did not proffer any facts or explanation supporting their contention that they will likely prevail on the infringement issue.... … See, e.g., Real v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 2021
Willis v. … Snipes v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownContest Promotions, LLC v. City & County of San Francisco
100 F. Supp. 3d 835 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 22, 2015
On July 8, 2014, the City’s Board of Supervisors approved the settlement and Contest Promotions made an initial payment of $150,000. Id. ¶24. II. … Ward v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedTucker v. Post Consumer Brands, LLC
District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2020
See Durnford v. … Bates v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHernandez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
District Court, N.D. California · Apr 19, 2020
Torrisi v. 8 Tuscan Elec. Power Co., 8 F.3d 1370, 1375 (9th Cir. 1993) (citation omitted). … v 14 For reasons stated on the record, the proposed settlement falls within the range of 3 15 possible approval.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jul 24, 2024
Brown v. Muniz, 12 889 F.3d 661, 667 (9th Cir. 2018) (citing Panetti v. … Slack v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownIslam v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
136 F. Supp. 3d 1088 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 25, 2015
An IJ cannot -grant asylum to an applicant who falls within any of the aforementioned sub clauses.- Initially, the IJ denied plaintiffs asylum application, but the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) reversed and remanded … Hydranautics v. FilmTec Corp., 204 F.3d 880, 885 (9th Cir.2000) (quoting Younan v. Caruso, 51 Cal.App.4th 401, 406-07 , 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 103 (1996)).
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Sep 4, 2024
Balistreri v. … West v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jun 4, 2026
Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492; see also Norman v. Berryhill, No. 5 17-CV-04108-SI, 2018 WL 4519952, at *8 (N.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknown172 F. Supp. 890 · District Court, N.D. California · May 4, 1959
Osborn resigned as a member of the Atlas board of directors in July of 1916 leaving Tuck and Green as majority stockholders. … Again, in McGehee v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Apr 4, 2024
July 2, 1996); see also, e.g., Victor R. v. O’Malley, No. 23-cv-501-GPC-BGS, 2024 WL 392616, at *5 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2024); Darren Jeffrey C. v. Kijakazi, No. 21-cv-1012-AHG, 2022 WL 4474261, at *10 (S.D. Cal. … See Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 495-96 (9th Cir. 2015). IT IS SO ORDERED.
Cited 0 timesUnknown842 F. Supp. 1232 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 19, 1994
Power *1237 v. Westinghouse Elec., 597 F.Supp. 1102 (D.Ariz.1984). … See also CAMSI IV, supra (Regional Board ordered plaintiff to investigate the groundwater and soil of the property).
Cited 6 timesPublished81 F. Supp. 3d 811 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 25, 2015
Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 405 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997). … Brown, 520 U.S. at 404 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 . Moreover, a policy of inaction may be a municipal policy within the meaning of Monell. See Long v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, 442 F.3d 1178, 1185 (9th Cir.2006); Fairley v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jun 14, 2020
(relying on Becerra, 2012 WL 6115627, at 11 *5); Brown v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., 2015 WL 9690357, at *14 (C.D. Cal. … Brown, 2015 WL 9690357, at *15.
Cited 0 timesUnknownJohn Muir Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Davis
559 F. Supp. 1042 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 17, 1983
Plaintiffs appealed the intermediary’s actions to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB), a tribunal of cost reimbursement experts, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo. … Saine v. Hospital Authority of Hall County, 502 F.2d 1033, 1034-35 (5th Cir.1974); Euresti v. Stenner, 458 F.2d 1115, 1118-9 (10th Cir.1972).
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna