Case law

Wuestewald v. Foss Maritime Co.

319 F. Supp. 2d 1002 · District Court, N.D. California · May 11, 2004

[including a] suitable means to board and disembark. The duty thus extends to the gangway by *1009 whomever supplied, owned, or controlled”); Sherfy v. BARGE MARIN HORIZON, 76 F.Supp.2d 1054, 1056 (N.D.Cal.1999). … Smith v.

Hannan v. Boston Scientific Corporation

District Court, N.D. California · May 5, 2020

Id. 24 In Brown v. … Hufft v. Horowitz, 4 Cal. App. 4th 8, 17 (Ct. App. 1992) (citing 12 Brown, 44 Cal. 3d at 1069 n.12).

Eldredge v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Joint Apprenticeship & Training Committee

440 F. Supp. 506 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 3, 1977

Regal Knitwear Co. v. Board, 324 U.S. 9, 13-14 , 65 S.Ct. 478 , 89 L.Ed. 661 (1945); see Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Local Union No. 3, International Union of Operating Engineers, No. … In Kaplan v. Intern.

Smiley James Harris, A.R. v. U. S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE, et al.

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 3, 2025

Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 4 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell v. Dep’t of Social Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 665-683, 694 (1978). 5 V. … See Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 275-276 (1985); McDougal v. County of Imperial, 942 F.2d 668, 674 (9th Cir. 1991). See also Brown vy. Pouncy, 93 F.4th 331 (5th 27 Cir.), cert. denied, 145 S.

Hyundai America, Inc. v. Meissner & Wurst GmbH & Co.

26 F. Supp. 2d 1217 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 6, 1998

Robertson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 749 F.2d 530, 533-34 (9th Cir.1984)(citing 2A J. Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice V 12.08 at 2271 (2d ed.1982)). … Board of Trustees, 489 U.S. 468 , 109 S.Ct. 1248 , 103 L.Ed.2d 488 (1989) is misplaced.

MCSi, Inc. v. Woods

290 F. Supp. 2d 1030 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 25, 2003

Woods posted these statements under a pseudonym in web postings on chat boards operated by Yahoo! Inc. … Global Telemedia Int'l, Inc. v.

Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, Inc.

823 F. Supp. 2d 995 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 24, 2011

In Daubert v. … Farley v.

Hussain

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 2026

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). … Code § 17200 et seq.); id. at 5 (al- leging violations of the Ralph Brown Act, Cal. Gov’t Code § 54950 et seq.; and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 51).

Barraillier v. Muniz

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 10, 2020

Clegg v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); 4 Monell, 436 U.S. at 691.

Soman v. Alameda Health System

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 3, 2021

See Brown v. DG Strategic VIT, LLC, Case No. 3:19-cv-00833, Dkt. 3 No. 70. 4 A good argument can be made that the same outcome should be ordered here. … Even more 5 than in Brown, this cased has lurched erratically for reasons that are not at all clear to the Court. 6 || The Court is concerned that counsel for plaintiffs are not diligently managing their class

Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Mosbacher

488 F. Supp. 2d 889 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 2007

Brown pushes ahead with global warming suit against automakers, San Francisco Chronicle (Feb. 1, 2007). … See Sierra Club v.

United States v. Anderson Cottonwood Irr. Dist.

19 F. Supp. 740 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 26, 1937

Irving Trust Co. v. Frimitt (D.C.) 1 F.Supp. 16 . … Bannon v. Burnes (C.C.) 39 F. 892 ; United States v. Pierce County (D.C.) 193 F. 529 ; Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United States, supra.

CertainTeed Gypsum, Inc. v. Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 16, 2021

V. Canadian Pac. Ry., Ltd., 357 F.3d 1319, 1336 n.19 (Fed. … See Rexnord Corp. v. Laitram Corp., 274 F.3d 1336, 1345 (Fed.

Adams v. General Dynamics Corp.

405 F. Supp. 1020 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 15, 1975

(Pierce v. Riverside Mtg. Securities Co., 25 Cal.App.2d 248 , 77 P.2d 226 ; 15 Fletcher W., Cyclopedia of the Law of Private Corporations, § 7122; Kloberdanz v. … Another case which is typically illustrative of the cases relied on by the third-party plaintiff is Applestein v. United Board and Carton Corp., 60 N.J. Super. 333 , 159 A.2d 146 (1960).

Rush v. Obledo

517 F. Supp. 905 · District Court, N.D. California · May 18, 1981

Marshall v. … Marshall v.

Scramoge Technology Limited v. Apple Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 25, 2023

“A court is under no obligation to delay its own proceedings where parallel litigation is 21 pending before the [Patent Trial and Appeal Board].” Capella Photonics, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., 22 No. … In Verinata Health, the Board had instituted but not yet issued a final 10 decision on one of the plaintiff’s asserted patents. Verinata Health, Inc. v.

Allen v. Nelson

354 F. Supp. 505 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 15, 1973

O’Brien wrote to Chief Deputy Director Stutsman on June 10, 1971, referring petitioner to the Departmental Review Board. … Doran, Secretary, Departmental Review Board, to Chief Deputy Director Stutsman, which essentially repeated the language of Mr.

United States of America v. Wayne

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 15, 2021

Somers v. … See Sanders v. Brown, 504 F.3d 903, 910 (9th Cir. 2007). The court may 25 consider matters that are properly the subject of judicial notice, Knievel v. ESPN, 393 26 F.3d 1068, 1076 (9th Cir. 2005); Lee v.

Abudiab v. City & County

833 F. Supp. 2d 1168 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 20, 2011

For example, in Sims v. … , or has been deemed to have been rejected by the board, in accordance with Chapters 1 and 2 of Part 3 of this division, (emphasis added).

San Francisco Baykeeper v. Sunnyvale

District Court, N.D. California · Jun 6, 2025

Brown v. Celgene Corp., No. 4 10-cv-3165, 2015 WL 12731823, at *2 (C.D. Cal. July 24, 2015) (quoting Russell v. Absolute 5 Collection Servs., Inc., 763 F.3d 385, 396 (4th Cir. 2014)). … Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc., 953 F.3d 567, 574 (9th Cir. 2020). Prejudice is the 21 most important of these factors. Id. 22 A.