Case law

LINDA M. FREDRICK V. ANDREW SAUL

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 3, 2022

Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492. … Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 488-89 (9th Cir. 2015).

Van Wagner v. Court of Master Sommeliers, Americas

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 28, 2023

See Whittlestone, Inc. v. … Kudokas v. Balkus, 26 Cal. App. 3d 744, 750 (1972); see also 17 Hasso v. Hapke, 227 Cal.

Doe v. Deutsche Lufthansa Aktiengesellschaft

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 29, 2024

Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 26 919 (2011) (quoting Int’l Shoe, 326 U.S. at 317). … See Bassidji v.

California Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. Marsh

687 F. Supp. 495 · District Court, N.D. California · May 11, 1988

The Corps is held to a strict standard of compliance with NEPA [Friends of the River v. F.E.R.C., 720 F.2d 93 , 110 (D.C.Cir.1983), quoting Calvert Cliffs’ Coord. Comm. v. … United States, 615 F.2d 498, 500 (9th Cir.1980), quoting City of Davis v. Coleman, 521 F.2d 661, 673 (9th Cir.1975) quoting, Save Our Ten Acres v. Kreger, 472 F.2d 463, 467 (5th Cir.1973)].

Vackar v. Package MacHinery Co.

841 F. Supp. 310 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 28, 1993

See Antonovich v. … See Stockton Newspapers v. Superior Court, 206 Cal.App.3d 966 , 979 n. 3, 254 Cal.Rptr. 389 (1988), disapproved on other grounds in Brown v.

Mehedi v. View, Inc. f/k/a CF Finance Acquisition Corp. II

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 12, 2024

See, e.g., Brown v. Medtronic, Inc., 628 F.3d 451, 455 (8th Cir. 2010); 1 223, 237 (S.D.N.Y. 2012); In re Infineon Techs. AG Sec. Litig., 266 F.R.D. 386, 398 (N.D. Cal. 2 2009); In re Impax Lab’ys, Inc. Sec. … The Court finds Brown v. Medtronic 13 instructive.

Peterson v. Sutter Medical Foundation

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 2, 2022

The Ninth Circuit has held that the MBC’s predecessor 3 board was an agency of the state for purposes of sovereign immunity. Forster v. Cty. of Santa 4 Barbara, 896 F.2d 1146, 1149 (9th Cir. 1990). … Vess v.

New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility v. County of Marin California

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 18, 2021

MetroPCS, Inc. v. … Tower Corp. v.

United States v. McNeil

357 F. Supp. 342 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 9, 1973

. § 462(a), to wit: failure to keep his local board informed of a current address and refusal to report for induction. … Hamer v. United States, 259 F.2d 274, 279 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. den. 359 U.S. 916 , 79 S.Ct. 592 , 3 L.Ed.2d 577 reh. den., 359 U.S. 962 , 79 S.Ct. 799 , 3 L.Ed.2d 769 (1959).

Celestine v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.

729 F. Supp. 691 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 21, 1989

Polizzi v. M/V ZEPHYROS II MONROVIA, 860 F.2d 147, 149 (5th Cir.1988). Celestine surely should have seen a large coil of cable lying on the winch deck in broad daylight. … In Davis v. Partenreederei M.S.

Ganz v. City of Belvedere

739 F. Supp. 507 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 29, 1990

Sederquist, supra, at 281 ; Rancho Palos Verdes Corp. v. City of Laguna Beach, 547 F.2d 1092 (9th Cir.1976); Canton v. Spokane School Dist., 498 F.2d 840, 845 (9th Cir. 1974). … England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411, 421-22 , 84 S.Ct. 461, 467-68 , 11 L.Ed.2d 440 (1964); Sederquist, supra.

Eisner v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 28, 2024

Fund v. … See Rubke v.

Eric P. v. Directors Guild of America

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 19, 2019

Harlick v. … See also Madden v.

Colon v. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco

538 F. Supp. 498 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 8, 1982

In Ficek v. … Alexander v.

NGV Gaming, Ltd. v. Upstream Point Molate, LLC

355 F. Supp. 2d 1061 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 31, 2005

See, e.g., Brown v. U.S., 86 F.3d 1554 , 1562 (Fed.Cir.1996). Because no Indian trust lands had been acquired during the period of time relevant to Plaintiffs claim, no leasing transactions had been instigated. … Cobell v. Norton, 246 F.Supp.2d 59, 62 (D.D.C.2003) (quoting Ryan v.

United States v. 263.5 Acres of Land, more or less, Marin County

54 F. Supp. 692 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 28, 1944

In re Board of Supervisors, Co.Ct., 6 N.Y.S.2d 732 . … The same conclusion was reached by the Supreme Court of New Hampshire in State v. Federal Square Corporation, 89 N.H. 538 , 3 A.2d 109, 114 .

Jones

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 29, 2026

Rule 4’s purpose “is ‘to eliminate the costs of service of a 18 summons on many parties and to foster cooperation among adversaries and counsel.’ ” Estate v. 19 Darulis v. … USA, Inc. v. Bonita Pearl Inc., 686 F.

Kucharczyk v. Regents of the University of California

946 F. Supp. 1419 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 11, 1996

Joint Council of Interns and Residents v. Board of Supervisors, 210 Cal.App.3d 1202, 1210 , 258 Cal.Rptr. 762 (1989). … Shapell Indus., Inc. v. Governing Board, 1 Cal.App.4th 218, 233 , 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 818 (1991).

Aviv v. Szulczewski

District Court, N.D. California · May 4, 2022

United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri‑State Pension Fund v. Zuckerberg, 262 A.3d 1034, 1058 (Del. 2021). … In short, Aviv contends that Wish’s board of directors allowed the company to “create a public and private nuisance” by violating “relevant zoning ordinances.”

Feldman v. Simkins Industries, Inc.

492 F. Supp. 839 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 19, 1980

He was not a controlling shareholder, however; he did not even have representation on the board of directors and it is not contended that he had access to any non-public corporate information. … SEC v.