Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
1.86s
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Loube
91 Daily Journal DAR 8366 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 10, 1991
On July 21,1988, the Federal Home Loan Bank Board appointed the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (“FSLIC”) as receiver for First Security. … In Danner v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedIn Re Insurance Antitrust Litigation
723 F. Supp. 464 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 10, 1989
Plaintiffs’ argument that the standards for state action immunity under Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), should apply to the McCarran Act lacks any support. … Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶¶ 210.1b, 212.1f, at 113 (Supp.1988) (“The [Supreme] Court’s view of federalism [under Parker v. Brown ] has left enormous discretion to the states to displace competition.”).
Reversed by a later decision, 938 F.2d 919 (1991)Cited 11 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jan 12, 2021
West v. … Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 6 U.S. at 691.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Sep 13, 2019
See Brown v. Grinder, No. 2:13-cv-01007-KJM-KJN, 2019 WL 5 2337107, at *5 (E.D. Cal. June 3, 2019) (holding that disclosure that did not identify any opinions 6 whatsoever did not satisfy Rule 26(a)(2)(C)(ii)). … McLean v. Cty. of Santa Clara, No. C05-01962 HRL, 2009 WL 189175, 9 *1 (N.D. Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jan 7, 2025
Supp. 3d 999, 1009–10 (N.D. 3 Cal. 2020); see also Brown v. … v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jul 7, 2026
See Hall v. … No. 12 at 7 (quoting Brown v. Nano Hearing Tech Opco, LLC, No. 3:24-CV-00221- 13 BTM-JLB, 2024 WL 3367536, at *19 (S.D. Cal. July 9, 2024)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownSchneider v. California Department of Corrections
957 F. Supp. 1145 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 24, 1997
Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … See, e.g., Coleman v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Gartner, Inc.
709 F. Supp. 2d 789 · District Court, N.D. California · May 3, 2010
Browne v. … Amant v.
Cited 4 timesPublished313 F. Supp. 245 · District Court, N.D. California · May 21, 1970
Compare Unger v. United States, 79 F.Supp. 281, 283 (E.D.Ill.1948) with McKinney v. United States, 301 F.Supp. 37, 38-39 (N.D.Ala.1969); McKay v. … United States v. Willoughby, 250 F.2d 524, 531 (9th Cir. 1957); McDaniel v. United States, 196 F.2d 291, 294-295 (5th Cir. 1952).
Cited 4 timesPublishedConcurrent Ventures, LLC, et al. v. Advanced Micro Devices Inc., et al.
District Court, N.D. California · Sep 14, 2026
Catch a Wave Techs., Inc. v. … Prop., LLC v. Micron Tech., Inc.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMetabyte, Inc v. Technicolor S.A
District Court, N.D. California · Apr 30, 2021
Usher v. … Brown, 75 F.3d 506, 511 (9th Cir. 19 1996) (quoting Stitt v. Williams, 919 F.2d 516, 525 (9th Cir. 1990)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Aug 12, 2020
See Cape Flattery Ltd. v. … App. 4th 175, 180, 186-194 (2016) 17 (clause providing for arbitration of any controversy “arising out of this agreement” was “narrow”); 18 compare Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownA&W Smelter and Refiners, Inc. v. Clinton
962 F. Supp. 1232 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 25, 1997
M/V American Queen v. San Diego Marine Const. … See U.S. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States Ex Rel. Hansen v. Cargill, Inc.
107 F. Supp. 2d 1172 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 24, 2000
Biddle v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford, Jr. University, 147 F.3d 821, 828 (9th Cir.1998). C. … Barth v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedGilroy Canning Co. v. CALIFORNIA CANNERS AND GROW.
15 F. Supp. 2d 943 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 21, 1998
Meghrig v. … See, Orange Environment, Inc. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 2020
Idaho v. U.S. … See Maya v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPak, M.D. v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
District Court, N.D. California · Feb 10, 2022
See Celotex Corp. v. 4 Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986). … See 14 Thornhill Publ’g Co., Inc. v. GTE Corp., 594 F.2d 730, 738 (9th Cir. 1979). 15 Under California law, interpretation of an insurance policy is a question of law. Waller v. 16 Truck Ins.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBayne v. Bowles Hall Foundation
District Court, N.D. California · Nov 9, 2021
The Board of Directors that decided to not renew Dr. … Corp. v. 8 Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 562 (2007) (citing Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 9 1106 (7th Cir. 1984)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Sep 30, 2025
of other directors (3 ER 18 437); Lopez-Flores attended board meetings but always deferred to Flores (4 ER 588, 610); and 19 that other board members were always Abiani or McClenahan (4 ER 609-610). … Santa Cruz 8 Empacadora, S. de R.L. de C.V. v. R.B. Packing of California, Inc., No. 00-CV-1217B (RBB), 9 2005 WL 8173035, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 13, 2005) (citing Arnold v. Browne, 27 Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAlioto v. Cowles Communications, Inc.
430 F. Supp. 1363 · District Court, N.D. California · May 3, 1977
In Garrison v. … See, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, above, 376 U.S. at 287 , 84 S.Ct. 710 ; Beckley Newspaper v. Hanks, 389 U.S. 81, 84-85 , 88 S.Ct. 197 , 19 L.Ed.2d 248 (1967).
Cited 11 timesPublished
Ask Donna