Case law

Saba v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

52 F. Supp. 2d 1117 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 8, 1999

Saba on the reverse of the form. 5 On January 15, 1997, the last day to file an appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), Petitioners appealed the IJ’s decision to the Board. … Rashtabadi v.

California River Watch v. County of Sonoma

55 F. Supp. 3d 1204 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 10, 2014

In Strahan v. … In Aransas Project v.

Jackson v. Fischer

931 F. Supp. 2d 1049 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 15, 2013

The court notes, however, that while plaintiff argues in her opposition that Fernandes was on the board of both Mon-via and New Moon, the SAC does not allege that Fernandes was on the board of New Moon, and also does not … of directors in 2008 (and was also on the board of Monvia); and that Koolasuriya was on the board of directors in 2009.

Northern California Drywall Contractors Ass'n v. District Council of Painters No. 8

879 F. Supp. 96 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 10, 1995

Article 1 establishes a joint committee which directs an adjustment board to administer the grievance and arbitration procedures. … V. Petitioners also seek costs and attorneys fees for this proceeding. Such an award may be made if the respondents’ opposition to the arbitration was in bad faith. United Food and Commercial Workers Union v.

United States v. Certain Land of California

192 F. Supp. 725 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 30, 1961

United States, supra; State of California v. United States, supra; Mayor and Council of City of Baltimore v. United States, supra; United States v. State of Arkansas, 8 Cir., 164 F.2d 943 ; United States v. … The same rule applies to a bridge (United States v. State of Arkansas, supra), a school (United States v. Board of Education, 4 Cir., 253 F.2d 760 ) or a sewage system (Town of Clarksville, Va. v.

Dragovich v. United States Department of the Treasury

764 F. Supp. 2d 1178 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 18, 2011

Strauss v. … Perry v.

Hall v. California Department of Corrections

835 F. Supp. 522 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 19, 1993

Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Board of Tax Appeals, 270 U.S. 117, 123 , 46 S.Ct. 215, 217-18 , 70 L.Ed. 494 (1926) (although Board rules provide for discretionary denial of admission to bar, applicant entitled to due process hearing on denial).

Pacific Lumber Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance

220 F.R.D. 349 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 12, 2003

Panola Land Buyers Ass’n v. Shuman, 762 F.2d 1550 (11th Cir.1985); see also Scroggins v. Air Cargo, Inc., 534 F.2d 1124, 1133 (5th Cir.1976). … Id.; Lowery v.

Turcios-Galan v. Ilchert

633 F. Supp. 247 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 11, 1986

See, e.g., Maldonado de Vasquez v. Ilchert, 614 F.Supp. 538, 539 (N.D.Cal. 1985). … . §§ 243.4 , 103.3; see also Wang v. INS, 622 F.2d 1341, 1349 (to review decision adequately, Board must specify its reasons).

California State Automobile Ass'n v. Smyth

77 F. Supp. 131 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 26, 1948

Or as the Supreme Court stated in Trinidad v. … Koon Kreek Klub v. Thomas, 5 Cir., 108 F.2d 616 . The Supreme Court in Trinidad v.

HealthTrac, Inc. v. Sinclair

302 F. Supp. 2d 1125 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 2004

Mosesian v. … ; Kevin Wielgus, Grayson Hand, and Greg Burnett, and that Pierre Prefontaine has been on the Board since at least April 2000 and is a member of the Board that authorized this suit.

CMG Financial Services, Inc. v. Pacific Trust Bank, F.S.B.

50 F. Supp. 3d 1306 · District Court, N.D. California · Aug 29, 2014

Aug. 18, 2011), the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“the Board”) thoroughly analyzed the impact of Bilski on the patentability of a system, method, and machine readable storage for identifying and configuring metric … The Board noted that abstract software without a physical embodiment is not patentable. See id. at *12 (citing Microsoft Corp. v. AT & T Corp., 550 U.S. 437, 449 , 127 S.Ct. 1746 , 167 L.Ed.2d 737 (2007)).

In re Gee Hop

71 F. 274 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 27, 1895

A petition for a writ of habeas corpus was filed on behalf of Gee Hop, alleging that he was detained and restrained of his liberty on board the steamship City of Peking by the master thereof; that he has applied to the collector … There are no presumptions in favor of a judgment, where the powers of the court are special (Dynes v.

Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.

270 F. Supp. 2d 1132 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 31, 2003

Both the 1982 application and the 1985 applications overcame a series of rejections by the PTO, were the subject of appeals to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board) and petitions to the Patent Office Commissioner … On January 15, 1993, plaintiff appealed the rejection of these nine claims to the Board. See Weinstein Decl (Doc #370, Exh R).

Yarbrough v. Estelle

677 F. Supp. 1033 · District Court, N.D. California · Feb 9, 1988

But section 3000 only makes the imposition of a parole term mandatory, unless waived by the Board. It does not make a three-year term mandatory. … Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 , 92 S.Ct. 495 , 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971).

Fraga v. Sullivan

828 F. Supp. 737 · District Court, N.D. California · May 17, 1993

Louis Lesko (who is board certified), concurred in finding that plaintiff suffered from chronic degenerative disc disease. … Coats v. Heckler, 733 F.2d 1338 (9th Cir.1984).

Garcia v. County of Napa

District Court, N.D. California · Apr 26, 2023

v. … Board of Education].” Id.

Ellis v. NAVAL AIR REWORK FACILITY, ALAMEDA, CAL.

404 F. Supp. 391 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 22, 1975

Ellis v. … See also, Sperling v. United States, 515 F. 2d 465 (3d Cir. 1975); Caro v. Schultz, 521 F.2d 1084 (7th Cir., 1975). cf.

Curran v. Oakland

District Court, N.D. California · Dec 4, 2025

Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. Winn, 559 U.S. 542, 551 (2010) 21 (citation omitted); see also Hensley v. … Armstrong v.

Emma C. v. Eastin

985 F. Supp. 940 · District Court, N.D. California · Oct 17, 1997

. § 1415 (f); Charlie F. v. Board of Educ. of Skokie Sch. Dish, 98 F.3d 989, 992 (7th Cir.1996). Within the Ninth Circuit, moreover, the exhaustion requirement appears to be jurisdictional in nature. See Dreher v. … Board of Trustees of Target Range Sch.