Case law

In re Alphabet, Inc., Shareholder Derivative Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 2, 2025

See Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096–99 (9th Cir. 2016). Therefore, Alphabet is ordered to show cause, in writing, by July 7, 2025 why the paragraphs should not be unsealed. … Why would the public disclosure of general descriptions of board briefings and votes, which do not single out individual board members, have a “chilling effect on internal company deliberations”?

Autrey v. Potlatch Corp.

800 F. Supp. 872 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 18, 1992

School Board of the City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696, 715 , 94 S.Ct. 2006, 2018 , 40 L.Ed.2d 476 (1974). … Haley, 786 F.Supp. 1054 (D.D.C.1992); Doe v. Board of County Comm'rs, 783 F.Supp. 1379 (S.D.Fla.1992); Sofferin v. American Airlines, 785 F.Supp. 780 (N.D.Ill.1992). . See, e.g., Goldsmith v.

Sundstrom v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

816 F. Supp. 577 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 8, 1992

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). See also T.W. Elec. Serv. v. Pacific Elec. … Hall v. Hawaii, 791 F.2d 759, 761 (9th Cir.1986).

Chavez

District Court, N.D. California · May 15, 2026

See Concha v. … See Yeseta v.

Dakis on Behalf of Dakis Pension Plan v. Chapman

574 F. Supp. 757 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 14, 1983

Cf., U.S. v. Benny, supra; see, e.g., Moss v. Morgan Stanley, supra, at 1359; Kimmel v. Peterson, 565 F.Supp. 476 , CCH Fed.Sec.Rep. ¶ 99,225 (E.D.Pa.1983); Schacht v. … Brown, 711 F.2d 1343 , CCH Fed.Sec.Rep. 11 99,160 (7th Cir.1983).

Detoy v. City & County of San Francisco

196 F.R.D. 362 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 19, 2000

Overseas Private Investment Corp. v. … Kyle Engineering Co. v. Kleppe, 600 F.2d 226, 231 (9th Cir. 1979). . Deukmejian v. Superior Court, 143 Cal.App.3d 632 , 191 Cal.Rptr. 905 (1983). . State Board of Pharmacy v.

Alaniz v. California Processors, Inc.

73 F.R.D. 269 · District Court, N.D. California · May 5, 1976

An action such as this, where the plaintiffs bring an across-the-board attack on the allegedly unequal employment practices of the defendants, necessarily raises common questions of law and fact. Johnson v. … Each decision of the Board of Trustees concerning disbursements from the Fund is subject to Conformance Committee approval.

Hill v. Workday, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 28, 2025

Brown believed 1 Brown might be interviewed for the open role. Id. at ¶ 68–69. Subsequently, Ms. Hauck informed 2 Plaintiff Hill that she had spoken to Ms. Allen about Ms. Brown, and Ms. … Horsford v. Board of Trustees of Cal. State Univ., 132 19 Cal. App. 4th 359, 373 (Cal. App. 5th Dist. Aug. 31, 2005).

Grossman v. Commissioner

687 F. Supp. 1401 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 22, 1987

Administrative level review is available before the Merit Systems Protection Board. … Caddington v. United States, 178 F.Supp. 604, 606 (Ct.Cl.1959).

Fine v. Rubin

623 F. Supp. 171 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 20, 1985

See Goldman v. Belden, 754 F.2d 1059, 1070 (2d Cir.1985). III. … Admiralty Fund v. Jones, 677 F.2d 1289, 1294 (9th Cir.1982).

Nasser v. United States

257 F. Supp. 443 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 26, 1966

Adams v. Glenn, (W.D.Ky 1950) 42 AFTR 1356; Gurtman v. United States, 237 F.Supp. 533, 535 (N.J. 1965); Welch v. Helvering, 1933, 290 U.S. 111, 115 , 54 S.Ct. 8 , 78 L.Ed. 212 . … It is settled that a corporate distribution to a shareholder in order to constitute a dividend, need not be formally declared a dividend by the Board of Directors. Chism’s Estate v.

Environmental Protection Information Center v. Pacific Lumber Co.

266 F. Supp. 2d 1101 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 6, 2003

Water Code § 13000 et seq., which created Regional Water Quality Control Boards responsible for issuing Waste Discharge Requirements ("WDRs”). … Inst. v. Board of Governors of the Fed. Reserve Sys., 551 F.2d 1270, 1278 (D.C.Cir.1977)).

Behne v. Microtouch Systems, Inc.

58 F. Supp. 2d 1096 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 15, 1999

McNutt v. Board of Trustees, 141 F.3d 706, 709 (7th Cir.1998); Tanca v. Nordberg, 98 F.3d 680, 684 (1st Cir.1996) cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 1253 , 137 L.Ed.2d 333 (1997); Woodson v. … In Riess v.

Rodgers v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

655 F. Supp. 2d 1081 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 8, 2009

Ahmed Robbie, a physician board-certified in neurology, also examined Rodgers’ file and spoke to Dr. Lothia. … In Abatie v.

Tremblay v. OpenAI, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · May 7, 2024

Defendants add that neither is this 1 demand its employees and Board members turn over [username] information about their personal 2 [social media] accounts.” Id. … Defendants then state that “Plaintiffs’ cited cases are of no help 3 [because] [i]n Roblox Corp. v. WowWowee Grp. Ltd., [2023 WL 8374741, at *2 (N.D. Cal.

Schmid v. Maxwell

228 F. Supp. 105 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 19, 1964

State Board of Equalization, 1963, [218 A.C.A. 604], . 32 Cal.Rptr. 588 . … Branch v.

Cammas

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 23, 2026

Scholar v. Pac. Bell, 963 F.2d 264, 268 (9th Cir. 20 1992) (citing Irwin v. Dep’t of Veteran Affs., 498 U.S. 89, 111 (1990) and Baldwin Cnty. Welcome 21 Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 (1984) (per curiam)). … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 19 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v.

Firsov

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 8, 2026

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). … See Ramirez v.

The Regents of the University of Michigan v. Leica Microsystems Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 10, 2020

Steel Corp. v. United States, 730 F.2d 1465 (Fed. Cir. 1984) and Brown Bag Software 26 v. … Steel, 3 730 F.2d at 1468; Brown Bag Software, 960 F.2d at 1470-71.

Adams v. Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.

242 F.R.D. 530 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 11, 2007

However, in Belcher v. … Irwin v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. 89, *543 96 , 111 S.Ct. 453 , 112 L.Ed.2d 435 (1990) (citing Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984)).