Case law

Computer Place, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

607 F. Supp. 822 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 22, 1984

CPI contends that the relevant market is the technical/professional sub-market. 11 *833 The standards for defining product markets and submarkets were set forth in Brown Shoe Co. v. … CPI relies on this evidence to establish a technical/professional submarket but it has failed to produce evidence of the practical indicia required by Brown.

Maslic v. ISM Vuzem d.o.o.

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 2024

a 12 All counsel of record for Defendant Eisenmann Corporation have withdrawn from v 14 || representation with leave of the Court. See Orders, ECF 103, 108. … ORDERED TO SHOW = 17 || CAUSE, in writing and within 30 days, why its answer should not be stricken and default entered Z 18 || against it. 19 Defendant Eisenmann Corporation’s prior counsel, Frost Brown

Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

799 F. Supp. 1006 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 10, 1992

It should be emphasized that Shaw confines its holding to suits involving literary works, or arguably the literary aspects of works, see Brown Bag v. … Telemarketing Resources v. Symantec Corp., 12 USPQ2d 1991, 1989 WL 200350 (N.D.Cal.1989), aff’d in part as Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465 (9th Cir.1992).

Perry v. Schwarzenegger

704 F. Supp. 2d 921 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 4, 2010

.”); Cleveland Board of Education v. … Massachusetts Board of Retirement v.

DoDots Licensing Solutions LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 16, 2024

Co., Ltd. 16 v. Dodots Licensing Sols. LLC, No. IPR2023-00621, 2023 WL 6633786 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 11, 2023); 17 Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd. v. Dodots Licensing Sols. LLC, No. … The standard is simplification of the district court case, not complete elimination of it 7 by the [Patent Trial and Appeal Board].” Finjan, Inc. v. Symantec Corp., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1032, 8 1036 (N.D.

Sternberg

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 30, 2025

See Coronavirus Rep. v. … See Buchheit v.

Shishido v. SIU-Pacific District-PMA Pension Plan

587 F. Supp. 112 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 22, 1983

Board of Trustees, 542 F.2d 1128 , 1131 (9th Cir.1976) or deprives them of vested benefits because of an involuntary break in employment. Lee v. Nesbit, 453 F.2d 1309, 1311-12 (9th Cir.1972). … For example, in Steele v.

Coffee Dan's, Inc. v. Coffee Don's Charcoal Broiler

305 F. Supp. 1210 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 22, 1969

See Sunbeam Lighting Co. v. Sunbeam Corporation, 183 F.2d 969, 973 , (9th Cir. 1950). In Faciane v. … Eried to a Golden Brown......1.35 FRESH JUMBO LOUISIANA SHRIMP (Pour), Snappy Sauce ... 1.75 BROILED HALIBUT STEAK Tartar Sauce .................. 1.65 SEA FOOD COMBINATION: Shrimp, Scallops, Fried Clams .... 1.75 3 , 4 .

Pearce v. Club Med Sales, Inc.

172 F.R.D. 407 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 16, 1997

Rubio v. … Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. University v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County (1981) 119 Cal. App.3d 516, 525 , 174 Cal.Rptr. 160 .

Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp.

80 F.R.D. 626 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 6, 1978

Applying the holding of Franchise Realty, in which the “governmental body” was the Board of Permit Appeals, to a situation involving allegedly sham lawsuits, the district court in Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. … Toensigg v. Brown, 528 F.2d 69, 72 (9th Cir. 1975). We note also, however, that count VII, which conclusionally alleges predatory pricing, would be deficient for reasons stated earlier.

New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility v. County of Marin California

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 19, 2021

Reg’l Planning Comm’n v. … Tower Assets, LLC v.

Ferry v. De Longhi America Inc.

276 F. Supp. 3d 940 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 16, 2017

See Perry v. Brown, 725 F.3d 968, 970 (9th Cir. 2013) (dissolving the stay of the district court’s order enjoining enforcement of Proposition 8). … In Mueller v.

Morse-Starrett Products Co. v. Steccone

86 F. Supp. 796 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 25, 1949

See Dodge Stationery Co. v. … Rowley Co. v. Rowley, 3 Cir., 18 F.2d 700 ; Chickering v. Chickering & Sons, 7 Cir., 215 F. 490 ; Bates Mfg. Co. v. Bates Numbering Mach. Co., C.C., 172 F. 892 ; J. A. Dougherty’s Sons v.

Bois v. Levi Strauss & Co.

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 22, 2023

, Case No. 23-cv-02772-TLT (AGT) 8 Plaintiff, DISCOVERY ORDER v. … Id. at 9; see Brown v. 5 Google, LLC, No. 4:20-cv-03664-YGR, 2022 WL 2289059, at *1 (N.D. Cal.

Clark v. Commission on Judicial Performance

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2023

C 22-6171 JSC; Clark v. Medical Board of California, et al., No. C 22- 6174 JSC; Clark v. Alameda Cty. Dep’t. of Child Protected Services, et al., No. … See Clark v. Medical Board of California, et al., No C 22-6174 JSC.

Beijing Tong Ren Tang (Usa) Corp. v. Trt USA Corp.

676 F. Supp. 2d 857 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 18, 2009

KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc., 408 F.3d 596, 608 (9th Cir.2005) (citing AMF v. Sleekcraft Boats, 599 F.2d 341, 348-49 (9th Cir.1979)). … Resolutions of the First Board of Directors Meeting” but he refused. Id. (the document is attached to Zhou Reply Decl. Ex. C).

In re Karlsson

302 F. Supp. 628 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 7, 1969

Hamilton v. United States, 268 F.15 (4th Cir. 1920), or until formally discharged. … Humes v. Alaska Transp. Co., 180 F.2d 534 (9th Cir. 1950); England v. United States, Civil No. 16347 (W.D.Wash., filed November 24, 1958). .

Mesquite Lake Associates v. Lurgi Corp.

754 F. Supp. 161 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 2, 1991

See Volt Information Sciences, Inc. v. Board of Trustees, 489 U.S. 468 , 109 S.Ct. 1248 , 103 L.Ed.2d 488 (1989); Perry v. Thomas, 482 U.S. 483 , 107 S.Ct. 2520 , 96 L.Ed.2d 426 (1987); Moses H. Cone Mem. Hosp. v. … Kakiuchi & Co., Inc., 815 F.2d 840 (2d Cir.1987); Zolezzi v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 789 F.2d 1447 (9th Cir.1986); Bayma v.

Cellulose Material Solutions, LLC v. SC Marketing Group, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 18, 2023

Slovensky v. Friedman, 142 Cal. App. 17 4th 1518, 1528 (2006). … Cardinale as a named inventor,” and state-law claims premised on a determination 21 of inventorship are preempted under 35 U.S.C. § 256.9 Brown v. Brown, No. CV 13-03318 SI, 22 2013 WL 5947032, at *7 (N.D. Cal.

Sherrill v. Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling

615 F. Supp. 1021 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 9, 1985

The crew of the Brinkerhoff I lived on board the vessel and rotated their time on and time off in two-week increments. … Any other witnesses or persons who were on board the PT Airfast plan that crashed who reside in Singapore, and any other witnesses or persons who worked in supervisory or responsible capacities on board the BRINKERHOFF I