Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
2.18s
District Court, N.D. California · Dec 16, 2024
Brown-Hunter v. 20 Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2015); see also 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 492.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMcClean v. Solano/Napa Counties Electrical Workers Profit Sharing Plan
District Court, N.D. California · Aug 7, 2024
.”); Amato v. … See Lee v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown21 F.2d 79 · District Court, N.D. California · May 12, 1927
S. v. M. Levy’s Sons (C. C. … Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. (D. C.) 7 F.(2d) 895 ; (C. C. A.) 12 F.(2d) 721 , establishing a deviation.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Sep 14, 2020
Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLC, 487 F.3d 531, 534 (7th Cir. 2007). … AE is a Virginia limited liability company with its principal place of business in Richmond, Virginia," and "Defendant EBY-BROWN COMPANY, LLC ('EBY-BROWN') is a Delaware limited liability company with a principal place
Cited 0 timesUnknown690 F. Supp. 2d 982 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 21, 2010
Butler v. … V.
Cited 1 timesPublishedAccess Optical Networks, Inc. v. Seagate Technology LLC
District Court, N.D. California · Nov 21, 2025
Block v. … Grimmett v. Brown, 75 F.3d 506, 514 (9th Cir. 1996); Weatherly v. 12 Universal Music Publ’g Grp., 125 Cal.
Cited 0 timesUnknown52 F. Supp. 850 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 17, 1943
Brown v. United States, 8 Cranch 110 , 3 L.Ed. 504 ; Miller v. United States, 11 Wall. 268 , 20 L.Ed. 135 . … Bank v. Bancroft, 10 Cir., 121 F.2d 921 ; Payne v.
Cited 4 timesPublished268 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 6, 1967
Co. v. … First, it is uncontroverted that the longshoreman was allowed to board the vessel in a state of severe intoxication.
Cited 3 timesPublishedUnited States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Henke
275 F. Supp. 2d 1075 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 31, 2003
SEC v. … (quoting SEC v.
Cited 8 timesPublished576 F. Supp. 218 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 31, 1983
Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 507 F.2d 1107, 1113 (D.C.Cir.1973). They clarify and explain existing law or regulations, Gos-man v. … Gibson Wine Co. v. Snyder, 194 F.2d 329, 331-32 (D.C.Cir.1952); see also National Association of Insurance Agents, Inc. v. Board of Governors, 489 F.2d 1268, 1270 (D.C.Cir.1974).
Cited 17 timesPublishedHaagen-Dazs Co. v. Double Rainbow Gourmet Ice Creams, Inc.
691 F. Supp. 1262 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 23, 1988
United States v. DuPont & Co., 351 U.S. 377, 394-95, 404 , 76 S.Ct. 994, 1012 , 100 L.Ed. 1264 (1956); Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1523-24 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … See, e.g., Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 326 , 82 S.Ct. at 1524 ; United States v. Jos.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGibbons v. Interbank Funding Group
208 F.R.D. 278 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 23, 2002
Jackson v. Grant, 890 F.2d 118, 120 (9th Cir. 1989). … The Fifth Circuit noted in James v. Home Const.
Cited 11 timesPublishedCalifornia League of Independent Insurance Producers v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
175 F. Supp. 857 · District Court, N.D. California · May 20, 1959
In F.T.C. v. National Cas. … Board of Fire Underwriters of the Pacific, 1946, 29 Cal.2d 34 , 172 P.2d 867 ), § 1012(b) of the McCarran Act precludes a Sherman Act suit if the charges alleged in the complaint are covered by said State act.
Cited 43 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Sep 28, 2023
She recounts two particular board meetings and one “business review” 20 meeting (a board meeting to assess business performance outside of the quarterly board meetings), 21 that were held at hotels in San Francisco.18 … Board meetings were held in California, five board members 17 lived in California, and there are no longer any board members near Boston.22 18 The plaintiff also submitted twenty-six LinkedIn profiles of “executives
Cited 0 timesUnknown941 F. Supp. 930 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 20, 1996
Rather, they are created and their dimensions are defined by existing rules or understandings that stem from an independent source such as state law____” Board of Regents v. … This claim finds no support in National Labor Relations Board v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251 , 95 S.Ct. 959 , 43 L.Ed.2d 171 (1975), cited by plaintiff. The J.
Cited 5 timesPublishedIn Re Syntex Corp. Securities Litigation
855 F. Supp. 1086 · District Court, N.D. California · May 27, 1994
Freiman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, represented that “ ‘[w]e’re doing well and I think we have a great future,’ ” “ ‘[bjusiness will be good this year ... … . -, 114 S.Ct. 1837 , 128 L.Ed.2d 465 (May 16, 1994); Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36, 41 (2d Cir.1993).
Cited 60 timesPublished164 F. Supp. 587 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 1, 1958
Berry v. … Whether the board or the Secretary might invest him with such power is another matter; until they do, he is functus officio once he has delivered the alien.” 291 F. at page 666 .
Cited 18 timesPublishedTeresa P. v. Berkeley Unified School Dist.
724 F. Supp. 698 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 8, 1989
The Court in Lau v. … NOTES [1] See e.g., Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education, 811 F.2d 1030, 1041 (7th Cir.1987); Keyes v.
Cited 3 timesPublished84 F. 324 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 13, 1897
People v. Gilmore, 4 Cal. 376 ; People v. Gordon, 99 Cal. 227 , 33 Pac. 901 ; Com. v. Herty, 109 Mass. 348 ; State v. Belden, 33 Wis. 121 ; State v. Martin, 30 Wis. 216 ; State v. Hill, Id. 416; State v. … In speaking of what is meant by the phrase “due process of law,” the supreme court of Mississippi, in Brown v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedMeirer v. Scandinavian Airlines System
District Court, N.D. California · Jan 15, 2021
Schwarzenegger v. … In Jensen v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna