Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
7,967 results
1.31s
Bar's Leaks Western, Inc. v. Pollock
148 F. Supp. 710 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 24, 1957
Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 , and Angel v. … See Lehn & Fink Products Corp. v. Milner Products Co., D.C., 117 F.Supp. 320, 322 ; also Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc., v. Brown & Bigelow, Inc., D.C., 104 F. Supp. 716, 723-724 .
Cited 12 timesPublishedSecurities & Exchange Commission v. Timetrust, Inc.
28 F. Supp. 34 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 10, 1939
Board of Medical Examiners, 117 Cal.App. 113 , 3 P.2d 344 . 46 Rule 20, “Permissive Joinder Of Parties.” 47 Moore’s Federal Practice, Vol. 2, p. 2165. 48 Board of Trade v. … Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 U.S. 231, 238, 239 , 38 S.Ct. 242 , 62 L.Ed. 683 .
Cited 53 timesPublishedVolterra Semiconductor Corp. v. Primarion, Inc.
796 F. Supp. 2d 1025 · District Court, N.D. California · May 4, 2011
Lau entitled “Chip on Board Technologies for Multichip Technologies,” published by Chapman & Hall in 1994 (“Lau Chip on Board Book”). … board such that the active side of the silicon chip is facing up away from the PC board.
Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Aug 25, 2021
of County Comm’rs v. … Clouthier v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownEcological Rights Foundation v. City of Eureka
District Court, N.D. California · Mar 5, 2025
The 2023 NPDES Permit 13 On March 1, 2024, EcoRights filed suit against the Regional Board in Sacramento County 14 Superior Court, Humboldt Waterkeeper et al. v. … Thompson v. Enomoto, 24 915 F.2d 1383, 1388 (9th Cir. 1990); see also Gates v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown253 F.R.D. 469 · District Court, N.D. California · Jul 7, 2008
ORDER SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. … And, Wilmer v.
Questioned by Fidelity National Financial, Inc. v. Friedman, 855 F. Supp. 2d 948 (2012)Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Oct 2, 2025
Feb. 24, 2017) (citing Brown v. Collections Bureau of Am., Ltd, 183 F.Supp.3d 1004, 1005 3 (N.D. … Brown, 183 8 F.Supp.3d at 1005.
Cited 0 timesUnknown245 F. Supp. 383 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 11, 1965
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 217 F.2d 401 (9th Cir., 1954); Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 215 F.2d 697 (5th Cir. 1954); Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. … In addition to Harris v. United States, supra, and Hughes v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWashington v. Joe's Crab Shack
271 F.R.D. 629 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 23, 2010
See Cicairos v. Summit Logistics, Inc., 133 Cal.App.4th 949, 962-63 , 35 Cal.Rptr.3d 243 (2005) (employers must affirmatively ensure that employees take breaks); Brown v. … See Perez v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. California · Mar 17, 2025
See Sax v. … Tri-State Pension Fund v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown367 F. Supp. 2d 1265 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 28, 2005
See Marchi v. Board of Coop. Ed. Services, 173 F.3d 469 (2d Cir.1999). In Marchi , a special education teacher, after converting to Christianity began including forgiveness, reconciliation and God into his teaching. … The teacher brought a § 1983 action against the school board claiming free speech and free exercise of religion violations.
Cited 5 timesPublishedPacific Lumber Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance
220 F.R.D. 349 · District Court, N.D. California · Dec 12, 2003
Panola Land Buyers Ass’n v. Shuman, 762 F.2d 1550 (11th Cir.1985); see also Scroggins v. Air Cargo, Inc., 534 F.2d 1124, 1133 (5th Cir.1976). … Id.; Lowery v.
Cited 39 timesPublishedHennighan v. Insphere Insurance Solutions
38 F. Supp. 3d 1083 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 21, 2014
Testimony Before California Unemployment Appeals Board In his memoranda in opposition to In-sphere’s motion for summary judgment, Hennighan cites extensively to testimony given before the California Unemployment Appeals Board … See Sis-tare-Meyer v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedAmerican Home Assurance Co. v. SMG Stone Co.
119 F. Supp. 3d 1053 · District Court, N.D. California · Jun 11, 2015
Similarly, in Anthem, the Ninth Circuit held that the insured’s “defective circuit boards clearly caused ‘property damage’ ” where the defective circuit boards were supplied by the insured, incorporated by a manufacturer … Co. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedSteward v. County of Santa Clara
District Court, N.D. California · Feb 25, 2020
Ct., 42 Cal. 4th 730, 741-42 (Cal. 2007) – requires a person to present his 8 claim to the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board (“Board”) before he 9 may file an action for damages against a California … California v. Superior Court (Bodde), 32 Cal. 4th 1234, 1240 (Cal. 2004); see also 19 Harris v. Escamilla, 736 F. App’x 618, 621-22 (9th Cir.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFlorey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health v. Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers
31 F. Supp. 3d 1034 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 26, 2014
Exch. v. … See Thomson v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedTolowa Nation v. United States
380 F. Supp. 3d 959 · District Court, N.D. California · Mar 12, 2019
Muwekma Ohlone Tribe v. Salazar , 708 F.3d 209 , 211 (D.C. … Appeals are heard by the Interior Board of Indian Appeals. § 83.11(a)(1).
Cited 4 timesPublished148 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 23, 1957
In Kahn v. Anderson, supra, and Givens v. … Both Osborn v. Swope, supra, and Osborne v. Swope, 9 Cir., 226 F.2d 908 , support respondent’s view. These cases, following the Supreme Court holding in Gusik v.
Cited 1 timesPublished34 F. Supp. 409 · District Court, N.D. California · Sep 3, 1940
Silz v. Hesterberg, 211 U.S. 31 , 29 S.Ct. 10 , 53 L.Ed. 75 . In Miller v. … In Smith v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedSAP Aktiengesellschaft v. 12 Technologies, Inc.
250 F.R.D. 472 · District Court, N.D. California · Apr 8, 2008
Bowles v. Reade, 198 F.3d 752, 757 (9th Cir.1999). … V.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna