Case law

Kayser v. Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp.

718 F. Supp. 815 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 7, 1989

On April 24, 1987, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB) found that Centennial was insolvent and appointed FSLIC as receiver. … Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. CHG International, Inc., 811 F.2d 1209, 1215 (9th Cir.1987), cert. dismissed, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 358 , 102 L.Ed.2d 349 (1988) (quoting Chevron U.S.A. v.

Scott Griffith Collaborative Solutions, LLC v. Falck Northern California Corp.

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 16, 2019

Swanson v. U.S. Forest Serv.., 3|| 87 F.3d 339, 345 (9th Cir. 1996) (holding that district court has discretion to disregard briefs filed in circumvention of page limits). … exhibits in the form of indexed and tabbed binders. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15|| Dated: 10/16/19 Aeuwtin I Ganatiing 16 AUNDRA BROWN

Eldredge v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Joint Apprenticeship & Training Committee

83 F.R.D. 136 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 9, 1979

K—2 Ski Company v. Head Ski Co., 506 F.2d 471 , 476-477 (9 Cir.1974). … In Corcoran v.

Darwin v. United States

435 F. Supp. 501 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 7, 1977

In Ramirez v. … In Gallardo v. Westfal-Larsen & Co.

Norsworthy v. Beard

87 F. Supp. 3d 1164 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 2, 2015

A court may properly take notice of its own records in other cases, U.S. v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir.1980), and of the official records of the CDCR, Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926 , 931 n. 7 (9th Cir.2005). … Wakefield v.

Sugiharto

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 3, 2026

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). … See Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492.

In Re Autodesk, Inc. Securities Litigation

132 F. Supp. 2d 833 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 14, 2000

Bartz (“Bartz”) was the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Autodesk; defendant Eric B. … The case cited by plaintiffs, Stanley v.

In re AT&T Inc. Customer Data Security Breach Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 17, 2026

Supp. 3d at 1352 n.2. 2 See Williams v. AT&T, Inc., No. 24-01386 (N.D. Tex. filed June 6, 2024) (Williams I). … Brown for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Matthew F.

Calvillo v. Marquez

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 26, 2024

Sandin v. … Calvillo’s loss of good time credits at most delays the parole board’s 23 intervening decision, that loss does not implicate a liberty interest sufficient to trigger the Due 24 Process Clause. See, e.g., Barno v.

Regents of University of Michigan v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 12, 2023

Capella Photonics, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., 4 2015 WL 1006582, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2015) (citing Ethicon, Inc. v. Quigg, 849 F.2d 1422, 5 1426–27 (Fed. Cir. 1988)). … See Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp., 139 F. Supp. 3d 12 1032, 1036 (N.D.

Flannery

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 17, 2026

Brown v. Ambow Educ. Holding Ltd., No. 12-cv-5062 PSG AJWX, 2014 WL 2 523166, at *9 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2014). … GMBH v.

(HC)Lopez v. Robinson

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 23, 2021

Petitioner alleges that the Parole Board 10 “deems the guilty finding adversely.” ECF No. 1 at 5. … See 23 Ramirez v.

Seeno v. Discovery Builders, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 20, 2024

. § 1115(a); see also Sebastian Brown Prods., LLC v. Muzooka, Inc., 143 F. Supp. 9 3d 1026, 1039–40 (N.D. … Sebastian Brown Prods., 11 LLC v. Muzooka, Inc., 143 F. Supp. 3d 1026, 1041 (N.D.

Intel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

662 F. Supp. 1507 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 23, 1987

Franchise Tax Board of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern California, 463 U.S. 1 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983); Lambert Run Coal Company v. … Compare Karel v. Kroner, 635 F.Supp. at 731 , Cianci v.

Stewart v. Department of Consumer Affairs of California

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 20, 2022

Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 541 (1981) overruled on other grounds by 26 Daniels v. … See Brewster v. 3 Board of Educ. of the Lynwood Unified School Dist., 149 F.3d 971, 983 (9th Cir. 1998).

El Burro, Inc. v. Knuckle Sandwich LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 20, 2023

See Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 212-13 (2007). … The regulation itself explains that not filing “the required notice can result in termination of the Board proceeding.”

Pirani v. Slack Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2020

Board; and Social+Capital, which appointed defendant Palihapitiya to the board (collectively “VC 10 Defendants”). … Sept. 29. 2000) (no control for one defendant serving on Board, nor for another 27 defendant owning a 20% amount of shares that declined through class period); O’Sullivan v.

Rivas v. Kojakazi

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 29, 2024

Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc., 953 F.3d 567, 574 (9th 6 Cir. 2020) (citing Foman vy. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)). … If no amendment would allow the 8 complaint to withstand dismissal as a matter of law, courts consider amendment futile.” 9 Kroessler v.

Clark v. VIP PetCare, LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 6, 2023

See Brown v. Abercrombie 13 & Fitch Co., No. 4:13-CV-05205 YGR, 2014 WL 715082, at *4 (N.D. Cal. … Brown v., 2014 25 WL 715082, at *4 (citing cases). 26 To evaluate this factor, “courts must consider not only the number of witnesses, but also 27 the nature and quality

GTE Mobilnet of California Limited Partnership v. City of Berkeley

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 28, 2021

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 554, 555 (2007) (citing 27 Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 286 (1986)); see Lee v. … In T Mobile, the plaintiff, a wireless telecommunications service provider, applied 20 to a zoning board for permission to erect an antenna in Wilmington, Delaware. 913 F.3d at 316. 21 The zoning board orally denied