Case law

Equitable Trust Co. v. Western Pac. Ry. Co.

299 F. 304 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 21, 1923

In the second case cited, Brown v. Pennsylvania Canal Co. (D. C.) 274 Fed. 467 , there was a suit to foreclose a mortgage brought by one bondholder in which others were' permitted to intervene. … And again, in the case of Brown v.

Hicks v. PGA Tour, Inc.

165 F. Supp. 3d 898 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 9, 2016

(quoting Brown Shoe v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962)). … See Scognamillo v. Credit Suisse First Bos. LLC, No. C03-2061 TEH, 2005 WL 2045807 , at *9 (N.D.Cal. Aug. 25, 2005); see also Brown v. Philip Morris Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 795, 797 (3d Cir.2001); cf. Soto-Negron v.

United States v. Stewart

29 F. Supp. 59 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 24, 1939

The quoted language is from United States v. … United States v. O’ Donnell, supra.

In Re Super Prem. Ice Cream Distrib. Antitrust Lit.

691 F. Supp. 1262 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 23, 1988

United States v. DuPont & Co., 351 U.S. 377, 394-95, 404 , 76 S.Ct. 994, 1012 , 100 L.Ed. 1264 (1956); Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1523-24 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … See, e.g., Brown Shoe, 370 U.S. at 326 , 82 S.Ct. at 1524 ; United States v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co., 253 F.Supp. 129, 145-6 (N.D.

Gallagher v. City and County of San Francisco

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 30, 2023

Id. ¶ 42. 15 Gallagher contacted the San Francisco Board of Supervisors for help, and the Board 16 facilitated a meeting between Gallagher and SFDBI. Id. ¶ 43. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v. City of Oakland, 47 F.3d 2 1522, 1534 (9th Cir. 1995).

Hanover Insurance v. Fremont Bank

68 F. Supp. 3d 1085 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 22, 2014

The Bank argues that Brown v. Kennard, 94 Cal.App.4th 40, 45 , 113 Cal.Rptr.2d 891 (2001) and Rusheen v. … The claims in Brown and Rusheen thus directly "arose from” the collection activities.

Crocker First National Bank v. United States

137 F. Supp. 573 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 28, 1955

. § 3746 ; United States v. Steel Furniture Co., 6 Cir., 1935, 74 F.2d 744 . … of Tax Appeals for redetermination of a deficiency, or for review of a decision rendered by the Board.

West Pub. Co. v. McColgan

46 F. Supp. 163 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 24, 1942

Interborough Rapid Transit Co., D.C., 10 F.Supp. 512 , affirmed, 2 Cir., 76 F.2d 1002 , certiorari denied City *165 of New York v. … Nevin v. Martin, D.C., 22 F.Supp. 836 , affirmed 307 U.S. 615 , 59 S.Ct. 1046 , 83 L.Ed. 1497 .

Swords to Plowshares v. Kemp

423 F. Supp. 2d 1031 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 16, 2005

City of Chi. v. Int’l College of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 164 , 118 S.Ct. 523 , 139 L.Ed.2d 525 (1997) (citing Franchise Tax Board v. Constr. … Franchise Tax Board, 463 U.S. at 9 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 .

Thanh Long Le v. Waters

863 F. Supp. 1104 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 18, 1994

Id.; see also Palmer v. … See Jordan v. De George, 341 U.S. 223 , 71 S.Ct. 703 , 95 L.Ed. 886 , reh’g denied, 341 U.S. 956 , 71 S.Ct. 1011 , 95 L.Ed. 1377 (1951); Fleuti v.

EcoHub, LLC v. Recology Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 23, 2025

See Villiarimo v. … Romano v.

Edwards v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

848 F. Supp. 1460 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 26, 1994

Adams v. Catalyst Research, Division of Mine Safety Appliances Co., 659 F.Supp. 163, 164 (D.Md.1987); Suburban Hospital, Inc. v. Dwiggins, 324 Md. 294, 303 , 596 A.2d 1069, 1073 (1991). … Comeaux v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 916 F.2d 1264, 1271 (9th Cir.1990).

EUREKA FEDERAL SAV., ETC. v. Flynn

534 F. Supp. 479 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 9, 1982

1) *481 that the validity of due-on-sale clauses is governed by federal law, (2) that Eureka's exercise of that option was proper, and (3) that Eureka is subject to the regulatory authority of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board … Nalore v. San Diego Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 663 F.2d 841, 842 (9th Cir. 1981). It cannot establish federal subject matter jurisdiction. Phillips Petroleum Co. v.

Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 15, 2022

See, e.g., 19 Brown v. USA Taekwondo, 11 Cal. 5th 204, 209 (2021), reh’g denied (May 12, 2021); Jane Doe No. 20 1 v. Uber Techs., Inc., 79 Cal. App. 5th 410 (2022), reh’g denied (Aug. 24, 2022). … Brown, 11 11 Cal.5th at 212-13. 12 Lugtu v. California Highway Patrol, 26 Cal. 4th 703, 717 (2001), best supports Plaintiff’s 13 argument.

Childs v. Gasca

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 7, 2022

Balistreri v. … Whitley v.

Minor v. Fedex Office & Print Services, Inc.

182 F. Supp. 3d 966 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 25, 2016

(citing Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 316 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979)). Here, a review of California Insurance Code § 1871.4 does not reveal an express private right of action. See Cal. Ins. … Moreover, to exhaust a claim under the FEHA, the employee must file a complaint with the DFEH—not the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.

Asis Internet Services v. Vistaprint USA, Inc.

617 F. Supp. 2d 989 · District Court, N.D. California · May 5, 2009

ORDER SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. … See e.g., ASIS Internet Services v.

Thedorf v. Califano

440 F. Supp. 1328 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 20, 1977

Johnson, a board certified orthopedic surgeon, had examined plaintiff in 1974. … See, e. g., Laffoon v. Califano, supra at 254-255; Russell v. Secretary of Health, Ed. and Welfare, 540 F.2d 353, 355 (8th Cir. 1976). V.

The Board of Trustees, in their capacities as Trustees of the Laborers Health and Welfare Trust Fund for Northern California v. Slauson

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 5, 2022

See Anderson v. … Fraser v. Goodale, 342 F.3d 1032, 1036-37 (9th Cir. 2003) (citing cases).

Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 22, 2025

See Brown v. Stored Value Cards, Inc., 953 F.3d 567, 574 (9th Cir. 2020). But [n]ot all of the factors merit equal weight. . . . … Brown, 953 F.3d at 574 (citation and quotation marks omitted). The first five factors weigh in favor of granting leave to amend.