Case law

United States v. Dunifer

997 F. Supp. 1235 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 16, 1998

Meredith Corp. v. … Waters, 55 F.3d 421, 425 (9th Cir.1995) (explaining prior cases incorrectly stated that the Board of Immigration Appeals lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate constitutional issues and that Board lacks jurisdiction only to determine

Application of Woods

154 F. Supp. 932 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 31, 1957

The judgment and conviction were affirmed on appeal (See People v. … Burford, 339 U.S. 200 , 70 S.Ct. 587 , 94 L.Ed. 761 ; Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 ; and Application of Meek, D.C., 138 F.Supp. 327 ).

Welsh v. City and County of San Francisco

887 F. Supp. 1293 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 20, 1995

In Bradshaw v. … Skibo v. City of New York, 109 F.R.D. 58, 61 (E.D.N.Y.1985) (ordering disclosure of files of civilian complaint review board concerning complaints against officers).

Firsov

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 27, 2026

Crowley v. Bannister, 734 F.3d 967, 974–75 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting Travelers 19 Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am. v. Brenneke, 551 F.3d 1132, 1135 (9th Cir. 2009)). … Jan. 7, 2026) (citing Brown v.

M. v. County of San Mateo

District Court, N.D. California · Jan 9, 2020

Chew v. … Reese v.

Waymo LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

256 F. Supp. 3d 1059 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 8, 2017

Code § 3426.7 ; Silvaco Data Sys. v. Intel Corp., 184 Cal.App.4th 210, 236 , 109 Cal.Rptr.3d 27 (2010), disapproved on other grounds by Kwikset Corp. v. … In an attempt to get around Silvaco , Waymo argues that Kremen v.

Tran

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 10, 2026

A shareholder alleging derivative claims must plead specific 26 facts showing why a pre-suit demand on the board would have been futile. Aronson v. … Rales v. Blasband, 17 634 A.2d 927, 934 (Del. 1993); see also United Food & Commercial Workers Union 18 v.

In re Google Assistant Privacy Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 3, 2023

Kamakana v. City and Cnty. Of 21 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 22 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). … June 1, 2020) (noting that courts 22 have found “confidential business information” in the form of “business strategies” sealable under 23 the compelling reasons standard); Brown v. Brown, No.

Borzello v. Charles D. Sooy & C. Darrell Sooy

427 F. Supp. 332 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 24, 1977

. § 1461 et seq., as amended, and is engaged in carrying out activities authorized by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board, this suit necessarily arises under the laws of the United States. … Mamber v. Second Federal Savings, 275 F.Supp. 170, 171 (D.Mass. 1967); Austin v. Altman, 332 F.2d 273, 276 (2d Cir. 1964).

Boston Retirement System v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 19, 2023

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Ltd, 282 F.R.D. 259, 263 (N.D. … Mar. 6, 2014); see also 13 Hunt v. Cont’l Cas. Co., No. 13-cv-05966-HSG, 2015 WL 1518067, at *2 (N.D. Cal.

Chandler v. United States

312 F. Supp. 1263 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 11, 1970

Most of these cases, however (e. g., Connell, itself; also Brown v. Vinson, *1267 188 Tenn. 120 , 216 S.W.2d 748 (1949); Moore's Adm'r v. Marshall, 302 Ky. 729 , 196 S.W.2d 369 (1946); Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. … In Yiatchos v.

Fisher

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 14, 2026

. § 1441(a); Caterpillar, Inc. v. … Brady v. Brown, 51 F.3d 810, 815 (9th Cir. 1995) 8 (presence of United States citizen domiciled in Mexico).

Gerald Len Cooley, Jr. v. William Jeha

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 1, 2021

See Costanich v. … See Caldwell v.

Love v. Motion Industries, Inc.

309 F. Supp. 2d 1128 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 8, 2004

British Airways Board. v. Boeing Co., 585 F.2d 946, 950-52 (9th Cir.1978). It is not enough for the responding party to point to the mere allegations or denials contained in the pleadings. … See, e.g., Rivera v.

Cisneros v. United States

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 29, 2020

See United States v. Brown, 415 F. Supp. 3d 901, 904 (N.D. Cal. 2019). 20 I. … See id. at *2; see also Brown, 415 F.

Nieto v. Allison

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 8, 2023

Ashcroft v. … Leer v.

Kucharczyk v. Regents of the University of California

946 F. Supp. 1419 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 11, 1996

Joint Council of Interns and Residents v. Board of Supervisors, 210 Cal.App.3d 1202, 1210 , 258 Cal.Rptr. 762 (1989). … Shapell Indus., Inc. v. Governing Board, 1 Cal.App.4th 218, 233 , 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 818 (1991).

Burns v. City of Concord

99 F. Supp. 3d 1007 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 9, 2015

See Bd. of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 ; Fuller v. City of Oakland, 47 F.3d 1522, 1534 (9th Cir.1995). … Board of Comm’rs of Bryan County. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

Sifuentes v. Andes

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 10, 2025

. § 2244(b)(2); Brown v. … See Brown v.

Applestein v. Medivation, Inc.

861 F. Supp. 2d 1030 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 22, 2012

Co. v. … CW-2 is described as “a shareholder of Orgánica and a member of Organica’s Board.” TAC ¶ 69.