Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscand

7,967 results

0.49s

  • United States v. Zagari

    419 F. Supp. 494 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 11, 1976

    Falcone, 3 Cir., 505 F.2d 478 (1974); Davis v. Board of Com’rs. of Mobile County, supra. … See Judge Gee’s concurring opinion in Parrish v. Board of Com’rs of Alabama State Bar, supra, 524 F.2d at 105 .

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Fass v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

    9 F.2d 1004 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 31, 1924

    In American Trading Co. v. Fairhaven Co., 10 F.(2d) 981 , I have heretofore considered the question as to the effect of section 3 of the Harter Act (Comp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Phillips v. Franchise Tax Board

    District Court, N.D. California · Sep 30, 2025

    11 || California Franchise Tax Board from garnishing his wages to collect unpaid taxes on the theory 12 || that the Tax Board lacks legal authority over him. … Hyatt 3 17 || v. Yee, 871 F.3d 1067, 1074 (9th Cir. 2017) (quoting Franchise Tax Bd. of California v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Wilson

    133 F. Supp. 882 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 3, 1955

    Defendant’s argument that an action under 40 U.S.C.A. § 489 is penal in nature receives support from United States v. Witherspoon, 6 Cir., 1954, 211 F.2d 858 , but is rejected in United States v. … Weaver, 5 Cir., 1953, 207 F.2d 796 and in United States v. Rex Trailer Co., 7 Cir., 1955, 218 F.2d 880 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

    856 F. Supp. 2d 1103 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 18, 2012

    Brown (“Brown Deck”), ECF No. 79-1, and the Declaration of Dean M. Harvey (“Harvey Deck”), ECF No. 93. … Jobs, Apple and Google board member Mr. Levinson, and Google CEO and Apple board member Mr. Schmidt. Id. ¶¶ 55, 57, 58, 72, 79, 87, 97, 103, 108. Defendants cite Jicarilla Apache Tribe v.

    Cited 60 timesPublished
  • United States v. Bonanno

    452 F. Supp. 743 · District Court, N.D. California · May 17, 1978

    Tippitt v. United States Board of Parole, 446 F.2d 26, 27 (6th Cir. 1971); Humphrey v. United States Board of Parole, 438 F.2d 1214, 1215 (3rd Cir. 1971); Sargis v. … United States Board of Parole, 391 F.Supp. 362, 365-66 (E.D.Missouri 1975); Godoy v. United States Board of Parole, 345 F.Supp. 1292, 1294 (C.D.Cal.1972).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Little v. United States

    15 F. Cas. 614 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 15, 1857

    He arrived in the middle of the night, and slept on board the steamboat, and he came back by the return boat at two p. m. of the day on which he arrived. … The document in question is produced for the first time by Brown, a witness examined in this court April 3d, 1857, more than four years after the claim was presented to the board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wine v. Merit Systems Protection Board

    District Court, N.D. California · Oct 8, 2025

    Case No. 25-cv-03336-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. … ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 9 RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION 10 BOARD, et al.,

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. City of Monterey

    6 F.2d 893 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 9, 1925

    Rex v. Coombes, 1 Leach, 388. In United States v. Davis, Fed. Cas. … No. 14932, 2 Sumn. 482 , Judge Story ruled that where the killer stood on board an American ship and the person killed on-board a foreign vessel, an American court was without jurisdiction. In The Epsilon, Fed. Cas.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United States v. Mitchell

    600 F. Supp. 164 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 4, 1985

    Greene v. United States, 376 U.S. 149 , 84 S.Ct. 615 , 11 L.Ed.2d 576 (1964). … The Government argued at oral argument that in placing reliance on Edwards Congress implicitly relied De Veau v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • California Parents for the Equalization of Educational Materials v. Torlakson

    267 F. Supp. 3d 1218 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 13, 2017

    Walz v. Tax Com. of N.Y., 397 U.S. 664, 675 , 90 S.Ct. 1409 , 25 L.Ed.24 697 (1970). The Ninth Circuit held in Brown v. … See Brown, 27 F.3d at 1379 . .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Camping Unlimited For The Developmentally Disabled v. Brown & Brown of Garden City, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. California · Feb 9, 2022

    Co. v. Pearson, 169 Cal. … Reddy v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Scott Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Pacific Custom Materials, Inc.

    939 F. Supp. 1443 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 18, 1996

    The Ninth Circuit also has noted that “[njormally there is a significant delay before the Board issues its ruling in an unfair labor practice proceeding.” Aguayo for NLRB v. … Kallmann v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Johnstech Int'l Corp. v. JF Microtechnology SDN BHD

    315 F. Supp. 3d 1130 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 8, 2018

    Brown measured the prior art to slide 191 microns, ROL 200 to slide 1 micron, and Zigma to slide 24 microns. Tr. at 441. … Brown had parameterized his FEA measurements and offered competing results, the jury was not required to credit JFM's figures over Johnstech's.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nietes v. American President Lines, Ltd.

    188 F. Supp. 219 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 23, 1959

    Collins v. Hertfordshire C.C., (1947) 1 All E.R. 633; Gold v. Essex C.C., (1942) 2 All E.R. 237; Hansch v. Hackett, 190 Wash. 97 , 66 P.2d 1129 ; Giusti v. C. H.. Weston Co., 165 Or. 525 , 108 P.2d 1010 ; Brown v. … This duty extends to both passengers and seamen whose lives may be threatened by illness on board ship. 13 C.J.S. Section 694(b), 1293-4.

    Disagreed with by Carlisle v. Carnival Corp., 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 895 (2004)Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Pickell v. Reed

    326 F. Supp. 1086 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 7, 1971

    On that date, Naval Security Officers Shamblin and Brown were notified that a woman was living in a van parked behind one of the barracks at Moffet Field. … In Schwartz v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hoffman v. Retail Store Employees' Union Local No. 428

    206 F. Supp. 271 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 27, 1962

    Kennedy etc., v. Retail Clerks Union Local 324, D.C., 194 F.Supp. 131 ; Brown, etc., v. Department & Specialty Store Employees Union, D.C., 187 F.Supp. 619 ; see also, Cosentino, etc. v. Carpenters Dist. … See, Brown, etc. v. Department & Specialty Store Employees Union, D.C., 1960, 187 F.Supp. 619, 624-625 ; Department and Specialty Store Employees’ Union, etc. v. Brown, 9 Cir., 1960, 284 F.2d 619 , 626.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mori v. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Ship Builders, Blacksmiths, Forgers & Helpers, Local Lodge No. 6

    482 F. Supp. 838 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 5, 1979

    See also United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners v. Brown, 343 F.2d 872 , 886 (10th Cir. 1965); White v. King, 319 F.Supp. 122, 125 (E.D.La.1970). Defendants also rely on Ranes v. … See King v. Randazzo, supra; United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners v. Brown, supra.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Sonoma County Land Company

    District Court, N.D. California · Apr 14, 2023

    See, e.g., Brown v. Printing Plus, et al., 16-cv-07250; Brown v. Ukiah Ford Inc., 21 et al., 17-cv-00829; Brown v. Willits Wine & Spirits, et al., 17-cv-01035; Brown v. Aguilar, et al., 22 17-cv-01781. … with Brown.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In re Coryell

    307 F. Supp. 209 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 5, 1969

    Petitioner states that he made an application to the Army Board for Corrections of Military Records and at oral argument claimed that he received an unfavorable reply from the Board. … See Witmer v. United States, supra, at 381, 66 S.Ct. 423 ; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United States, 201 F.2d 819, 822 (6th Cir. 1953); Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. John R.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.