Case law

Smith v. Diaz

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 18, 2022

In addition, procedural due process requires that 6 the findings of the prison disciplinary board be supported by “some evidence” in the record. … Brown v. Amis, No. 16-CV-00603-HSG (PR), 2018 WL 3159224, at *2 (N.D. Cal. June 3 28, 2018) (citing Dilley v. Gunn, 64 F.3d 1365, 1368-69 (9th Cir. 1995) and Alvarez v.

Jayaraman v. Oakland Unified School District

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 12, 2020

Melendres v. Arpaio, 695 F.3d 990, 997 (9th Cir. 2012) (quoting City of Los Angeles v. Lyons, 461 U.S. 95, 109 (1983)). … Anthony List v. Driehaus, 573 U.S. 149, 158 (2014); Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc., 528 U.S. 167, 190 (2000); Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms, 561 U.S. 139 (2010).

Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.

281 F. Supp. 2d 1149 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 21, 2003

See Woodbridge v. United States, 263 U.S. 50 , 44 S.Ct. 45 , 68 L.Ed. 159 (1923); Webster Electric Co. v. Splitdorf Electrical Co., 264 U.S. 463 , 44 S.Ct. 342 , 68 L.Ed. 792 (1924); Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. … See A C Aukerman v.

Geary v. Renne

708 F. Supp. 278 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 27, 1988

As the United States Supreme Court stated in Buckley v. … As the Court observed in Monitor Patriot v.

Lax v. Toyota Motor Corp.

65 F. Supp. 3d 772 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 14, 2014

Lou v. Belzberg, 834 F.2d at 739 . … In Brown v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co., 2014 WL 715082 , 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19414 , Case No. 13-05205 YGR (N.D.Cal.

Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of Berkeley

146 F. Supp. 2d 1081 · District Court, N.D. California · May 23, 2001

See Big Country Foods, Inc. v. Board of Educ. of Anchorage School Dist., 868 F.2d 1085, 1087 (9th Cir.1989). … .”); Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. FCC, 19 F.3d 1475 , 1480 (D.C.Cir.1994); In re Federal-State Joint Board on Univ.

BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION v. United States

203 F. Supp. 152 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 9, 1962

See also Judge-Hand’s opinion in Johnston v. … Freuler v. Helvering, 291 U.S. 35 at 42 , 54 S.Ct. 308 at 311 , 78 L.Ed. 634 (1934) ; Polt v. C. I. R. (2nd Cir. 1956), 233 F.2d 893 .

United States v. Pico

27 F. Cas. 532 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 30, 1859

S. v. … In the case of Larkin v. U.

International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 6 v. Cutter Laboratories

552 F. Supp. 979 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 22, 1982

In pertinent part, the agreement provides that: The decision of the Arbitrator or the Arbitration Board shall be final and binding upon the parties and any expenses of the arbitration shall be shared equally by the parties … See, e.g., International Association of Machinists v. Texas Steel, 538 F.2d 1116 , (5th Cir.1976). See also, District 50, U.M.W. v. Bowman Transportation, 421 F.2d 934 (5th Cir.1970); Painters, Local 756 v.

Quiroz v. Short

85 F. Supp. 3d 1092 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 31, 2015

Freeman v. City of Santa Ana, 68 F.3d 1180, 1188 (9th Cir.1995) (citing Board of Directors of Rotary Int’l v. Rotary Club, 481 U.S. 537, 545 , 107 S.Ct. 1940 , 95 L.Ed.2d 474 (1987) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Cleveland Board of Education v.

Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Codding

501 F. Supp. 155 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 23, 1980

For example, Bledsoe v. … As the Supreme Court opined in Virginia Pharmacy Board v.

Walker & Zanger, Inc. v. Paragon Industries, Inc.

465 F. Supp. 2d 956 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 1, 2006

[Plaintiffs] concept boards are a smaller-scale, portable version of the same idea * * *. … [Plaintiffs] library boards [demonstrate] the concept-oriented product lines that are unique to it [including] samples of the tiles that make up a particular product line.

In Re Utstarcom, Inc. Securities Litigation

617 F. Supp. 2d 964 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 27, 2009

Son also co-founded UTSI and served as UTSI’s Chairman of the Board from October 1995 to March 2003, and as a director until September 15, 2004. (Id. ¶ 35.) … UTSI reported in its 2002 Form 10-K that Son was Softbank’s designee on UTSI’s Board of Directors and that Son signed UTSI’s Forms 10-K for 2002 and 2003. (Id.)

Baer v. Baer

450 F. Supp. 481 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 14, 1978

McClellan, 490 F.2d 859 (5th Cir. 1974) (conspiring to enter a default judgment); Brown v. Dunne, 409 F.2d 341 (7th Cir. 1969) (petitioning for a conservatorship order); Weisser v. … In Brown v. Dunne, 409 F.2d 341 (7th Cir. 1969), the plaintiff alleged defendants had fraudulently petitioned for and obtained a state court order appointing one of them as conservator for plaintiff’s client.

Santos v. County of Humboldt

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 18, 2023

Chunie v. … See 42 U.S.C. § 12132; see also Brown v. 1 broadly and not limited to such actions as discharges, transfers, or demotions. See Lyons v. 2 England, 307 F.3d 1092, 1118 (9th Cir. 2002).

In Re Worlds of Wonder Securities Litigation

721 F. Supp. 1140 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 6, 1989

See Fine v. Rubin, 623 F.Supp. 171, 172-3 (N.D.Cal.1985). … Semegen v. Weidner, 780 F.2d 727, 733 (9th Cir.1985). 3 .

Gonzalez v. Chappell

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 18, 2024

First, state parole board officials have absolute quasi-judicial immunity when they act to grant, deny or revoke parole, because such actions are functionally comparable to those of judges. Sellars v. … Procunier, 641 F.2d 1295, 1302-04 (9th Cir. 1981) (“parole board officials are entitled to absolute immunity from suits by prisoners for actions taken when processing parole applications”); Anderson v.

Sheet Metal Workers Pension Trust of Northern California v. Bay Area HVAC, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · May 30, 2020

Longshoremen v. Davis, 476 U.S. 380, 391 (1986); Ethridge v. Harbor House Restaurant, 861 F.2d 1389, 1401 (9th Cir. 1988). … The Board has carved out an exception to this general rule for collective bargaining during the term of a Section 8(f) pre-hire contract, but the Board hasn’t extended Section 8(b)(3) to negotiations for the initial pre-hire

Unique v. Claybaugh

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 7, 2022

Bearchild v. … Comm'rs. of Bryan 19 Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v. City of Oakland, 47 20 F.3d 1522, 1534 (9th Cir. 1995).

Major v. Ferdon

325 F. Supp. 1141 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 25, 1971

See Dombrowski v. Pfister, cit. supra note 3 at 484 (note 2); compare Cole v. Graybeal, 313 F.Supp. 48 (D.C.1970); Eve Productions, Inc. v. Shannon, 312 F.Supp. 26 (D.C.1970); Wilson v. … absence of specific language in that statute taking suits brought thereunder outside the purview of § 2283, this Court will follow those of its predecessors who have held that the Civil Rights Act provides no across the board