Case law

Van Vranken v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

901 F. Supp. 294 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 16, 1995

In re Domestic Air Transp., 148 F.R.D. at 350-51 ; See, e.g., In re Gypsum Cases, 386 F.Supp. 959 (N.D.Cal.1974) (awarding 12.35 percent of $75 million fund), *298 aff'd 565 F.2d 1123 (9th Cir.1977); Brown v. … See Behrens v.

Easton v. Wells Fargo & Company

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 6, 2020

Jan. 6, 2017); Brown v. Abercrombie & 27 1 Fitch Co., No. 4:13-cv-05205 YGR, 2014 WL 715082, at *2 (N.D. Cal. … Id.; Brown, 2014 WL 715082, at *4; Arreola v. Finish Line, No. 14- 3 CV-03339-LHK, 2014 WL 6982571, at *9 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2014).

Hussey v. United States

271 F. Supp. 650 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 24, 1965

On the dates shown in Exhibit A-Y (attached to complaint) the Temporary Authorities Board of the Commission issued orders granting the applications for periods not to exceed 180 days. 1 Various petitions for reconsideration … Co. v. United States, 245 U.S. 463, 466 , 38 S.Ct. 141 , 62 L.Ed. 400 ; United States v. Jones, 336 U.S. 641, 673 , 69 S.Ct. 787 , 93 L.Ed. 938 (1949). Cf. Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v.

Moore v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 7, 2024

et al., Case No. 23-cv-05011-BLF 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER APPOINTING INTERIM 9 v. … In particular, proposed interim class counsel 6 || have devoted considerable time and resources over the past three years to investigating and 7 || litigating Browning v. Am.

Translarity, Inc. v. Grand Junction Semiconductor Pte. Ltd.

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 29, 2024

Marassa and Wang told Schmidt and Brown that working 9 with ZiFund and Alpha would guarantee payment of significant back due amounts owed to 10 Translarity, Schmidt, and Brown, and that they would never get paid … Simula, Inc. v. Autoliv, Inc., 175 F.3d 716, 721 (9th Cir. 1999); see also Chiron 19 Corp. v.

Tidwell

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 30, 2025

See Parks Sch. of Bus., Inc. v. … The 16 Ninth Circuit held that members of state medical boards are entitled to absolute immunity for 17 actions undertaken in connection with disciplinary proceedings, and the medical boards’ staff 18 investigators

Retail Shoe & Textile Salesmen's Union, Local 410 v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

185 F. Supp. 558 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 29, 1960

In Steelworkers v. … See also, Grunwald-Marx, Inc. v. Los Angeles Joint Board, 52 Cal.2d 568 , at page 580, 343 P.2d 23 .

Cupp v. ABC-Amega, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 26, 2025

See Brown 18 v. Transworld Systems, Inc., 73 F.4th 1030, 1040 (9th Cir. 2023); see also 15 U.S.C. 1692k(d); 19 Poorsina v. Peak Foreclosure Servs., Inc., 2021 WL 308609, at *3 (N.D. Cal. … Feb. 24, 2017) (citing Brown v. Collections Bureau of Am., Ltd., 183 F. 13 Supp. 3d 1004, 1005 (N.D. Cal. 2016)).

Roofers Local Union No. 81 v. Wedge Roofing, Inc.

811 F. Supp. 1398 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 11, 1992

See Local 9, International Union of Operating Engineers v. Siegrist Constr. … See Board of Trustees v. Udovch, 771 F.Supp. 1044 (N.D.Cal.1991).

Metaxas v. Gateway Bank F.S.B.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 26, 2022

See also Harlick v. … See Pickern v. Pier 1 25 Imps.

Wenderhold v. Cylink Corp.

191 F.R.D. 600 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 4, 2000

See Wenderhold v. Cylink Corp., 188 F.R.D. 577 (N.D.Cal.1999). Although seven law firms had sought to participate in the consortium, only one firm — Abbey, Gardy & Squitieri— submitted a bid. See Wenderhold v. … As the class recovery comparison shows, Innelli & Molder is the “high” bidder; the class stands to recover more under Innelli’s proposal almost across the board.

Fernandez v. Davis

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 4, 2025

Nov. 13, 2018); Brown v. Basher, C No. 10- 2 cv-0479, 2012 WL 639446 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2012); Wallace v. Haythorne, C No. 06-cv-1697, 3 2007 WL 3010755, at *2-4 (E.D. Cal. 2007); Wallace v. … First, 17 Frost v.

Wisk Aero LLC v. Archer Aviation Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 7, 2022

The disputed excerpts are: 1) a single sentence within a 38-page slide deck 16 presented to Wisk’s Board of Managers, dated November 2, 2020 (the “November 2020 Board 17 Deck”); 2) a set of comments to the November … Aug. 11, 2022) ¶ 2, Exs. 1 at -615 (Nov. 20 2020 Board Deck); 2 at -194 (Comments to Board Deck); 3 at -822-823 (June 2021 Funding 21 Request).]1 22

True Gentlemen's Jerky, Inc. v. 1K1V TGJ Holdings, LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 7, 2023

See Apple Inc. v. Superior Court, 18 Cal. App. 5th 222, 254 (2017); Bader v. Anderson, 179 Cal. … still give] 1K1V … a 3/5 board majority.”

Sazerac Co. v. Fetzer Vineyards, Inc.

265 F. Supp. 3d 1013 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 19, 2017

LLC v. … See *1038 Star Indus., Inc. v.

Corns v. Laborers International Union

62 F. Supp. 3d 1105 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 29, 2014

Hummel v. … See Barnes v.

In Re Finjan Holdings, Inc. Securities Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 13, 2021

See, 20 e.g., Kalnit v. … Glazer Cap. 4 Mgmt., LP v.

Bailey v. Zendesk, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 24, 2024

Walker v. … Zucco Partners, 2 LLC v. Digimarc Corp., 552 F.3d 981, 991 (9th Cir. 2009). In Tellabs, Inc. v.

O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

82 F. Supp. 3d 1133 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 11, 2015

Co. v. Workers’ Comp. … Fund v. Brown, 32 Cal.App.4th 188, 202-203 , 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 98 (1995) (noting that “truck driving — while perhaps not a skilled *1153 craft — requires abilities beyond those possessed by a general laborer”).

Boyd

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 10, 2026

Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 352 (1943)). … Sanders v. Brown, 504 F.3d 903, 915 (9th Cir. 2007) (citing 7 Charley’s Taxi Radio Dispatch Corp. v. SIDA of Hawaii, Inc., 810 F.2d 869, 876 (9th Cir. 1987) 8 and Deak-Perera Hawaii, Inc. v.