Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
1.19s
San Francisco Baykeeper v. Sunnyvale
District Court, N.D. California · Jun 6, 2025
Brown v. Celgene Corp., No. 4 10-cv-3165, 2015 WL 12731823, at *2 (C.D. Cal. July 24, 2015) (quoting Russell v. Absolute 5 Collection Servs., Inc., 763 F.3d 385, 396 (4th Cir. 2014)). … Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc., 953 F.3d 567, 574 (9th Cir. 2020). Prejudice is the 21 most important of these factors. Id. 22 A.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWojciechowski v. Kohlberg Ventures, LLC
District Court, N.D. California · Apr 9, 2021
Anderson v. … Anderson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWirtz v. Local Union 262, Glass Bottle Blowers Ass'n
290 F. Supp. 965 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 26, 1968
Wirtz v. Local 125, Laborers’ Int’l. Union, 389 U.S. 477 , 88 S.Ct. 639 , 19 L.Ed.2d 716 (1968). … Absentee voting had been permitted in the union’s previous elections and a notice to that effect had been posted on a bulletin board before the 1962 election.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSanta Marina Co. v. Canadian Bank of Commerce
242 F. 142 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 24, 1916
Bank v. Conn. Mut. Rife Ins. Co., supra. … of Commissioners v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedWestern Pac. R. Corporation v. Western Pac. R. Co.
85 F. Supp. 868 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 6, 1949
See Van Schaick v. McCarthy, 10 Cir., 116 F.2d 987, 992 ; New England Coal & Coke Co. v. Rutland R. Co., 2 Cir., 143 F. 2d 179, 184 ; In re Denver & R. G. W. R. Co., 10 Cir., 150 F.2d 28, 34 ; Thompson v. … S. v. Isham, 17 Wall. 496 , 84 U.S. 496, 506 , 21 L.Ed. 728 ; Jones v. Helvering, 63 App.D.C. 204 , 71 F.2d 214, 217 ; Iowa Bridge Co. v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 39 F.2d 777, 781 ; Commissioner v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Aug 25, 2026
See Firsov v. Scandinavian Airlines Sys. Denmark-Norway- 20 Sweden, No. 25-CV-03691-EMC, 2026 WL 1805737, at *1, 8 (N.D. Cal. June 23, 2026). … .” 7 Wolgel v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUnisense Fertilitech v. Auxogyn, Inc.
896 F. Supp. 2d 822 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 14, 2012
Thereafter, the '906 Patent was assigned to the Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University, and then exclusively licensed to Auxogyn. (Complaint ¶¶ 14,15.) … .”); Benitec Australia, Ltd. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Oct 30, 2020
See United States v. Brown, 415 F. Supp. 3d 901, 904 (N.D. Cal. 2019). 17 III. … Troiano v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownIbanez v. Electric Hydrogen Co.
District Court, N.D. California · Dec 30, 2024
Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 16 373 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. 2004). … Yuksel v. N. Am. Power Tech., Inc., 805 F. Supp. 310, 313 (E.D. Pa. 13 1992); see also GAF Bldg. Materials Corp. v. Elk Corp. of Dallas, 90 F.3d 479, 482 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGreyhound Corp. v. United States
332 F. Supp. 44 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 5, 1971
Lowry of the firm of MeCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen and defendant was represented by James L. Browning, Jr., Esq. through Martin A. Schainbaum, Esq., Assistant United States Attorney. … On the other hand, the cases of Bulova Watch Company v. United States, 365 U.S. 753 , 81 S.Ct. 864 , 6 L.Ed.2d 72 (1961) and General Motors Corp., Frigidaire Div. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jun 27, 2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BOARD … Each Trust Fund 6 is administered by a Board of Trustees, which has the authority to bring an action in the name of 7 the Trust Funds. (Id.) Collectively, these parties are all referred to as “Plaintiffs.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Oct 13, 2020
West v. … Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 27 U.S. at 691.
Cited 0 timesUnknown65 F. Supp. 2d 1093 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 16, 1999
Miles v. … Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 149 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (iciting Harris v. Walgreen’s Distribution Center, 456 F.2d 588 (6th Cir.1972)).
Cited 10 timesPublishedBonnette v. California Health & Welfare Agency
525 F. Supp. 128 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 24, 1981
See King v. … E. g., Amersbach v. City of Cleveland, supra, at 1036 n.5; Friends of the Earth v. Carey, supra at 37; Usery v. Board of Education, 421 F.Supp. 718 (D.Utah 1976).
Cited 17 timesPublished197 F. 675 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 18, 1911
It is not denied that upon June 15, 1907, the Germanicus was in every respect “ready” for delivery, and upon that day one Welcker, the charterers’ agent, boarding her at Victoria, directed her captain to proceed to Departure … empowered by the contract of hire to name the particular point of delivery, the term of hire did not commence to run until the owner delivered the vessel at the point selected, namely, the coaling wharf; and Anderson et al. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedNational Semiconductor Corp. v. Linear Technology Corp.
703 F. Supp. 845 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 13, 1988
(IEEE Publications Board Policies Pertaining to the Review of Papers). … See Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Monsanto Co., 59 F.R.D. 282 (C.D.Cal.1973); Jack Winter Inc. v. Koratron Co., 327 F.Supp. 206 (N.D.Cal. 1971); Laitram Corp. v. Deepsouth Packing Co., 279 F.Supp. 883 (E.D.La.1968).
Cited 4 timesPublishedDimry v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan
District Court, N.D. California · Jun 1, 2022
Salomaa v. … Co. v. Glenn, 554 U.S. 105 (2008). (Dkt.
Cited 0 timesUnknown79 F. Supp. 975 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 30, 1948
B. v. Fainblatt, 306 U.S. 601 , 307 U.S. 609 , 59 S.Ct. 668 , 83 L. Ed. 1014 ; United States v. Darby, supra; Enterprise Box Company v. Fleming, 5 Cir., 125 F.2d 897 ; Wagner v. American Service Company, supra. … State Board of Equalization, 829 U.S. 69 , at page 84, 67 S.Ct. 156, 164 , 91 L.Ed. 80 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Sep 26, 2023
Brown v. Heckler, 713 F.2d 441, 20 443 (9th Cir. 1983). … Brown. However, Dr.
Cited 0 timesUnknown804 F. Supp. 1235 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 2, 1992
There is an opinion on point from a panel in the Eleventh Circuit: Perkins v. Mobile Housing Board, 847 F.2d 735, 737-38 (11th Cir.1988). … See Webb v. Dyer County Board of Educ., 471 U.S. 234, 241-43 , 105 S.Ct. 1923, 1927-28 , 85 L.Ed.2d 233 (1985).
Cited 23 timesPublished
Ask Donna