Case law

Major v. Ferdon

325 F. Supp. 1141 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 25, 1971

See Dombrowski v. Pfister, cit. supra note 3 at 484 (note 2); compare Cole v. Graybeal, 313 F.Supp. 48 (D.C.1970); Eve Productions, Inc. v. Shannon, 312 F.Supp. 26 (D.C.1970); Wilson v. … absence of specific language in that statute taking suits brought thereunder outside the purview of § 2283, this Court will follow those of its predecessors who have held that the Civil Rights Act provides no across the board

United States v. Freeman

443 F. Supp. 288 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 27, 1977

Chappell v. United States, 270 F.2d 274, 278 (9th Cir. 1959). As stated in Morissette v. … In United States v.

Bateman v. United States Postal Service

151 F. Supp. 2d 1131 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 29, 2001

(See Brown *1137 Decl., Ex. A.) … See Boyd v.

Rodriguez v. Google LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 2, 2025

Brown v. Google, LLC, No. 20-cv-3664-YGR, 2022 12 WL 17961497, at *10 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 12, 2022). … Fin. v. Cass Info.

Jack v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

854 F. Supp. 654 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 25, 1994

The report by the National Transportation Safety Board regarding a different incident on a different airline at a different airport is inadmissible. 49 U.S.C.App. § 1441(e); Protectus Alpha Navigation Co. v. … C 93-2981 BAC, Julia Elhauge v. TWA; m. C 93-2982 BAC, Marianne Eva Levine v. TWA; n. C 93-2983 BAC, Deena Anderson v. TWA; o. C 93-2984 BAC, Fulvia Mescola v. TWA; p. C 93-2985 BAC, Aghieszka Gal v. TWA; and q.

Pierce

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 18, 2026

Huynh v. … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 4 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v.

Smith v. Diaz

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 18, 2022

In addition, procedural due process requires that 6 the findings of the prison disciplinary board be supported by “some evidence” in the record. … Brown v. Amis, No. 16-CV-00603-HSG (PR), 2018 WL 3159224, at *2 (N.D. Cal. June 3 28, 2018) (citing Dilley v. Gunn, 64 F.3d 1365, 1368-69 (9th Cir. 1995) and Alvarez v.

In re Tesla Inc. Securities Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 7, 2022

See Howard v. … Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms. Inc., 10 509 U.S. 579, 592–93 (1993); see also Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v.

Toyo Kisen Kaisha v. W. R. Grace & Co.

48 F.2d 850 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 17, 1931

“AH on board to be delivered. “Kindly confirm on copy of this letter attached herewith. “Yours very truly, “W. R. Grace & Co. “Traffic Department. “K. Doi “Confirmed: “FPH :KR” Thereupon respondent’s. … See Northern Pacific Rv: Co. v. American Trading Co., 195 U. S. 439 , 25 S. Ct. 84 , 49 L. Ed. 269 ; The Arctic Bird (D. C.) 109 F. 167 . The libel will be dismissed.

Hinkins Steamship Agency v. Freighters, Inc.

351 F. Supp. 373 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 30, 1972

In Interocean Steamship Corporation v. … Marchessini & Co., Inc. v.

Beijing Tong Ren Tang (Usa) Corp. v. Trt USA Corp.

676 F. Supp. 2d 857 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 18, 2009

KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc., 408 F.3d 596, 608 (9th Cir.2005) (citing AMF v. Sleekcraft Boats, 599 F.2d 341, 348-49 (9th Cir.1979)). … Resolutions of the First Board of Directors Meeting” but he refused. Id. (the document is attached to Zhou Reply Decl. Ex. C).

Garcia v. Burton

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 16, 2020

See, e.g., White v. Ryan, 895 F.3d 641 (9th Cir. 2018); Browning v. Baker, 875 F.3d 444 (9th Cir. 2017).

Owner-Operators Independent Drivers Ass'n of America, Inc. v. Burnley

705 F. Supp. 481 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 6, 1989

Employees, Council 33 v. … For example, in Shoemaker v.

In Re Insurance Antitrust Litigation

723 F. Supp. 464 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 10, 1989

Plaintiffs’ argument that the standards for state action immunity under Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), should apply to the McCarran Act lacks any support. … Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶¶ 210.1b, 212.1f, at 113 (Supp.1988) (“The [Supreme] Court’s view of federalism [under Parker v. Brown ] has left enormous discretion to the states to displace competition.”).

Green v. San Mateo County

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 17, 2022

a city or county may not be 7 held vicariously liable for the unconstitutional acts of its employees under the theory of 8 respondeat superior, see Board of Cty. … Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 9 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v. City of Oakland, 47 F.3d 1522, 1534 (9th 10 Cir. 1995).

Concurrent Ventures, LLC, et al. v. Advanced Micro Devices Inc., et al.

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 14, 2026

Catch a Wave Techs., Inc. v. … Prop., LLC v. Micron Tech., Inc.

Duke v. San Francisco Community College District

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 31, 2020

A CCSF 6 board meeting was held on January 24th, 2019, and the Board of Trustees unanimously 7 voted to terminate Duke's employment. Id. ¶ 28. … State Personnel Board, 15 Cal. 3d 194 (1975); but the 1 theory. Somers v.

Reyes v. Sky Chefs, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 29, 2021

v. … Williams, 3 Cal. 5th at 545; Brown, 705 24 F. App’x at 645; see Jacobs v. Sustainability Partners LLC, No. 20-cv-01981-PJH, 2020 WL 25 5593200, at *17–18 (N.D. Cal.

Ex parte Keisuki Sata

215 F. 173 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 20, 1914

As to whether or not the disease was contracted on board the vessel while en route or whether just before leaving Japan it would be impossible for me to say because I do not know the definite period of incubation in this … Surgeon, V. H. S.”

United States Ex Rel. Hansen v. Cargill, Inc.

107 F. Supp. 2d 1172 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 24, 2000

Biddle v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford, Jr. University, 147 F.3d 821, 828 (9th Cir.1998). C. … Barth v.