Case law

Mulligan v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.

36 F. Supp. 3d 942 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 2014

In Westley v. … The Court noted that the inference was even stronger than in America West because “[defendants in America West were outside directors who did no more for the company than attend board meetings and serve on a board committee

Flournoy v. Haakenson

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 28, 2023

Balistreri v. … Waldron, 210 F.3d 1008, 1012 (9th Cir. 2000). 24 Plaintiff also names the Marin County Board of Supervisors as a defendant in this case. 25 Although not entirely clear, it appears that he asked the Board

Golden Gate Audubon Society, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

717 F. Supp. 1417 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 21, 1988

For example, in United States v. … Similarly, in United States v.

Palafox v. Saul

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 18, 2023

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 488–89 (9th Cir. 2015). … See Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494. B.

Semiconductor Global Solutions v. Capital Asset Exchange and Trading, LLC, et al.

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 10, 2026

Brown v. MCI WorldCom Network Servs., Inc., 277 F.3d 1166, 1173 (9th 5 Cir. 2002) (citing Reiter v. Cooper, 507 U.S. 258, 268 (1993)). … v.

In Re Sanchez

173 F. Supp. 2d 1029 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 9, 2001

See Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); De La Cruz v. … See North Haven Board of Education v. Bell, 456 U.S. 512, 521 , 102 S.Ct. 1912 , 72 L.Ed.2d 299 (1982); United States v. Naftalin, 441 U.S. 768, 773-774 , 99 S.Ct. 2077 , 60 L.Ed.2d 624 (1979).

Pellegrini

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 20, 2026

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492 (cleaned up).

Communications Telesystems International v. California Public Utilities Commission

14 F. Supp. 2d 1165 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 22, 1998

Co. v. Board of Railroad Com’rs of California, 251 U.S. 366, 372-73 , 40 S.Ct. 174 , 64 L.Ed. 310 (1920). … There, plaintiffs challenged a decision of the California Agricultural Labor Relations Board. 805 F.2d at 1354.

In re VAXART, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 19, 2026

See Elkind v. … The defendants seek to ask Vaxart employees Sean Tucker (lead scientist), Brent Biehn (communications lead), Andre Floro1u (CEO), Wouter Latour (former CEO), Michael Finney (board member), and Margaret Echard (board member

Palazuelos v. Frisk

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 29, 2022

Balistreri v. … West v.

Howington

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 29, 2026

See, e.g., Affinity Credit Union v. Apple 12 Inc., No. 22-cv-04174-JSW, 2024 WL 3859802, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2024); Alta Devices, 13 Inc. v. … Feb. 14 20, 2019); see also Apple Inc. v.

Darwin v. United States

435 F. Supp. 501 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 7, 1977

In Ramirez v. … In Gallardo v. Westfal-Larsen & Co.

Gaines v. State of California

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 5, 2024

Abcarian v. Levine, 972 F.3d 1019, 1028 (9th Cir. 26 2020) (quoting Grimmett v. Brown, 75 F.3d 506, 510 (9th Cir. 1996)). … Plaintiff has named the State of California and the Franchise Tax Board as 18 Defendants. Sec. Amended Compl. at 1-2.

In Re Autodesk, Inc. Securities Litigation

132 F. Supp. 2d 833 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 14, 2000

Bartz (“Bartz”) was the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Autodesk; defendant Eric B. … The case cited by plaintiffs, Stanley v.

K.C. v. County of Alameda

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 29, 2024

(quoting Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int’l Ins. … Part III was even completed regarding Brown’s death.

Stanislaus Food Products Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

560 F. Supp. 114 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 1982

In Butz v. … See also, Sellars v. Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir.1981) (granting immunity to parole board officials); Clark v. Washington, 366 F.2d 678 (9th Cir.1966) (granting immunity to a State Bar Association).

Pacific Employers' Ins. v. Pillsbury

14 F. Supp. 156 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 20, 1936

Jordan v. Roden (C.C.A.) 292 F. 573, 580 . … Co. v. Phoenix Indemnity Co., 281 U.S. 98, 99, 107 , 50 S.Ct. 242 , 74 L.Ed. 726 ; Crowell v. Benson, 285 U.S. 22 , 52 S.Ct. 285 , 76 L.Ed. 598 ; Harper v.

Martin v. Young

134 F. Supp. 204 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 1, 1955

In United States v. … Gusik v. Schilder, 1950, 340 U.S. 128 , 71 S.Ct. 149 , 95 L.Ed. 146 ; McMahan v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 1950, 179 F.2d 661 . 5 . In re Loney, 1890, 134 U.S. 372 , 10 S.Ct. 584 , 33 L.Ed. 949 ; State of Ohio v.

Society for Human Resource Management v. Zrowth LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 2022

(quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)). For jurisdiction to be proper, then, the plaintiff must articulate a basis for specific jurisdiction over Zrowth. … Axiom Foods, Inc. v. Acerchem International, Inc., 874 F.3d 1064, 1069 (9th Cir. 2017) (quoting Washington Shoe Co. v. A-Z Sporting Goods Inc., 704 F.3d 668, 673 (9th Cir. 2012)).

Norsworthy v. Beard

87 F. Supp. 3d 1164 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 2, 2015

A court may properly take notice of its own records in other cases, U.S. v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir.1980), and of the official records of the CDCR, Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926 , 931 n. 7 (9th Cir.2005). … Wakefield v.