Case law

United States v. American Trading Co. of San Francisco

138 F. Supp. 536 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 9, 1956

The government cites Horowitz v. U. … Deming v. United States, 1 Ct.Cl. 190, 191 ; Jones v. United States, 1 Ct.Cl. 383, 384 ; Wilson v. United States, 11 Ct.Cl. 513, 520 .

In re Newcomb Interests, Inc.

171 F. Supp. 704 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 1, 1959

Saso v. Furtado, 1951, 104 Cal.App.2d 759 , 232 P.2d 583 ; Cavalli v. Macaire, supra. … McGee v. Allen, 1936, 7 Cal. 2d 468 , 60 P.2d 1026 ; Murphy v. Clayton, 1896, 113 Cal. 153 , 45 P. 267 ; Nishi v. Downing, 1937, 21 Cal.App.2d 1 , 67 P. 2d 1057 .

Pohl v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Local 16 Pension Plan

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 17, 2025

Navarro v. … Waggoner v. Dallaire, 649 F.2d 1362, 1368 (9th 20 Cir. 1981).

Ex parte Wienke

31 F. Supp. 733 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 27, 1940

Chin Ching v. Nagle, 9 Cir., 51 F.2d 64 ; Tulsidas v. Insular Collector, 262 U.S. 258, 263 , 43 S.Ct. 586 , 67 L.Ed. 969 ; Quon Quon Poy v. … United States v. Rodgers, 3 Cir., 185 F. 334, 338 .

Deal v. Kijakazi

District Court, N.D. California · Jul 10, 2024

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 11 492 (9th Cir. 2015). Where evidence is susceptible to more than one rational 12 interpretation, the ALJ’s decision should be upheld. Andrews v. … (citing Reddick v.

Officers for Justice v. Civil Service Commission

473 F. Supp. 801 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 16, 1979

The case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. … In Blake v.

Sea Ranch Ass'n v. California Coastal Commission

527 F. Supp. 390 · District Court, N.D. California · Nov 18, 1981

See, e.g., U.S. v. Douglas County, Nevada, 5 E.R.C. 1577 (U.S.D.C.Nev.1973); Morshead v. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, 45 Cal.App.3d 442 , 119 Cal.Rptr. 586 (1975); Swanson v. Marin Mun. … Miller v. Board of Public Works of City of Los Angeles, 195 Cal. 477 , 234 P. 381 (1925) (upholding ordinance requiring installations of water lines at developer expense); Morshead v.

Psalms

District Court, N.D. California · Aug 20, 2026

Mueller v. 23 Auker, 576 F.3d 979, 992 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Mitchell v. … Board of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 6 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v.

Phelps v. Novato Police Department

District Court, N.D. California · Oct 31, 2023

Id. ¶ 42. 15 Gallagher contacted the San Francisco Board of Supervisors for help, and the Board 16 facilitated a meeting between Gallagher and SFDBI. Id. ¶ 43. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v. City of Oakland, 47 F.3d 2 1522, 1534 (9th Cir. 1995).

Barker v. McFerran

District Court, N.D. California · Sep 19, 2024

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 554, 555 (2007) (citing 24 Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 286 (1986)); see Lee v. City of L.A., 250 F.3d 668, 679 (9th Cir. 25 2001), overruled on other grounds by Galbraith v. … Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 12 U.S. 820, 832 (1976); Sommatino v. United States, 255 F.3d 704, 707 (9th Cir. 2001) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c)); Leorna v.

In re Accellion, Inc. Data Breach Litigation

District Court, N.D. California · Mar 14, 2022

The following nine cases name Accellion as the sole defendant: 10 • Brown v. Accellion, Inc., No. 5:21-cv-01155-EJD, filed February 17, 2021; 11 • Zebelman v. … See 20 Brown Opp’n at 8.

Calihan v. Sloinker

District Court, N.D. California · Feb 13, 2020

See West v. … See Board of Cty. Comm'rs. of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Tsao v. 20 Desert Palace, Inc., 698 F.3d 1128, 1139, 1144 (9th Cir. 2012).

Weinstein v. Katapult Group, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 15, 2022

See Sanders v. Brown, 504 F.3d 903, 910 (9th Cir. 2007). The court may 3 consider matters that are properly the subject of judicial notice, Knievel v. ESPN, 393 4 F.3d 1068, 1076 (9th Cir. 2005); Lee v. … Ah Quin v.

Chemicals for Research & Industry v. Thornburgh

762 F. Supp. 1394 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 29, 1991

Leer v. Murphy, 844 F.2d 628, 633 (9th Cir.1988). . … United States v. Odessa Union Warehouse Co-op., 833 F.2d 172, 174 (9th Cir.1987).

Standard Brands, Inc. v. Radja

114 F. Supp. 456 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 4, 1953

The ten hundred and twenty cases were placed on board with repair to the exterior plywood walls of the specific cases which had suffered most en route from the original African port of Mozambique, Africa. … Ortega & Emigh v. Grace Line, D.C., 72 F.Supp. 302 . Libelants ask damages in the amount of $6,022.02, such being the sum expended for restoration of the tea to commercial condition.

Whitlock v. PEPSI AMERICAS

681 F. Supp. 2d 1116 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 26, 2010

See Avila, et al. v. Willits Environmental Remediation Trust, et al., C 99-3941 SI; Abbott et al. v. Willits Environmental Remediation Trust, et al., C 01-266 SI; Nickerman, et al., v. … In Nickerman, the plaintiffs relied on Potter v.

California Council of the Blind v. County of Alameda

985 F. Supp. 2d 1229 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 24, 2013

Inc. v. … In Baughman v.

In Re Syntex Corp. Securities Litigation

855 F. Supp. 1086 · District Court, N.D. California · May 27, 1994

Freiman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, represented that “ ‘[w]e’re doing well and I think we have a great future,’ ” “ ‘[bjusiness will be good this year ... … . -, 114 S.Ct. 1837 , 128 L.Ed.2d 465 (May 16, 1994); Menowitz v. Brown, 991 F.2d 36, 41 (2d Cir.1993).

State of California by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra v. Azar

District Court, N.D. California · Nov 10, 2020

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY AND THROUGH 3:19-cv-02552-VC ATTORNEY GENERAL XAVIER BECERRA; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF OREGON AND GOVERNOR KATE BROWN … Decisions Issued After Oral Argument, and thereby will take the following case into consideration to the extent that it is relevant to issues presented in Plaintiffs’ pending Motion for Summary Judgment: District of Columbia v.

Dang v. San Francisco Forty Niners

964 F. Supp. 2d 1097 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 2, 2013

United States v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 351 U.S. 377, 404 , 76 S.Ct. 994 , 100 L.Ed. 1264 (1956); see also Brown Shoe Co. v. … Brown Shoe Co., 370 U.S. at 325 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 .