Case law

United States v. One 1973 Lincoln Continental

391 F. Supp. 1197 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 28, 1975

In Burke v. … In Burke v.

Colombo

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 18, 2025

In support, 26 Plaintiff cites to the transcript from a Palo Alto Unified School District Board meeting. 27 ECF 205-1, Exh. 40. … (internal citation and quotation 6 omitted); Brown v. Potter, 457 Fed.

Tan v. Grubhub, Inc.

171 F. Supp. 3d 998 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 22, 2016

PAGA provides in relevant part: No action may be brought under this section by an aggrieved employee if the agency or any of its departments, divisions, commissions, boards, agencies, or employees, on the same facts and theories … Nov. 21, 2014) (citing § 2699(h) for the proposition that an aggrieved employee cannot pursue a PAGA claim if the agency or another party is pursuing the same PAGA claims against the same employer); Brown v.

Harris v. Wilson

277 F. Supp. 557 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 5, 1968

In Arketa v. … See, e. g., Spanbauer v. Burke, 374 F.2d 67 (7th Cir. 1966); Cox v. Burke, 361 F.2d 183 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 939 , 87 S.Ct. 304 , 17 L.Ed.2d 218 (1966). But see United States ex rel. Brown v.

D'Antonio

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 8, 2026

Corp. v. … Brodsky v. Apple Inc., 445 F. Supp. 3d 110, 134 (N.D. Cal. 2020); Brown v. Google 3 LLC, 525 F. Supp. 3d 1049, 1069 (N.D. Cal. 2021); CCP §338(d).

Allen v. Nelson

354 F. Supp. 505 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 15, 1973

O’Brien wrote to Chief Deputy Director Stutsman on June 10, 1971, referring petitioner to the Departmental Review Board. … Doran, Secretary, Departmental Review Board, to Chief Deputy Director Stutsman, which essentially repeated the language of Mr.

Simenstad v. United States

325 F. Supp. 1249 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 4, 1971

Davidson v. Commissioner, supra. 7. … Davidson v. Commissioner, supra; Casey v. Commissioner, supra; see also Smith v. Commissioner, 40 B.T.A. 1038 (1939), aff’d. per curiam 113 F.2d 114 (C.A.2d 1940); Kroll v. Commissioner, 49 T.C. 557 (1968). 8.

Rodriguez v. Barrita, Inc.

53 F. Supp. 3d 1268 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 1, 2014

If a district court has discretion to impose an across-the-board ten percent fee “haircut” with little to no explanation, Moreno v. … He relies on Brown v.

Cranford Ins. Co., Inc. v. Allwest Ins. Co.

645 F. Supp. 1440 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 14, 1986

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, — U.S. —, —, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). See also British Airways Board v. … Signal Companies v.

Rodriguez v. Google LLC

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 22, 2022

Notably, however, the amendment 15 in Brown inserted “Google tracking or advertising code” to replace “Google Analytics or Ad 16 Manager” in the previously pled class definition. Brown v. … Plaintiffs’ citation to cases like Risher v. Adecco Inc., 2021 WL 9182421 13 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 17, 2021) and Brown v.

Adams v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 28, 2022

Knievel v. … .”); Page v.

In Re Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

283 B.R. 41 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 30, 2002

As noted by the Court in New York v. … See Muscogee Nation v.

Huynh

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 20, 2026

Corp. v. … Brown v. City of Los Angeles, 521 11 F.3d 1238, 1242 (9th Cir. 2008) (quoting Castellano v. City of New York, 142 F.3d 58, 70 (2d Cir. 12 1998)).

Michel v. Sumo Logic, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 8, 2025

Sayar was Sumo Logic’s Chief Executive Officer and served as a member of Sumo Logic’s 26 Board of Directors (the “Board”) at all relevant times … Dec. 22, 2021)); see Varjabedian, 888 F.3d at 407–08; see also Brown v. Brewer, No. CV06- 22 3731-GHK SHX, 2010 WL 2472182, at *24 (C.D. Cal.

Hogan v. The J. D. Peters

78 F. 368 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 18, 1896

Const. p. 181, citing Rex v. Downes, 3 Term R. 569; Bowen v. Lease, 5 Hill, 221 , 225; U. S. v. Claflin, 97 U. S. 546 ; U. S. v. Gear, 3 How. 120 ; Miller v. Edwards, 8 Colo. 528 , 9 Pac. 632 . … Schell’s Ex’rs v. Fauche, 138 U. S. 562 -572, 11 Sup. Ct. 376. See, also, Railway Co. v. Phelps, 137 U. S. 528 -536, 11 Sup. Ct. 168; Merritt v. Cameron, 137 U. S. 542 -552, 11 Sup.

United States v. $191,910 in U.S. Currency

788 F. Supp. 1090 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 7, 1992

Claimant was preparing to board a flight to Oakland. … The X-ray security personnel reported this to the San Diego Harbor Police and identified Morgan to a San Diego Harbor police officer, who approached Morgan in the boarding area.

Potter Voice Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc.

24 F. Supp. 3d 882 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 6, 2014

Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc. v. United States, 728 F.3d 1348, 1369 (Fed.Cir.2013). See also i4i Ltd. … Consultants, Inc. v.

Dimry v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 15, 2020

,” Booton v. … Saffon v.

In re Letters of Request to Examine Witnesses from the Court of Queen's Bench for Manitoba, Canada

59 F.R.D. 625 · District Court, N.D. California · May 23, 1973

Browning, Jr., United States Attorney for the Northern District of California, appointing C. Rhodes Smith, Q. C.; Leon Mitchell, Q. … Smith, Mitchell, and Donnelly are Commissioners appointed for a Public Inquiry under the authority of Part V of The Manitoba Evidence Act, R.S.M., c.E 150, and Order-in-Council No. 9471.

Weaver v. United California Bank

350 F. Supp. 1373 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 14, 1972

The complaint, which names as defendants UCB, UCB-Basel, Salik, and the directors of both boards, was filed October 5, 1971. … See, also, Schram v. Holmes, 4 F.R.D. 119, 122 (E.D.Mich.1943), relied on by Elizabethtown Trust Co. v. Konschak, 267 F.Supp. 46 (E.D.Pa.1967), cited in the Newhart decision 325 F.Supp. at page 1048 .