Case law

Chung v. County of Santa Clara

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 11, 2022

Hernandez v. … Ulrich v.

Ballard

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 13, 2026

Carden, 626 F.2d at 84 (citing Perez v. … Aug. 10, 2011); see also Carden, 626 F.2d at 84 (alleged violation of 23 speedy trial rights not alone an extraordinary circumstance); Brown v.

Garcia v. Dudum

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 2022

Id. 17 Defendants have also submitted a copy of the Sandwich Board’s ADA policy manual. Dkt. … Miller v. Lifestyle Creations, Inc., 993 F.2d 883 (9th Cir. 1993) (quoting Augustine v. 8 United States, 704 F.2d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1983)).

Mauricio v. Suncrest Health Services, LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 15, 2023

Miller v. … Gaus v.

Stewart v. United States

158 F. Supp. 25 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 18, 1957

In California Trust Co. v. … Mazman v. Brown, 1936, 12 Cal.App.2d 272 , 55 P.2d 539 . However, the wife’s right to contest is not activated until the death of the insured husband, when the gift was completed.

Bhatia v. Silvergate Bank

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 1, 2023

of 20 || directors, the date of every meeting, and board minutes. … Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011). A 12 bank is a citizen of the state in which its main office is located. Rouse v. Wachovia Mortg., FSB, 13 747 F.3d 707, 715 (9th Cir. 2014); see 28 U.S.C.A. § 1348.

Dickerson v. Macmillan

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 16, 2024

In Golub v. Gigamon, the plaintiff challenged statements 14 relating to the Board’s belief that a set of updated financial protections were a “better reflection of 15 Gigamon’s financial outlook.” Golub v. … Sys. v.

Survivors v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior

336 F. Supp. 3d 1131 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 24, 2018

Health v. Vilsack , No. 15-CV-01690-JSC, 2016 WL 3383954 , at *10 (N.D. Cal. June 20, 2016) (citing Pollinator Stewardship Council v. U.S. … In particular, Justice Scalia stated: If there is in fact some specific order or regulation, applying some particular measure across the board to all individual classification terminations and withdrawal revocations, and

Hoy v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

861 F. Supp. 881 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 7, 1994

Hillsman v. … Comeaux v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Co., 915 F.2d 1264, 1269-72 (9th Cir.1990).

Carbon Crest LLC v. Tencue Productions, LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2022

Brack v. … And, although Carbon 9 Crest cites Delaware law allowing delegation of board authority, “California has recognized 10 the rule that the board cannot delegate its function to govern.” Kennerson v.

Cal. Spine & Neurosurgery Inst. v. Blue Cross of Cal.

358 F. Supp. 3d 949 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 7, 2019

Brown , 504 F.3d 903 , 910 (9th Cir. 2007) ("a court can consider a document on which the complaint relies if the document is central to the plaintiff's claim, and no party questions the authenticity of the document"). … (quoting Davidowitz v. Delta Dental Plan of California, Inc. , 946 F.2d 1476 , 1481 (9th Cir. 1991) ); Spinedex Physical Therapy USA Inc. v.

Richter v. CC-Palo Alto, Inc.

176 F. Supp. 3d 877 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 31, 2016

Wolfe v. … CC-PA is presently in the process of challenging the tax assessment with the Assessment Appeals Board. Corp. MTD at 12.

Lopez v. County of Santa Clara

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 19, 2020

Hernandez v. Cnty. of Tulare, 666 F.3d 631, 637 (9th Cir. 2012) 6 |(citation omitted); see also Brown vy. County of Mariposa, No. 18-cv-01541, 2019 WL 1993990, at 7 ||\(E.D. Cal. … Brown, 2019 WL 1993990, at *8 13 |\(citing Thomas v. Cnty. of Riverside, 763 F.3d 1167, 1170 (9th Cir. 2014)).

Sanders

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 18, 2026

See Whittlestone, Inc. v. … Cal. 2023) (requiring only that affirmative defenses be pleaded to give fair notice); L.F. by & through Brown v. City of Stockton, No. 17-cv-01648-KJM, 2018 WL 3817558, at *4 (E.D. Cal.

United States v. Fernandez

430 F. Supp. 794 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 20, 1976

Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960); Brown v. United States, 411 U.S. 223 , 93 S.Ct. 1565 , 36 L.Ed.2d 208 (1973); United States v. Smith, 495 F.2d 668 (10th Cir. 1974). … In Jones v.

Firsov

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 21, 2026

Picot v. … See Daimler AG v.

Tobkin v. Waltrip (In re Waltrip)

139 B.R. 492 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 1, 1991

(citing Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979)). … Stone, 94 B.R. at 301 -01 (quoting Lummus Co. v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., 297 F.2d 80, 89 (2d Cir.1961) cert. denied, sub nom., Dawson v. Lummus Co., 368 U.S. 986 , 82 S.Ct. 601 , 7 L.Ed.2d 524 (1962)).

Adams v. Committee on Judicial Conduct & Disability

165 F. Supp. 3d 911 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 25, 2016

Leigh v. … member, employee, or counsel from disclosing proceedings before the board, but not own testimony); cf.

Hart v. TWC Product and Technology LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2022

Holley v. Gilead Scis., Inc., No. 18-CV-06972 JST (JSC), 2021 22 WL 2371890, at *3 (N.D. Cal. … the primary purpose of the Privacy 16 || Review Board was to offer legal advice.

Milton v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation CTF- Soledad

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 23, 2024

Unlike Clark, who remained in his cell during the Operation, Brown was 1 308. … Lawrence Brown 21 Throughout their opposition, Plaintiffs state that they seek to substitute Lawrence Brown 22 as a Plaintiff in this case.