Case law

Drogitis v. Kijakazi

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 26, 2022

Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492-93 (emphasis added) (quoting Lingenfelter v. Astrue, 504 15 F.3d 1028, 1036 (9th Cir. 2007)).

Payward, Inc. v. Runyon

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 25, 2021

See JustMed, Inc. v. … See, e.g., Brenner v.

United States v. Wilson

611 F. Supp. 813 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 19, 1985

See Mattz v. … See also Udall v.

Fuhrmann v. Kijakazi

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 19, 2022

Brown v. 11 Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 443 (9th Cir. 1983). Here, the ALJ appropriately set forth the applicable 12 law regarding the required five-step sequential evaluation process. … Laborin v. Berryhill, 867 F.3d 1151, 1155 (9th Cir. 2017) (quoting Brown-Hunter v. 1 clear and convincing standard is the most demanding required in Social Security cases.’” Garrison 2 v.

John Muldoon v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 23, 2024

Brown, 504 F.3d 903, 910 (9th Cir. 2007). The court may also consider 14 matters that are properly the subject of judicial notice. Knievel v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068, 15 1076 (9th Cir. 2005); Lee v. … The California 5 Court of Appeal has extended the Brown exemption to design defect claims against “an 6 implanted prescription medical product”. Hufft v. Horowitz, 4 Cal.

In re VAXART, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 19, 2026

See Elkind v. … The defendants seek to ask Vaxart employees Sean Tucker (lead scientist), Brent Biehn (communications lead), Andre Floro1u (CEO), Wouter Latour (former CEO), Michael Finney (board member), and Margaret Echard (board member

Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. Perry

302 F. Supp. 3d 1094 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 15, 2018

Vietnam Veterans of America v. CIA , 811 F.3d 1068 , 1078 (9th Cir. 2016) (quoting Christopher v. … Coos County Board of County Commissioners v. Kempthorne , 531 F.3d 792 , 803-05 (9th Cir. 2008) (assuming that a statutory duty to "promptly publish" a proposed regulation would be a nondiscretionary duty).

Rowen v. Prasifka

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 29, 2024

Fuller v. M.G. Jewelry, 950 F.2d 1437, 1442 (9th Cir. 1991) (citing 6 Fed. R. Civ. … of California adopting the Proposed Decision as the Decision and Order of the 14 Medical Board of California (“CMB”) dated August 25, 2023.

Spies v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am.

312 F. Supp. 3d 805 · District Court, N.D. California · May 7, 2018

Brown v. Google, Inc. , No. C-05-01779 RMW, 2005 WL 1868186 , at *3 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2005). The evidence shows that Spies never elected LTD coverage. Therefore, she never became a participant in that insurance plan. … In Leeson v.

Golden Gate Restaurant Ass'n v. City of San Francisco

535 F. Supp. 2d 968 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 26, 2007

BACKGROUND In 2006, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors unanimously passed, and the Mayor signed into law, the San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance (the “Ordinance”). … Rutledge v.

White v. PayPal, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 27, 2020

Case No. 19-cv-08015-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE 9 v. … Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 284 (1979) (discussing the very limited circumstances 1 Magistrate Judge Ryu recommends that this case be dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject 2 || matter jurisdiction. 3

In re Lyft Inc. Securities Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 20, 2021

(“Lyft”), Logan Green, Co-Founder, Chief Executive Officer, and Director on 20 Lyft’s board of directors (the “Board”), John Zimmer, Co-Founder, President and Vice Chairman 21 of the Board, Brian Roberts, Chief Financial … Officer, Prashant (Sean) Aggarwal, Chairman of the 22 Board, Board Members Ben Horowitz, Valerie Jarrett, David Lawee, Hiroshi Mikitani, Ann 23 Miura-Ko, and Mary Agnes (Maggie) Wilderotter (“Individual Defendants,

Doe v. Samuel Merritt University

921 F. Supp. 2d 958 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 1, 2013

See Bartlett v. N.Y. … Zukle v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., 166 F.3d 1041, 1047 (9th Cir.1999); see also Wong v.

Sanders

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 30, 2025

Achal v. Gate Gourmet, Inc., 114 F. Supp. 3d 781, 800–01 (N.D. Cal. 2015) (citing Slatkin v. Univ. of Redlands, 88 Cal. App. 4th 1147, 1158, (2001)). … Martin v. Bd. of Trs. of Cal. State Univ., 97 Cal. App. 5th 149, 169 (2023) (cleaned up) (quoting Reid v. Google, Inc., 50 Cal. 4th 512, 542 (2010)). See generally Amador v. SBE Ent.

Parker v. Pacific Box Corp.

11 F. Supp. 915 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 23, 1935

Knapp v. Morss, 150 U. S. 221 , 14 S. Ct. 81 , 37 L. Ed. 1059 ; Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U. S. 186 , 14 S. Ct. 310 , 38 L. Ed. 121 ; Wells v. Curtis (C. C. A.) 66 F. 318 ; Eames v. Andrews, 122 U. S. 40 , 7 S. … Ed. 221 ; Germer Stove Co. v. Art Stove Co. (C. C. A.) 150 F. 141 ; Carlton v. Bokee, 17 Wall. 463 , 21 L. Ed. 517, 519 ; Merrill v. Yeomans, 94 U. S. 568 , 24 L. Ed. 235 ; Palmer v. John E. Brown Mfg. Co. (C. C.

Swanson v. United States

229 F. Supp. 217 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 6, 1964

After all testing had been completed, the “complete engineering package” was to be submitted to the Air Force Configuration and Control Board for approval. … See United States v. Johnson, 5 Cir., 288 F.2d 40 ; O’Connor v. United States, 2 Cir., 251 F.2d 939 ; United States v. Kesinger, 10 Cir., 190 F.2d 529 ; Blumenthal v. United States, D.C., 189 F.Supp. 439 ; Norden v.

Gaines v. State of California

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 5, 2024

Abcarian v. Levine, 972 F.3d 1019, 1028 (9th Cir. 26 2020) (quoting Grimmett v. Brown, 75 F.3d 506, 510 (9th Cir. 1996)). … Plaintiff has named the State of California and the Franchise Tax Board as 18 Defendants. Sec. Amended Compl. at 1-2.

Bot M8 LLC v. Sony Corporation Of America

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 27, 2020

Ashcroft 16 v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). … PageMelding, Inc. v. ESPN, Inc., No. C 11-06263 WHA, 2012 WL 851574, 26 at *2 (N.D. Cal.

Operating Engineers' Pension Trust Fund v. Clark's Welding & MacHine

688 F. Supp. 2d 902 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 10, 2010

In Board of Trustees of Trucking Employees of North Jersey Welfare Fund, Inc. v. … V.

Del Campo v. Kennedy

491 F. Supp. 2d 891 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 5, 2006

Both chapters are local option schemes that leave the decision to implement such diversion programs to the county board of supervisors, conditioned on the approval of the district attor *900 ney, in order to meet the individual … The statutory scheme is such that the board of supervisors within each county is responsible for finding funding for the diversion program and ratifying its implementation. Cal.Penal Code § 1001.60. .