Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
1.33s
Vericool World LLC v. Igloo Products Corporation
District Court, N.D. California · Dec 13, 2023
Board Game.” Id. … with the idea for such a board game.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCitizens for Free Speech, LLC v. County of Alameda
194 F. Supp. 3d 968 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 8, 2016
Smith v. Univ. of Wash. … Travel v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedWorrell v. Uniforms to You & Co.
673 F. Supp. 1461 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 2, 1987
In Zipes v. … Nor does Malone v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedCortez v. United States of America
District Court, N.D. California · Aug 21, 2024
Proc. § 377.60(b)(1), namely, that they 14 were "actually dependent, to some extent, upon the decedent for the necessaries of life," 15 see Chavez v. Carpenter, 91 Cal. … Code § 377.11, one example being that they are 4 || beneficiaries "under the terms of [a] trust instrument" so providing, see Brown v. Gordon, 5 |} 2022 WL 2391002, at 3 (N.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknown338 F. Supp. 1219 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 3, 1971
United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 280 U.S. 320, 326-327 , 50 S.Ct. 118 , 74 L.Ed. 451 (1930); Mejia v. … Epling v. M. T.
Cited 7 timesPublishedContinental Insurance v. Kawasaki Kisen Kasha, Ltd.
542 F. Supp. 2d 1031 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 25, 2008
Caterpillar Inc. v. … By its terms, COGSA applies between the “tackles” — in other words, while the cargo is physically on board the ship.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMulligan v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.
36 F. Supp. 3d 942 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 2014
In Westley v. … The Court noted that the inference was even stronger than in America West because “[defendants in America West were outside directors who did no more for the company than attend board meetings and serve on a board committee
Cited 15 timesPublished173 F. Supp. 2d 1029 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 9, 2001
See Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); De La Cruz v. … See North Haven Board of Education v. Bell, 456 U.S. 512, 521 , 102 S.Ct. 1912 , 72 L.Ed.2d 299 (1982); United States v. Naftalin, 441 U.S. 768, 773-774 , 99 S.Ct. 2077 , 60 L.Ed.2d 624 (1979).
Cited 3 timesPublishedRodriguez v. Seabreeze JetLev, LLC
District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 2022
Jordan; (2) the decedent’s sister, Shirena Brown; and (3) Ms. … B to Schultz Decl. – ECF No. 140-1 at 32–47. 25 16 Brown Dep. Tr., Ex.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBest v. Continental Casualty Co.
272 F. Supp. 252 · District Court, N.D. California · May 3, 1966
Stevens testimony that the Peruvian political crisis severely threatened Standard Oil’s interests and that the Board of Directors was concerned and carefully watching the events of that period. Mr. … See Continental Casualty Company Policy (Part V); Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York Policy (Part 3); Mutual of Omaha Policy (Part F). .
Cited 3 timesPublishedCable Electric Products, Inc. v. Genmark, Inc.
586 F. Supp. 1505 · District Court, N.D. California · May 25, 1984
On defendant’s package, its registered mark “Good Nite Light” appears in large white letters on the brown background formed by the darkened wall of the child’s room in the photograph. … See, e.g., Aronson v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedContreras v. Corinthian Vigor Insurance Brokerage, Inc.
103 F. Supp. 2d 1180 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 20, 2000
See Dunlop v. … V.
Cited 9 timesPublishedStanislaus Food Products Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
560 F. Supp. 114 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 1982
In Butz v. … See also, Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir.1981) (granting immunity to parole board officials); Clark v. Washington, 366 F.2d 678 (9th Cir.1966) (granting immunity to a State Bar Association).
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Dec 5, 2019
De Long v. … Ou-Young v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown6 F. Supp. 3d 1028 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 19, 2013
The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and various federal courts have weighed in on this question, with varying results. … Hosh, at 378, 381; see Demore v.
Cited 2 timesPublished68 F. Supp. 3d 1113 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 12, 2014
Under the holding of Terry v. … United States v. Brown, No. 14-CR-20007, 2014 WL 3924635 , at *2 (C.D.Ill. Aug. 11, 2014) appears to have reached the same con-elusion, but it may have done so in dicta.
Cited 3 timesPublishedOperating Engineers v. United States
District Court, N.D. California · Feb 10, 2023
Addisu v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 198 F.3d 1130, 1134 (9th Cir. 2000). … Koff v. United States, 3 F.3d 9 1297, 1298 (9th Cir. 1993) (citation omitted); see also Hazel v. Comm’r, 95 T.C.M.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHaralson v. United Airlines, Inc.
224 F. Supp. 3d 928 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 12, 2016
.”); Valles v. … Landers v.
Cited 25 timesPublishedHarrington III v. Pinterest, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Oct 29, 2020
No. 23 (“FAC”) at ¶ 1. 20 Defendant Pinterest, Inc. is an online platform that allows users to create their own virtual 21 “pinboards” or “boards,” by “pinning” images to their boards. See id. at ¶ 14. … See Harrington III v. 17 Pinterest, Inc., No. 4:20-cv-05290-EJD (N.D. Cal.).
Cited 0 timesUnknownLam Research Corp. v. Schunk Semiconductor
65 F. Supp. 3d 863 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 22, 2014
See Brown v. Toscano, 630 F.Supp.2d 1342, 1346 (S.D.Fla.2008) (“Defendants did not proffer any facts or explanation supporting their contention that they will likely prevail on the infringement issue.... … See, e.g., Real v.
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna