Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,050 results
1.56s
222 F.R.D. 189 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 21, 2004
Bendick’s benchmarking analysis is of the type that clearly goes to the weight, rather than the admissibility, of the evidence. Third, Defendant contends that Dr. … While Defendant’s justifications for these changes vary, the Court need not address them in detail because Plaintiffs fail to establish sufficient prejudice.
Cited 25 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Aug 6, 2021
This “self-inflicted injur[y]” cannot establish Article III standing. 20 Clapper v. Amnesty Int'l USA, 568 U.S. 398, 418 (2013). … Indeed, several courts 22 have held that “a write-in candidate[] cannot establish that he will be irreparably injured by failing 23 to appear as an affirmative candidate on the ballot.” Cronin v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGen Digital, Inc. v. Sycomp, a Technology Company, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California · Mar 24, 2025
LEGAL STANDARD 18 A motion for judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 12(c) will be granted “when the moving party clearly establishes … Quite the 6 contrary, it suggests that there remains a material issue of fact—whether the purchase 7 orders (which certainly seem to qualify as Order Instruments) were mutually executed. 8 Though Plaintiff does
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Oct 20, 2021
Artz discussed treatment options with Plaintiff, 6 but does not establish that he advised any particular treatments or medications. Cf. … They will, at best, keep you as you are.” 26 (AR 64, 65-66.) 27 In sum, while Plaintiff clearly had concerns about possible treatments, the record does not
Cited 0 timesUnknownPublic.resource.org v. United States Internal Revenue Service
50 F. Supp. 3d 1212 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 20, 2014
In its motion, the IRS does not dispute that it is an agency subject to FOIA, that the data in question qualify as “records” under the definition of the statute, or that the records were withheld. … No. 89-813 at 38 (“It is the purpose of the present bill to eliminate [portions of section 3 of the APA], to establish a general philosophy of full agency disclosure unless information is exempted under clearly delineated
Cited 0 timesPublishedde Tagle v. Santa Clara County Sheriff
District Court, N.D. California · Jul 23, 2024
Before granting such an 18 authorization, the court must ensure the action is not frivolous or malicious, states a claim upon 19 which relief may be granted, and does not seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 396–97 (1989). 4 “It is well-established that overly tight handcuffing can constitute excessive force.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownChinonye Ugorji v. County of Lake
District Court, N.D. California · Jul 6, 2020
Dist., 39 Cal. 4th 192, 1999 (2006) 10 (finding hospital’s peer review procedure qualifies as “official proceeding”). … Prosecutorial Immunity 17 Defendants last assert prosecutorial immunity under California Government Code § 821.6. 18 Prosecutorial immunity applies to public employees for injuries
Cited 0 timesUnknownde Tagle v. Santa Clara County Sheriff Department
District Court, N.D. California · Jul 23, 2024
Before granting such an 18 authorization, the court must ensure the action is not frivolous or malicious, states a claim upon 19 which relief may be granted, and does not seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 396–97 (1989). 4 “It is well-established that overly tight handcuffing can constitute excessive force.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Dec 8, 2025
However, 1 of facts that would establish the timeliness of the claim.” Supermail Cargo, Inc. v. United States, 2 68 F.3d 1204, 1207 (9th Cir. 1995). … Among 7 other elements, Washeleski must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits.
Cited 0 timesUnknown734 F. Supp. 2d 956 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 17, 2010
The parties dispute whether OIC qualifies as the owner of the three HRMS copyrights at issue during the pre-March 1, 2005 period. … The evidence presented does not clearly establish that SAP TN’s copying of plaintiffs’ files caused any slowdowns, disruptions in service, crashes, or other impairments to the availability or accessibility of the systems
Cited 8 timesPublished17 F. Supp. 3d 932 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 5, 2014
To establish a prima facie case of discrimination based on race, plaintiff must show that he is a member of a protected class; that he was qualified for his position or was performing satisfactorily; that he experienced an … The only clearly race-based comment was the one incident when Somoon whispered “nigger” in plaintiffs ear.
Cited 4 timesPublishedSun Microsystems, Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc.
534 F. Supp. 2d 1101 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 15, 2007
Thus, the court finds that plaintiffs must also establish antitrust standing. … Turning to these documents, SGI’s reorganization plan clearly defines liquidating trust assets as claims “arising out of the purchase of DRAM between April 1999 and June 2002 [plus $250,000 to litigate the claims].”
Cited 6 timesPublishedBailey v. Contra Costa County Jail Medical
District Court, N.D. California · Oct 6, 2025
The court must 6 identify cognizable claims and dismiss claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim 7 upon which relief may be granted, or seek monetary relief from a defendant immune from such 8 … The fact that a pro se litigant would be better served with the assistance of 2 counsel does not necessarily qualify plaintiff to be appointed pro bono counsel.
Cited 0 timesUnknownde Tagle v. Santa Clara County
District Court, N.D. California · Jul 23, 2024
Before granting such an 18 authorization, the court must ensure the action is not frivolous or malicious, states a claim upon 19 which relief may be granted, and does not seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 396–97 (1989). 4 “It is well-established that overly tight handcuffing can constitute excessive force.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Dec 17, 2021
what job functions are essential as much of the information which determines those essential functions lies uniquely with the employer. 23 To meet its burden of production, [the employer] must clearly … [Plaintiff] clearly understands that his failure to be regular in attendance and/or being AWOL is a violation of the above 11 terms and will establish just cause for his immediate removal[.] 12
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Jan 5, 2023
There are no allegations establishing their 11 involvement in his continued retention in the ad-seg. … Defendants are advised that summary judgment cannot be granted, nor 14 qualified immunity found, if material facts are in dispute.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. California · Mar 1, 2020
(Docket No. 2 at 2.) 1 immunity. Dkt. No. 15, (hereinafter “Mot.”2). Plaintiff filed a “declaration in opposition,” 2 Dkt. No. 32, along with exhibits in support thereof, Dkt. … immunity argument.
Cited 0 timesUnknown321 F. Supp. 3d 1083 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 6, 2018
While one method alleging a viable claim of discrimination is for the plaintiff to allege that the defendants (i) withheld a benefit from the plaintiff (ii) for which he or she was qualified (iii) which was extended to other … City of Newport Beach , 730 F.3d 1142 , 1158-59 (9th Cir. 2013), "[o]ur cases clearly establish that plaintiffs who allege disparate treatment under statutory anti-discrimination laws need not demonstrate the existence of
Cited 14 timesPublished977 F. Supp. 996 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 5, 1997
The plaintiff bears the initial burden of establishing a prima facie ease of discrimination. … Rather, it clearly concerns a personnel dispute and private grievance between Plaintiff and Defendants.
Cited 3 timesPublishedPrado v. Allied Domecq Spirits & Wine Group Disability Income Policy
800 F. Supp. 2d 1077 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 22, 2011
The SPD is clearly identified as the summary plan description of “Hiram Walker & Sons Inc. Long Term Disability Plan Number 507.” … Another factor is Liberty’s failure to provide Plaintiff with guidance as to what sort of evidence Liberty would find acceptable to establish a disability based on Plaintiffs pain.
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna