Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.83s

  • In re Certain Chinese Family Benevolent & District Ass'n

    19 F.R.D. 97 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 20, 1956

    Co. v. … American Tobacco Co., 264 U.S. 298 , 44 S.Ct. 336 , 68 L.Ed. 696 ; Brown v. United States, 276 U.S. 134 , 48 S.Ct. 288 , 72 L.Ed. 500 ; Oklahoma Press Pub. Co. v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Duke v. San Francisco Community College District

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 11, 2021

    Weil v. … Co. v. Superior Court, 155 Cal. App. 4th 27 1485, 1503 (2007) for this proposition, but that case does not even address the Brown Act. 1 this case.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Talmadge

    80 B.R. 499 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 22, 1986

    .’_ ‘The problems of government are practical ones and may justify, if they do not require, rough accommodations — illogical, it may be, and unscientific.’ ” Railroad Retirement Board v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Salhotra v. Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 12, 2022

    Brown’s testimony 21 and issues involving Plaintiffs’ warranty and UCL-unfairness prong claims. … See Brown v. Wal-Mart 22 Stores, Inc., Case No. 09-cv-3339-EJD, 2012 WL 5818300, at *4 (N.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • James v. Equicor, Inc.

    791 F. Supp. 804 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 24, 1992

    In Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. … v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • City & County of San Francisco v. Tutor-Saliba Corp.

    218 F.R.D. 219 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 2, 2003

    Envirofuels Marketing, Inc., 1996 WL 445070 (D.Kan.1996) and Colombini v. Members of the Board of Dirs. of the Empire College School of Law, 2001 WL 1006785 , 2001 U.S. Dist. Lexis 13405 (N.D.Cal.2001). … See Bullard v. Roadway Exp., 3 Fed.Appx. 418, 420 (6th Cir.2001) (unpublished). See also U.S. v.

    Cited 62 timesPublished
  • Vieux v. County of Alameda

    695 F. Supp. 1023 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 29, 1987

    H and I, respectively (County Board Resolutions). … See Perley v. Board of Supervisors of Calaveras County, 137 Cal.App.3d 424 , 433 n. 4, 187 Cal.Rptr. 53 (1982).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Shaterian v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

    829 F. Supp. 2d 873 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 7, 2011

    In 2003, Shaterian purchased a home located at 511 Browning Court, Mill Valley, California. ECF No. 56 (“SAC”) ¶ 9. … Brown, 186 Cal.App.2d 425, 431 , 8 Cal.Rptr. 917 (Cal.Ct.App.1960)). In the instant action, Shaterian has not pled a benefit conferred or prejudice suffered.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • In Re APPLE COMPUTER SECURITIES LITIGATION

    672 F. Supp. 1552 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 19, 1987

    Anderson v. … V.

    Modified by In Re Apple Computer Securities Litigation, 886 F.2d 1109 (1989)Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Airlines For America v. City and County of San Francisco

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 25, 2025

    Hunt v. … Workers Union Loc. 751 v. Brown Grp., Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 555 11 (1996).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Williams v. The NFL Player Supplemental Disability Plan

    District Court, N.D. California · Jan 3, 2020

    The Ninth Circuit explained and concluded as follows: 17 We review the Board’s decision for abuse of discretion, because the Plan grants discretion to the Board. Jebian v. Hewlett-Packard Co. … Richardson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Hartnell

    26 F. Cas. 195 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 15, 1856

    S. v. Larkin. 18 How. [59 U. … It is enough, however, to say that in the case alluded to (that of Petaluma) the decision of the board was affirmed by this court without examination, and on the statement of the district attorney in open court, that no valid

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kinman v. United States

    139 F. Supp. 925 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 9, 1956

    In Utz v. … Proc., 356; Wolf v. Gall, 174 Cal. 140, 145 , 162 P. 115 ; Hutchinson v. Ainsworth, 73 Cal. 452 , 15 P. 82 , 2 Am.St.Rep. 823 ; Hoff v. Funkenstein, 54 Cal. 233 ; Union Collection Co. v.

    Overruled by Dorothy Smith v. United States, 873 F.2d 218 (1989)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cameranesi v. U.S. Department of Defense

    941 F. Supp. 2d 1173 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 22, 2013

    Yonemoto v. … In addition, the WHINSEC Board of Visitors provides external oversight of WHINSEC’s performance.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Holt v. Facebook, Inc.

    240 F. Supp. 3d 1021 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 9, 2017

    Brown v. … .”): Frisby v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Metaxas v. Gateway Bank F.S.B.

    District Court, N.D. California · Aug 26, 2022

    See also Harlick v. … See Pickern v. Pier 1 25 Imps.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re: Wells Fargo & Company Stockholder Derivative Litigation

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 4, 2022

    See Cohen v. … have failed to show that at least half of the members of the Demand Board face 15 a substantial likelihood of liability under Count V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Yuba Consolidated Industries, Inc.

    260 F. Supp. 930 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 23, 1966

    Securities and Exchange Comm. v. … In Chicago and West Towns Railways, Inc. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Klein v. Ellison

    District Court, N.D. California · May 24, 2021

    See Kamen v. Kemper Fin. Servs., Inc., 21 500 U.S. 90, 108-09 (1991); see also Rosenbloom v. … Fund v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Moran v. Peralta Community College District

    825 F. Supp. 891 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 22, 1993

    INTRODUCTION Defendants Peralta Community College District (the “District”) and various named employees and board members of the District (collectively, the “moving defendants”) seek partial judgment on' the pleadings, 1 … Co. v. Dedeaux, 481 U.S. 41, 52 , 107 S.Ct. 1549, 1555 , 95 L.Ed.2d 39 (1987); Tingey v. Pixley-Richard West, Inc., 953 F.2d 1124 , 1132-34 (9th Cir.1992).

    Abrogated on other grounds by Joseph A. Radici, Theresa A. Radici, Michelle E. Radici v. Associated Insurance Companies, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Indiana, 217 F.3d 737 (2000)Cited 11 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.