Case law

Western Pac. R. Corporation v. Western Pac. R. Co.

85 F. Supp. 868 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 6, 1949

See Van Schaick v. McCarthy, 10 Cir., 116 F.2d 987, 992 ; New England Coal & Coke Co. v. Rutland R. Co., 2 Cir., 143 F. 2d 179, 184 ; In re Denver & R. G. W. R. Co., 10 Cir., 150 F.2d 28, 34 ; Thompson v. … S. v. Isham, 17 Wall. 496 , 84 U.S. 496, 506 , 21 L.Ed. 728 ; Jones v. Helvering, 63 App.D.C. 204 , 71 F.2d 214, 217 ; Iowa Bridge Co. v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 39 F.2d 777, 781 ; Commissioner v.

Scramoge Technology Limited v. Apple Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 25, 2023

“A court is under no obligation to delay its own proceedings where parallel litigation is 21 pending before the [Patent Trial and Appeal Board].” Capella Photonics, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., 22 No. … In Verinata Health, the Board had instituted but not yet issued a final 10 decision on one of the plaintiff’s asserted patents. Verinata Health, Inc. v.

National Semiconductor Corp. v. Linear Technology Corp.

703 F. Supp. 845 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 13, 1988

(IEEE Publications Board Policies Pertaining to the Review of Papers). … See Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Monsanto Co., 59 F.R.D. 282 (C.D.Cal.1973); Jack Winter Inc. v. Koratron Co., 327 F.Supp. 206 (N.D.Cal. 1971); Laitram Corp. v. Deepsouth Packing Co., 279 F.Supp. 883 (E.D.La.1968).

San Francisco Baykeeper v. Sunnyvale

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 6, 2025

Brown v. Celgene Corp., No. 4 10-cv-3165, 2015 WL 12731823, at *2 (C.D. Cal. July 24, 2015) (quoting Russell v. Absolute 5 Collection Servs., Inc., 763 F.3d 385, 396 (4th Cir. 2014)). … Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc., 953 F.3d 567, 574 (9th Cir. 2020). Prejudice is the 21 most important of these factors. Id. 22 A.

Hussain

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). … Code § 17200 et seq.); id. at 5 (al- leging violations of the Ralph Brown Act, Cal. Gov’t Code § 54950 et seq.; and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 51).

Anderson v. Bowring & Co.

197 F. 675 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 18, 1911

It is not denied that upon June 15, 1907, the Germanicus was in every respect “ready” for delivery, and upon that day one Welcker, the charterers’ agent, boarding her at Victoria, directed her captain to proceed to Departure … empowered by the contract of hire to name the particular point of delivery, the term of hire did not commence to run until the owner delivered the vessel at the point selected, namely, the coaling wharf; and Anderson et al. v.

Tobin v. Grant

79 F. Supp. 975 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 30, 1948

B. v. Fainblatt, 306 U.S. 601 , 307 U.S. 609 , 59 S.Ct. 668 , 83 L. Ed. 1014 ; United States v. Darby, supra; Enterprise Box Company v. Fleming, 5 Cir., 125 F.2d 897 ; Wagner v. American Service Company, supra. … State Board of Equalization, 829 U.S. 69 , at page 84, 67 S.Ct. 156, 164 , 91 L.Ed. 80 .

Ibanez v. Electric Hydrogen Co.

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 30, 2024

Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 16 373 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. 2004). … Yuksel v. N. Am. Power Tech., Inc., 805 F. Supp. 310, 313 (E.D. Pa. 13 1992); see also GAF Bldg. Materials Corp. v. Elk Corp. of Dallas, 90 F.3d 479, 482 (Fed.

Greyhound Corp. v. United States

332 F. Supp. 44 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 5, 1971

Lowry of the firm of MeCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen and defendant was represented by James L. Browning, Jr., Esq. through Martin A. Schainbaum, Esq., Assistant United States Attorney. … On the other hand, the cases of Bulova Watch Company v. United States, 365 U.S. 753 , 81 S.Ct. 864 , 6 L.Ed.2d 72 (1961) and General Motors Corp., Frigidaire Div. v.

Hyundai America, Inc. v. Meissner & Wurst GmbH & Co.

26 F. Supp. 2d 1217 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 6, 1998

Robertson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 749 F.2d 530, 533-34 (9th Cir.1984)(citing 2A J. Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice V 12.08 at 2271 (2d ed.1982)). … Board of Trustees, 489 U.S. 468 , 109 S.Ct. 1248 , 103 L.Ed.2d 488 (1989) is misplaced.

Esa v. NortonLifeLock Incorporated

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 30, 2021

Sun v. … Cooper v.

San Francisco Baykeeper v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

219 F. Supp. 2d 1001 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 12, 2002

Citizens Against Toxic Sprays, Inc. v. Clark, 720 F.2d 1475 (9th Cir.1983); Or. Envtl. Council v. Kunzman, 714 F.2d 901 , 904 (9th Cir.1983); The Steamboaters v. Fed. … FWS’s focus on the least tern and brown pelican was not arbitrary and capricious.

Herring v. Kijakazi

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 26, 2023

Brown v. Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 20 443 (9th Cir. 1983). … Brown. However, Dr.

Taylor v. SSA Commissioner

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 14, 2025

Brown-Hunter v. 4 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492.

Sun Microsystems, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

87 F. Supp. 2d 992 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 24, 2000

See Sun Mi-crosystems, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 21 F.Supp.2d 1109, 1126 (N.D.Cal.1998). … F.T.C. v. Brown Shoe Co., 384 U.S. 316 , 86 S.Ct. 1501, 1504-5 , 16 L.Ed.2d 587 (1966) (quoting F.T.C. v. Motion Picture Advertising *1000 Service Co., 344 U.S. 392 , 73 S.Ct. 361, 363 , 97 L.Ed. 426 (1953)).

Sotoodeh v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 12, 2024

Wells Fargo Bank v. Superior Court, 53 Cal. 3d 7 1082, 1088 (1991) (citing Mackey v. Pioneer Nat. Bank, 867 F.2d 520, 526 (9th Cir. 1989)). … ) 6 (plaintiff “was an officer hired indirectly by the Board of Directors and thus could be terminated at 7 will”); Poching v.

Santos v. County of Humboldt

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 21, 2023

Chunie v. … v.

Preap v. Johnson

303 F.R.D. 566 · District Court, N.D. California · May 15, 2014

See FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132-33 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000) (citations omitted); see also United States v. … Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 132-33 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 .

United States v. Anderson Cottonwood Irr. Dist.

19 F. Supp. 740 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 26, 1937

Irving Trust Co. v. Frimitt (D.C.) 1 F.Supp. 16 . … Bannon v. Burnes (C.C.) 39 F. 892 ; United States v. Pierce County (D.C.) 193 F. 529 ; Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United States, supra.

Rai v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority

308 F.R.D. 245 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 24, 2015

See Lopez v. G.A.T. … Co. v.