Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

1.99s

  • Tremblay v. OpenAI, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · May 7, 2024

    Defendants add that neither is this 1 demand its employees and Board members turn over [username] information about their personal 2 [social media] accounts.” Id. … Defendants then state that “Plaintiffs’ cited cases are of no help 3 [because] [i]n Roblox Corp. v. WowWowee Grp. Ltd., [2023 WL 8374741, at *2 (N.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cordova v. Lake County

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 8, 2024

    Comm’rs of 10 Bryan Ct., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997) (“Brown”); Monell v. N.Y. City Dep’t of Soc. 11 Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 694-95 (1978). … Brown, 520 U.S. at 412.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kendall v. Liquid Sugars, Inc.

    227 B.R. 530 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 17, 1998

    Saundra Brown Armstrong; 7/2/96.) … See Hall-Mark Electronics Corp. v. Sims, 179 B.R. 149, 155 (9th Cir. BAP 1995). 1.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

    288 F. Supp. 343 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 24, 1968

    Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938). See e. g., United States v. Bank of America, 47 F.Supp. 279 (N.D. Cal.1942). … Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. at 366-367 , 63 S.Ct. at 575 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sea Ranch Ass'n v. California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission

    396 F. Supp. 533 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 13, 1975

    It is true that McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963), and the strong dissent in Harrison v. … This procedure was suggested in England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411, 421 , 84 S.Ct. 461 , 11 L.Ed.2d 440 (1964).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Austin v. Georgetown University

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 16, 2024

    De Long v. Hennessy, 912 F.2d 15 1144, 1147 (9th Cir. 1990); Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp., 500 F.3d 1047, 1057 (9th 16 Cir. 2007). … See, e.g., Austin v. Kemper Corp. (Ins.), No. 21- 7 cv-3208-SI (N.D. Cal. filed Apr. 29, 2021); Austin v. Kemper Indep. Ins. Co. (2167877), 8 No. 24-cv-1120-EMC (N.D. Cal. filed Feb. 23, 2024); Austin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hill v. Workday, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 28, 2025

    Brown believed 1 Brown might be interviewed for the open role. Id. at ¶ 68–69. Subsequently, Ms. Hauck informed 2 Plaintiff Hill that she had spoken to Ms. Allen about Ms. Brown, and Ms. … Horsford v. Board of Trustees of Cal. State Univ., 132 19 Cal. App. 4th 359, 373 (Cal. App. 5th Dist. Aug. 31, 2005).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Promise Public Schools, Inc. v. San Jose Unified School District

    District Court, N.D. California · Mar 10, 2021

    Promise appealed SJUSD’s decision to the County 19 Board of Education, and then the State Board of Education. Id. ¶ 21. … But because “the Fourteenth Amendment was not intended to shift the whole 8 of the public law of the states into the federal courts,” id. at 1408 (quoting Brown v. 9 Brienen, 722 F.2d 360, 364 (7th Cir.1983)), the Ninth

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Old Colony Insurance v. Jeffery's Mill & Warehouse, Inc.

    146 F. Supp. 277 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 28, 1956

    Votaw v. Farmers Automobile Inter-Ins. Exch., 15 Cal.2d 24, 29 , 97 P.2d 958 , 126 A.L.R. 538 , and Miller v. … Two members of Taylor-Waleott were placed on the board of five directors of defendant. 15.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • In re Kalobios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Securities Litigation

    258 F. Supp. 3d 999 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 23, 2017

    Nevertheless, by November 19,2105, KaloBios’ Board had accepted Shkreli’s financing proposal and appointed him as CEO. FAC ¶¶ 50-54. The existing Board then resigned. See id. ¶ 62(b). … Plaintiffs cite Berry v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Barge v. United States

    72 F. Supp. 328 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 7, 1947

    That said Barge was thirty-three years of age, in good health, and was earning, or capable of earning, $400 per month, together with board and lodging of the reasonable value of $75 per month. … Socony-Vacuum Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fernandez v. O'Malley

    District Court, N.D. California · May 6, 2025

    Brown-Hunter v. 4 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Return on Intelligence, Ltd. v. Shenkman

    District Court, N.D. California · Dec 6, 2024

    He presented that 1 Entities’ Boards. … Shenkman owed the ROI Entities and their shareholders a fiduciary duty while 19 he was on their Boards.11 See, e.g., Jones v. H.F. Ahmanson & Co., 1 Cal. 3d 93, 110 (1969); Cal. 20 Corp. Code § 309(a). Mr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Telemac Corp. v. Teledigital, Inc.

    450 F. Supp. 2d 1107 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 13, 2006

    KLA-Tencor Corp. v. Nanometrics, Inc., 2006 WL 708661 , *4 (N.D.Cal. Mar.16, 2006) (citing Rohm and Haas Co. v. Brotech Corp., 24 U.S.P.Q 2d 1369, 1372, 1992 WL 313099 (D.Del.1992)). … ASCII Corp. v. STD Entm’t USA, Inc., 844 F.Supp. 1378, 1381 (N.D.Cal.1994).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • City of Antioch v. Candidates' Outdoor Graphic Service

    557 F. Supp. 52 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 15, 1982

    See, e.g., Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131 , 86 S.Ct. 719 , 15 L.Ed.2d 637 (1966) (silent vigil would not interfere with tranquility of *56 public library, but noisy protest could be banned); Adderly v. … Brown, 447 U.S. 455 , 100 S.Ct. 2286 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980) (differential treatment of labor and nonlabor picketing impermissibly accords preferential treatment to views on one subject); Erznoznik v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Deena L. Dias v. Nancy A. Berryhill

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 25, 2019

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492-93 (9th Cir. 2015) 22 (quoting Lingenfelter v. Astrue, 504 F.3d 1028, 1036 (9th Cir. 2007)). … See Tidwell v. Apfel, 161 F.3d 599, 602 3 (9th Cir. 1999); and, Cox v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pacific Coast Steamship Co. v. Moore

    70 F. 870 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 11, 1896

    As a matter of law. the Pacific Coast Steamship Company only became responsible as a carrier when the sacks of barley were delivered to it for shipment on board its steamer. … Co. v. United States Rolling-Stock Co. (111. Sup.) 27 N. E. 59 . This rule applies to carriage by water. Carv. Carr, by Sea, § 172. As defined in Kohn v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Walker v. University Books, Inc.

    382 F. Supp. 126 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 15, 1974

    McGee v. … In a more recent decision, Dawkins v. White Products Corp. of Middleville, Michigan, 443 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1971), Judges Tuttle, Brown, and Clark reached a similar result.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Shields v. Federation Internationale De Natation

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 11, 2022

    Brown v. Ticor Title Ins., 982 F.2d 386, 390 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation 7 omitted). … See 27 Brown v. Brown, NO. CV 13-03318 SI, 2013 WL 12400041, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2013); 1 2017).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hannon v. Chater

    900 F. Supp. 1276 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 12, 1995

    Hensley v. … Probe v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.